Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kim Thys
dblp:156/9732
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
0000-0002-0400-6915ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › variant calling
low-frequency variant detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | VirVarSeq: a low-frequency virus variant detection pipeline for Illumina sequencing using adaptive base-calling accuracy filtering · Bioinform. 2015 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | VirVarSeq: a low-frequency virus variant detection pipeline for Illumina sequencing using adaptive base-calling accuracy filtering · Bioinform. 2015 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › computational genomics
SNP detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | VirVarSeq: a low-frequency virus variant detection pipeline for Illumina sequencing using adaptive base-calling accuracy filtering · Bioinform. 2015 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
viral genomics |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | VirVarSeq: a low-frequency virus variant detection pipeline for Illumina sequencing using adaptive base-calling accuracy filtering · Bioinform. 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
quality score filtering · 0.2hidden markov model · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | VirVarSeq: a low-frequency virus variant detection pipeline for Illumina sequencing using adaptive base-calling accuracy filteringabstractMOTIVATION: In virology, massively parallel sequencing (MPS) opens many opportunities for studying viral quasi-species, e.g. in HIV-1- and HCV-infected patients. This is essential for understanding pathways to resistance, which can substantially improve treatment. Although MPS platforms allow in-depth characterization of sequence variation, their measurements still involve substantial technical noise. For Illumina sequencing, single base substitutions are the main error source and impede powerful assessment of low-frequency mutations. Fortunately, base calls are complemented with quality scores (Qs) that are useful for differentiating errors from the real low-frequency mutations. RESULTS: A variant calling tool, Q-cpileup, is proposed, which exploits the Qs of nucleotides in a filtering strategy to increase specificity. The tool is imbedded in an open-source pipeline, VirVarSeq, which allows variant calling starting from fastq files. Using both plasmid mixtures and clinical samples, we show that Q-cpileup is able to reduce the number of false-positive findings. The filtering strategy is adaptive and provides an optimized threshold for individual samples in each sequencing run. Additionally, linkage information is kept between single-nucleotide polymorphisms as variants are called at the codon level. This enables virologists to have an immediate biological interpretation of the reported variants with respect to their antiviral drug responses. A comparison with existing SNP caller tools reveals that calling variants at the codon level with Q-cpileup results in an outstanding sensitivity while maintaining a good specificity for variants with frequencies down to 0.5%. AVAILABILITY: The VirVarSeq is available, together with a user's guide and test data, at sourceforge: http://sourceforge.net/projects/virtools/?source=directory. Bie M. P. Verbist, Kim Thys, Joke Reumers, Yves Wetzels, Koen Van der Borght, Willem Talloen, Jeroen Aerssens, Lieven Clement, Olivier Thas |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2015 | QQ-SNV: single nucleotide variant detection at low frequency by comparing the quality quantilesabstractBACKGROUND: Next generation sequencing enables studying heterogeneous populations of viral infections. When the sequencing is done at high coverage depth ("deep sequencing"), low frequency variants can be detected. Here we present QQ-SNV (http://sourceforge.net/projects/qqsnv), a logistic regression classifier model developed for the Illumina sequencing platforms that uses the quantiles of the quality scores, to distinguish true single nucleotide variants from sequencing errors based on the estimated SNV probability. To train the model, we created a dataset of an in silico mixture of five HIV-1 plasmids. Testing of our method in comparison to the existing methods LoFreq, ShoRAH, and V-Phaser 2 was performed on two HIV and four HCV plasmid mixture datasets and one influenza H1N1 clinical dataset. RESULTS: For default application of QQ-SNV, variants were called using a SNV probability cutoff of 0.5 (QQ-SNV(D)). To improve the sensitivity we used a SNV probability cutoff of 0.0001 (QQ-SNV(HS)). To also increase specificity, SNVs called were overruled when their frequency was below the 80(th) percentile calculated on the distribution of error frequencies (QQ-SNV(HS-P80)). When comparing QQ-SNV versus the other methods on the plasmid mixture test sets, QQ-SNV(D) performed similarly to the existing approaches. QQ-SNV(HS) was more sensitive on all test sets but with more false positives. QQ-SNV(HS-P80) was found to be the most accurate method over all test sets by balancing sensitivity and specificity. When applied to a paired-end HCV sequencing study, with lowest spiked-in true frequency of 0.5%, QQ-SNV(HS-P80) revealed a sensitivity of 100% (vs. 40-60% for the existing methods) and a specificity of 100% (vs. 98.0-99.7% for the existing methods). In addition, QQ-SNV required the least overall computation time to process the test sets. Finally, when testing on a clinical sample, four putative true variants with frequency below 0.5% were consistently detected by QQ-SNV(HS-P80) from different generations of Illumina sequencers. CONCLUSIONS: We developed and successfully evaluated a novel method, called QQ-SNV, for highly efficient single nucleotide variant calling on Illumina deep sequencing virology data. Koen Van der Borght, Kim Thys, Yves Wetzels, Lieven Clement, Bie M. P. Verbist, Joke Reumers, Herman van Vlijmen, Jeroen Aerssens |
BMC Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2015 | ViVaMBC: estimating viral sequence variation in complex populations from illumina deep-sequencing data using model-based clusteringabstractBACKGROUND: Deep-sequencing allows for an in-depth characterization of sequence variation in complex populations. However, technology associated errors may impede a powerful assessment of low-frequency mutations. Fortunately, base calls are complemented with quality scores which are derived from a quadruplet of intensities, one channel for each nucleotide type for Illumina sequencing. The highest intensity of the four channels determines the base that is called. Mismatch bases can often be corrected by the second best base, i.e. the base with the second highest intensity in the quadruplet. A virus variant model-based clustering method, ViVaMBC, is presented that explores quality scores and second best base calls for identifying and quantifying viral variants. ViVaMBC is optimized to call variants at the codon level (nucleotide triplets) which enables immediate biological interpretation of the variants with respect to their antiviral drug responses. RESULTS: Using mixtures of HCV plasmids we show that our method accurately estimates frequencies down to 0.5%. The estimates are unbiased when average coverages of 25,000 are reached. A comparison with the SNP-callers V-Phaser2, ShoRAH, and LoFreq shows that ViVaMBC has a superb sensitivity and specificity for variants with frequencies above 0.4%. Unlike the competitors, ViVaMBC reports a higher number of false-positive findings with frequencies below 0.4% which might partially originate from picking up artificial variants introduced by errors in the sample and library preparation step. CONCLUSIONS: ViVaMBC is the first method to call viral variants directly at the codon level. The strength of the approach lies in modeling the error probabilities based on the quality scores. Although the use of second best base calls appeared very promising in our data exploration phase, their utility was limited. They provided a slight increase in sensitivity, which however does not warrant the additional computational cost of running the offline base caller. Apparently a lot of information is already contained in the quality scores enabling the model based clustering procedure to adjust the majority of the sequencing errors. Overall the sensitivity of ViVaMBC is such that technical constraints like PCR errors start to form the bottleneck for low frequency variant detection. Bie M. P. Verbist, Lieven Clement, Joke Reumers, Kim Thys, Alexander Vapirev, Willem Talloen, Yves Wetzels, Joris Meys, Jeroen Aerssens, Luc Bijnens, Olivier Thas |
BMC Bioinform. | 4 |