Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lacey Best-Rowden
dblp:156/9578
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0001-8070-2595ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 4 · 3 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
3 papers |
Biometric security · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Face, body and person analysis · 50% Generative modeling · 50% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Biometric security
face recognition |
0.5 | 2 | 2018 | Learning Face Image Quality From Human Assessments · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2018 Unconstrained Face Recognition: Identifying a Person of Interest From a Media Collection · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2014 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › face synthesis
face aging |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Longitudinal Study of Automatic Face Recognition · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2018 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
face recognition |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Longitudinal Study of Automatic Face Recognition · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2018 |
Biometric security
fingerprint recognition |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Fingerprint Recognition of Young Children · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2017 |
Biometric security › face recognition
3d face recognition |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | Unconstrained Face Recognition: Identifying a Person of Interest From a Media Collection · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
support vector regression · 0.3statistical analysis · 0.3mixed-effects regression · 0.3human assessment · 0.3deep convolutional neural network · 0.3mixed-effects statistical models · 0.3score fusion · 0.2quality-based frame selection · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Longitudinal Study of Automatic Face RecognitionabstractThe two underlying premises of automatic face recognition are uniqueness and permanence. This paper investigates the permanence property by addressing the following: Does face recognition ability of state-of-the-art systems degrade with elapsed time between enrolled and query face images? If so, what is the rate of decline w.r.t. the elapsed time? While previous studies have reported degradations in accuracy, no formal statistical analysis of large-scale longitudinal data has been conducted. We conduct such an analysis on two mugshot databases, which are the largest facial aging databases studied to date in terms of number of subjects, images per subject, and elapsed times. Mixed-effects regression models are applied to genuine similarity scores from state-of-the-art COTS face matchers to quantify the population-mean rate of change in genuine scores over time, subject-specific variability, and the influence of age, sex, race, and face image quality. Longitudinal analysis shows that despite decreasing genuine scores, 99% of subjects can still be recognized at 0.01% FAR up to approximately 6 years elapsed time, and that age, sex, and race only marginally influence these trends. The methodology presented here should be periodically repeated to determine age-invariant properties of face recognition as state-of-the-art evolves to better address facial aging. Lacey Best-Rowden, Anil K. Jain 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |
| 2018 | Learning Face Image Quality From Human AssessmentsabstractFace image quality can be defined as a measure of the utility of a face image to automatic face recognition. In this paper, we propose (and compare) two methods for learning face image quality based on target face quality values from: 1) human assessments of face image quality (matcher-independent) and 2) quality values computed from similarity scores (matcher-dependent). A support vector regression model trained on face features extracted using a deep convolutional neural network (ConvNet) is used to predict the quality of a face image. The proposed methods are evaluated on two unconstrained face image databases, Labeled Faces in the Wild and IARPA Janus Benchmark-A (IJB-A), which both contain facial variations encompassing a multitude of quality factors. Evaluation of the proposed automatic face image quality measures shows we are able to reduce the false non-match rate at 1% false match rate by at least 13% for two face matchers (a commercial off-the-shelf matcher and a ConvNet matcher) by using the proposed face quality to select subsets of face images and video frames for matching templates (i.e., multiple faces per subject) in the IJB-A protocol. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to utilize human assessments of face image quality in designing a predictor of unconstrained face quality that is shown to be effective in cross-database evaluation. Lacey Best-Rowden, Anil K. Jain 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. | 1 |
