Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Judith A. Goodship
dblp:156/9703
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
sequencing data analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Using population data for assessing next-generation sequencing performance · Bioinform. 2015 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Bases adjacent to mononucleotide repeats show an increased single nucleotide polymorphism frequency in the human genome · Bioinform. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › population genetics
human genetic variation |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Bases adjacent to mononucleotide repeats show an increased single nucleotide polymorphism frequency in the human genome · Bioinform. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
single nucleotide polymorphism |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Bases adjacent to mononucleotide repeats show an increased single nucleotide polymorphism frequency in the human genome · Bioinform. 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
maximum likelihood estimation · 0.2statistical analysis · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Using population data for assessing next-generation sequencing performanceabstractMOTIVATION: During the past 4 years, whole-exome sequencing has become a standard tool for finding rare variants causing Mendelian disorders. In that time, there has also been a proliferation of both sequencing platforms and approaches to analyse their output. This requires approaches to assess the performance of different methods. Traditionally, criteria such as comparison with microarray data or a number of known polymorphic sites have been used. Here we expand such approaches, developing a maximum likelihood framework and using it to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of whole-exome sequencing data. RESULTS: Using whole-exome sequencing data for a panel of 19 individuals, we show that estimated sensitivity and specificity are similar to those calculated using microarray data as a reference. We explore the effect of frequency misspecification arising from using an inappropriately selected population and find that, although the estimates are affected, the rankings across procedures remain the same. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: An implementation using Perl and R can be found at busso.ncl.ac.uk (Username: igm101; Password: Z1z1nts). Darren T. Houniet, Thahira J. Rahman, Saeed Al Turki, Matthew E. Hurles, Yaobo Xu, Judith A. Goodship, Bernard D. Keavney, Mauro F. Santibanez-Koref |
Bioinform. | 6 |
| 2011 | Bases adjacent to mononucleotide repeats show an increased single nucleotide polymorphism frequency in the human genomeabstractMononucleotide repeats (MNRs) are abundant in eukaryotic genomes and exhibit a high degree of length variability due to insertion and deletion events. However, the relationship between these repeats and mutation rates in surrounding sequences has not been systematically investigated. We have analyzed the frequency of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at positions close to and within MNRs in the human genome. Overall, we find a 2- to 4-fold increase in the SNP frequency at positions immediately adjacent to the boundaries of MNRs, relative to that at more distant bases. This relationship exhibits a strong asymmetry between 3' and 5' ends of repeat tracts and is dependent upon the repeat motif, length and orientation of surrounding repeats. Our analysis suggests that the incorporation or exclusion of bases adjacent to the boundary of the repeat through substitutions, in which these nucleotides mutate towards or away from the base present within the repeat, respectively, may be another mechanism by which MNRs expand and contract in the human genome. K. J. Siddle, Judith A. Goodship, Bernard D. Keavney, Mauro F. Santibanez-Koref |
Bioinform. | 2 |