Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Phil Janson
dblp:156/6401
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1993
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 67% Authentication and access control · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Authentication and access control › authentication
authentication protocols |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | Interconnecting domains with heterogeneous key distribution and authentication protocols · S&P 1993 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › key management
key distribution |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | Interconnecting domains with heterogeneous key distribution and authentication protocols · S&P 1993 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › security protocol analysis
protocol transformation |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | Interconnecting domains with heterogeneous key distribution and authentication protocols · S&P 1993 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
synchronization protocol · 0.0proxy mechanism · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1993 | Interconnecting domains with heterogeneous key distribution and authentication protocolsabstractA number of mechanisms are described that can be used in the design of a protocol converter for authentication and key distribution protocols. First, the scope of the mechanisms is defined. The authors outline the class of authentication systems that were considered during the design of the mechanisms. A first mechanism, based on proxies and a synchronization protocol, allows for a transparent protocol conversion. It is generic, and can be tailored to different specific situations. The second mechanism addresses the problem of the state of the protocol converter. Both mechanisms can be used separately or in combination. When properly combined, they provide for a robust, transparent, and safe protocol converter for authentication and key distribution protocols. Example applications are described in some detail.> Frank Piessens, Bart De Decker, Phil Janson |
S&P | 3 |