EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michael G. Forbes
dblp:156/0475
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Motion planning and robot control · 75% Deep learning architectures and training · 12% Reinforcement learning · 12% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › optimal control
linear quadratic regulator |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | DiLQR: Differentiable Iterative Linear Quadratic Regulator via Implicit Differentiation · ICML 2025 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | DiLQR: Differentiable Iterative Linear Quadratic Regulator via Implicit Differentiation · ICML 2025 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | DiLQR: Differentiable Iterative Linear Quadratic Regulator via Implicit Differentiation · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › sequence modeling
deep dynamics model |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Almost Surely Stable Deep Dynamics · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Almost Surely Stable Deep Dynamics · NeurIPS 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
iterative LQR · 0.9implicit differentiation · 0.9lyapunov neural network · 0.4implicit output layer · 0.4convex lyapunov function · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | DiLQR: Differentiable Iterative Linear Quadratic Regulator via Implicit DifferentiationabstractWhile differentiable control has emerged as a powerful paradigm combining model-free flexibility with model-based efficiency, the iterative Linear Quadratic Regulator (iLQR) remains underexplored as a differentiable component. The scalability of differentiating through extended iterations and horizons poses significant challenges, hindering iLQR from being an effective differentiable controller. This paper introduces DiLQR, a framework that facilitates differentiation through iLQR, allowing it to serve as a trainable and differentiable module, either as or within a neural network. A novel aspect of this framework is the analytical solution that it provides for the gradient of an iLQR controller through implicit differentiation, which ensures a constant backward cost regardless of iteration, while producing an accurate gradient. We evaluate our framework on imitation tasks on famous control benchmarks. Our analytical method demonstrates superior computational performance, achieving up to $\textbf{128x}$ speedup and a minimum of $\textbf{21x}$ speedup compared to automatic differentiation. Our method also demonstrates superior learning performance ($\mathbf{10^6x}$) compared to traditional neural network policies and better model loss with differentiable controllers that lack exact analytical gradients. Furthermore, we integrate our module into a larger network with visual inputs to demonstrate the capacity of our method for high-dimensional, fully end-to-end tasks. Codes can be found on the project homepage https://sites.google.com/view/dilqr/. Shuyuan Wang, Philip D. Loewen, Michael G. Forbes, R. Bhushan Gopaluni |
ICML | 3 |
| 2024 | Guiding Reinforcement Learning with Incomplete System DynamicsabstractModel-free reinforcement learning (RL) is inherently a reactive method, operating under the assumption that it starts with no prior knowledge of the system and entirely depends on trial-and-error for learning. This approach faces several challenges, such as poor sample efficiency, generalization, and the need for well-designed reward functions to guide learning effectively. On the other hand, controllers based on complete system dynamics do not require data. This paper addresses the intermediate situation where there is not enough model information for complete controller design, but there is enough to suggest that a model-free approach is not the best approach either. By carefully decoupling known and unknown information about the system dynamics, we obtain an embedded controller guided by our partial model and thus improve the learning efficiency of an RL-enhanced approach. A modular design allows us to deploy mainstream RL algorithms to refine the policy. Simulation results show that our method significantly improves sample efficiency compared with standard RL methods on continuous control tasks, and also offers enhanced performance over traditional control approaches. Experiments on a real ground vehicle also validate the performance of our method, including generalization and robustness. Shuyuan Wang, Jingliang Duan, Nathan P. Lawrence, Philip D. Loewen, Michael G. Forbes, R. Bhushan Gopaluni, Lixian Zhang 0001 |
IROS | 5 |
| 2020 | Almost Surely Stable Deep DynamicsabstractWe introduce a method for learning provably stable deep neural network based dynamic models from observed data. Specifically, we consider discrete-time stochastic dynamic models, as they are of particular interest in practical applications such as estimation and control. However, these aspects exacerbate the challenge of guaranteeing stability. Our method works by embedding a Lyapunov neural network into the dynamic model, thereby inherently satisfying the stability criterion. To this end, we propose two approaches and apply them in both the deterministic and stochastic settings: one exploits convexity of the Lyapunov function, while the other enforces stability through an implicit output layer. We demonstrate the utility of each approach through numerical examples. Nathan P. Lawrence, Philip D. Loewen, Michael G. Forbes, Johan U. Backström, R. Bhushan Gopaluni |
NeurIPS | 3 |