| 2017 | Fingerprint Recognition of Young ChildrenabstractIn 1899, Galton first captured ink-on-paper fingerprints of a single child from birth until the age of 4.5 years, manually compared the prints, and concluded that “the print of a child at the age of 2.5 years would serve to identify him ever after.” Since then, ink-on-paper fingerprinting and manual comparison methods have been superseded by digital capture and automatic fingerprint comparison techniques, but only a few feasibility studies on child fingerprint recognition have been conducted. Here, we present the first systematic and rigorous longitudinal study that addresses the following questions: (1) Do fingerprints of young children possess the salient features required to uniquely recognize a child? (2) If so, at what age can a child's fingerprints be captured with sufficient fidelity for recognition? (3) Can a child's fingerprints be used to reliably recognize the child as he ages? For this paper, we collected fingerprints of 309 children (0-5 years old) four different times over a one year period. We show, for the first time, that fingerprints acquired from a child as young as 6-h old exhibit distinguishing features necessary for recognition, and that state-of-the-art fingerprint technology achieves high recognition accuracy (98.9% true accept rate at 0.1% false accept rate) for children older than six months. In addition, we use mixed-effects statistical models to study the persistence of child fingerprint recognition accuracy and show that the recognition accuracy is not significantly affected over the one year time lapse in our data. Given rapidly growing requirements to recognize children for vaccination tracking, delivery of supplementary food, and national identification documents, this paper demonstrates that fingerprint recognition of young children (six months and older) is a viable solution based on available capture and recognition technology. Anil K. Jain 0001, Sunpreet S. Arora, Kai Cao 0001, Lacey Best-Rowden, Anjoo Bhatnagar |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. | 4 |
| 2016 | Giving Infants an Identity: Fingerprint Sensing and RecognitionabstractThere is a growing demand for biometrics-based recognition of children for a number of applications, particularly in developing countries where children do not have any form of identification. These applications include tracking child vaccination schedules, identifying missing children, preventing fraud in food subsidies, and preventing newborn baby swaps in hospitals. Our objective is to develop a fingerprint-based identification system for infants (age range: 0-12 months)1. Our ongoing research has addressed the following issues: (i) design of a compact, comfortable, high-resolution (>1,000 ppi) fingerprint reader; (ii) image enhancement algorithms to improve quality of infant fingerprint images; and (iii) collection of longitudinal infant fingerprint data to evaluate identification accuracy over time. This collaboration between Michigan State University, Dayalbagh Educational Institute, Saran Ashram Hospital, Agra, India and NEC Corporation, has demonstrated the feasibility of recognizing infants older than 4 weeks using fingerprints. Anil K. Jain 0001, Sunpreet S. Arora, Lacey Best-Rowden, Kai Cao 0001, Prem Sewak Sudhish, Anjoo Bhatnagar, Yoshinori Koda |
ICTD | 3 |
| 2014 | Unconstrained face recognition: Establishing baseline human performance via crowdsourcingabstractResearch focus in face recognition has shifted towards recognition of faces “in the wild” for both still images and videos which are captured in unconstrained imaging environments and without user cooperation. Due to confounding factors of pose, illumination, and expression, as well as occlusion and low resolution, current face recognition systems deployed in forensic and security applications operate in a semi-automatic manner; an operator typically reviews the top results from the face recognition system to manually determine the final match. For this reason, it is important to analyze the accuracies achieved by both the matching algorithms (machines) and humans on unconstrained face recognition tasks. In this paper, we report human accuracy on unconstrained faces in still images and videos via crowd-sourcing on Amazon Mechanical Turk. In particular, we report the first human performance on the YouTube Faces database and show that humans are superior to machines, especially when videos contain contextual cues in addition to the face image. We investigate the accuracy of humans from two different countries (United States and India) and find that humans from the United States are more accurate, possibly due to their familiarity with the faces of the public figures in the YouTube Faces database. A fusion of recognitions made by humans and a commercial-off-the-shelf face matcher improves performance over humans alone. Lacey Best-Rowden, Shiwani Bisht, Joshua C. Klontz, Anil K. Jain 0001 |
IJCB | 1 |
| 2014 | Unconstrained Face Recognition: Identifying a Person of Interest From a Media CollectionabstractAs face recognition applications progress from constrained sensing and cooperative subjects scenarios (e.g., driver's license and passport photos) to unconstrained scenarios with uncooperative subjects (e.g., video surveillance), new challenges are encountered. These challenges are due to variations in ambient illumination, image resolution, background clutter, facial pose, expression, and occlusion. In forensic investigations where the goal is to identify a person of interest, often based on low quality face images and videos, we need to utilize whatever source of information is available about the person. This could include one or more video tracks, multiple still images captured by bystanders (using, for example, their mobile phones), 3-D face models constructed from image(s) and video(s), and verbal descriptions of the subject provided by witnesses. These verbal descriptions can be used to generate a face sketch and provide ancillary information about the person of interest (e.g., gender, race, and age). While traditional face matching methods generally take a single media (i.e., a still face image, video track, or face sketch) as input, this paper considers using the entire gamut of media as a probe to generate a single candidate list for the person of interest. We show that the proposed approach boosts the likelihood of correctly identifying the person of interest through the use of different fusion schemes, 3-D face models, and incorporation of quality measures for fusion and video frame selection. Lacey Best-Rowden, Hu Han 0001, Charles Otto, Brendan Klare, Anil K. Jain 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. | 1 |