Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Judith A. Goodship

dblp:156/9703 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
sequencing data analysis
0.212015
Using population data for assessing next-generation sequencing performance · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics
0.112011
Bases adjacent to mononucleotide repeats show an increased single nucleotide polymorphism frequency in the human genome · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology › population genetics
human genetic variation
0.112011
Bases adjacent to mononucleotide repeats show an increased single nucleotide polymorphism frequency in the human genome · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
single nucleotide polymorphism
0.112011
Bases adjacent to mononucleotide repeats show an increased single nucleotide polymorphism frequency in the human genome · Bioinform. 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

maximum likelihood estimation · 0.2statistical analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Using population data for assessing next-generation sequencing performance
abstract
MOTIVATION: During the past 4 years, whole-exome sequencing has become a standard tool for finding rare variants causing Mendelian disorders. In that time, there has also been a proliferation of both sequencing platforms and approaches to analyse their output. This requires approaches to assess the performance of different methods. Traditionally, criteria such as comparison with microarray data or a number of known polymorphic sites have been used. Here we expand such approaches, developing a maximum likelihood framework and using it to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of whole-exome sequencing data. RESULTS: Using whole-exome sequencing data for a panel of 19 individuals, we show that estimated sensitivity and specificity are similar to those calculated using microarray data as a reference. We explore the effect of frequency misspecification arising from using an inappropriately selected population and find that, although the estimates are affected, the rankings across procedures remain the same. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: An implementation using Perl and R can be found at busso.ncl.ac.uk (Username: igm101; Password: Z1z1nts).
Darren T. Houniet, Thahira J. Rahman, Saeed Al Turki, Matthew E. Hurles, Yaobo Xu, Judith A. Goodship, Bernard D. Keavney, Mauro F. Santibanez-Koref
Bioinform.6
2011 Bases adjacent to mononucleotide repeats show an increased single nucleotide polymorphism frequency in the human genome
abstract
Mononucleotide repeats (MNRs) are abundant in eukaryotic genomes and exhibit a high degree of length variability due to insertion and deletion events. However, the relationship between these repeats and mutation rates in surrounding sequences has not been systematically investigated. We have analyzed the frequency of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at positions close to and within MNRs in the human genome. Overall, we find a 2- to 4-fold increase in the SNP frequency at positions immediately adjacent to the boundaries of MNRs, relative to that at more distant bases. This relationship exhibits a strong asymmetry between 3' and 5' ends of repeat tracts and is dependent upon the repeat motif, length and orientation of surrounding repeats. Our analysis suggests that the incorporation or exclusion of bases adjacent to the boundary of the repeat through substitutions, in which these nucleotides mutate towards or away from the base present within the repeat, respectively, may be another mechanism by which MNRs expand and contract in the human genome.
K. J. Siddle, Judith A. Goodship, Bernard D. Keavney, Mauro F. Santibanez-Koref
Bioinform.2