Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Luke C. Dion
dblp:156/4138
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1981
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Systems and software security · 44% Authentication and access control · 28% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 28% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Authentication and access control
access control models |
0.0 | 1 | 1981 | A Complete Protection Model · S&P 1981 |
Systems and software security › multilevel security
bell-lapadula model |
0.0 | 1 | 1981 | A Complete Protection Model · S&P 1981 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
message authentication codes |
0.0 | 1 | 1981 | A Complete Protection Model · S&P 1981 |
Systems and software security
operating system security |
0.0 | 1 | 1981 | A Complete Protection Model · S&P 1981 |
Systems and software security
secure system design |
0.0 | 1 | 1981 | A Complete Protection Model · S&P 1981 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
formal security modeling · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1981 | A Complete Protection ModelabstractThe Bell & LaPadula computer security model is, to date, the most successful data flow restriction security model. Specifically, it prevents unauthorized downgrading of data. K.J. Bibs strengthened the Bell & LaPadula security model by adding security's mathematical dual (integrity) to prevent unauthorized upgrading of data. The security and integrity constraints are overly restrictive in some cases and not restrictive enough in others. This paper describes another extension to the Bell & LaPadula security model (with integrity) to better accommodate secure systems designers and implementers. Luke C. Dion |
S&P | 1 |