Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Wenle Wu
dblp:156/2336
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Internet of things and sensor networks · 56% Edge and fog computing · 44% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Internet of things and sensor networks
mobile crowdsensing |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | TaskMe: multi-task allocation in mobile crowd sensing · UbiComp 2016 |
Edge and fog computing
task allocation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | TaskMe: multi-task allocation in mobile crowd sensing · UbiComp 2016 |
Internet of things and sensor networks › mobile crowdsensing
participant selection |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | TaskMe: multi-task allocation in mobile crowd sensing · UbiComp 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multi-objective optimization · 0.2minimum-cost maximum-flow · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | ActiveCrowd: A Framework for Optimized Multitask Allocation in Mobile Crowdsensing SystemsabstractWorker selection is a key issue in mobile crowd sensing (MCS). While the previous worker selection approaches mainly focus on selecting a proper subset of workers for a single MCS task, a multitask-oriented worker selection is essential and useful for the efficiency of large-scale MCS platforms. This paper proposes ActiveCrowd, a worker selection framework for multitask MCS environments. We study the problem of multitask worker selection under two situations: worker selection based on workers' intentional movement for time-sensitive tasks and unintentional movement for delay-tolerant tasks. For time-sensitive tasks, workers are required to move to the task venue intentionally and the goal is to minimize the total distance moved. For delay-tolerant tasks, we select workers whose route is predicted to pass by the task venues and the goal is to minimize the total number of workers. Two greedy-enhanced genetic algorithms are proposed to solve them. Experiments verify that the proposed algorithms outperform baseline methods under different experiment settings (scale of task sets, available workers, varied task distributions, etc.). Bin Guo 0001, Yan Liu 0045, Wenle Wu, Zhiwen Yu 0001, Qi Han 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Hum. Mach. Syst. | 3 |
| 2016 | TaskMe: multi-task allocation in mobile crowd sensingabstractTask allocation or participant selection is a key issue in Mobile Crowd Sensing (MCS). While previous participant selection approaches mainly focus on selecting a proper subset of users for a single MCS task, multi-task-oriented participant selection is essential and useful for the efficiency of large-scale MCS platforms. This paper proposes TaskMe, a participant selection framework for multi-task MCS environments. In particular, two typical multi-task allocation situations with bi-objective optimization goals are studied: (1) For FPMT (few participants, more tasks), each participant is required to complete multiple tasks and the optimization goal is to maximize the total number of accomplished tasks while minimizing the total movement distance. (2) For MPFT (more participants, few tasks), each participant is selected to perform one task based on pre-registered working areas in view of privacy, and the optimization objective is to minimize total incentive payments while minimizing the total traveling distance. Two optimal algorithms based on the Minimum Cost Maximum Flow theory are proposed for FPMT, and two algorithms based on the multi-objective optimization theory are proposed for MPFT. Experiments verify that the proposed algorithms outperform baselines based on a large-scale real-word dataset under different experiment settings (the number of tasks, various task distributions, etc.). Yan Liu 0045, Bin Guo 0001, Yang Wang 0006, Wenle Wu, Zhiwen Yu 0001, Daqing Zhang 0001 |
UbiComp | 4 |