Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Luke C. Dion

dblp:156/4138 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1981
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Systems and software security · 44% Authentication and access control · 28% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 28%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Authentication and access control
access control models
0.011981
A Complete Protection Model · S&P 1981
Systems and software security › multilevel security
bell-lapadula model
0.011981
A Complete Protection Model · S&P 1981
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
message authentication codes
0.011981
A Complete Protection Model · S&P 1981
Systems and software security
operating system security
0.011981
A Complete Protection Model · S&P 1981
Systems and software security
secure system design
0.011981
A Complete Protection Model · S&P 1981

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

formal security modeling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1981 A Complete Protection Model
abstract
The Bell & LaPadula computer security model is, to date, the most successful data flow restriction security model. Specifically, it prevents unauthorized downgrading of data. K.J. Bibs strengthened the Bell & LaPadula security model by adding security's mathematical dual (integrity) to prevent unauthorized upgrading of data. The security and integrity constraints are overly restrictive in some cases and not restrictive enough in others. This paper describes another extension to the Bell & LaPadula security model (with integrity) to better accommodate secure systems designers and implementers.
Luke C. Dion
S&P1