Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Taesik Cheung
dblp:156/9944
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Optical networks · 50% Wireless networking · 25% Network optimization and economics · 25% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Approximation and online algorithms · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Wireless networking › scheduling › scheduling policy
priority assignment |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Priority Assignment Algorithms for Shared Mesh Protection Switching · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2019 |
Optical networks
protection switching |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Priority Assignment Algorithms for Shared Mesh Protection Switching · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2019 |
Network optimization and economics
resource sharing |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Priority Assignment Algorithms for Shared Mesh Protection Switching · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2019 |
Optical networks › protection switching
shared mesh protection |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Priority Assignment Algorithms for Shared Mesh Protection Switching · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2019 |
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Priority Assignment Algorithms for Shared Mesh Protection Switching · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
approximation algorithm · 0.8NP-hardness analysis · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Priority Assignment Algorithms for Shared Mesh Protection SwitchingabstractShared mesh protection (SMP) is a protection mechanism that recovers traffic delivery against failures on a working path as rapidly as linear protection. In addition, it allows for resource sharing among the protection paths with different endpoints in a mesh network by coordinating the use of shared resources when multiple protection paths compete for these resources. Owing to limited protection resources and the preemption in consequence of priority comparison, the SMP introduces a new optimization problem whose objective is to find the optimal priority assignment that maximizes the number of protected services against any failure case for a given SMP network. In this paper, we recognize that the problem of finding the optimal solution is NP-hard and propose min-degree and capacity-density approximation algorithms, whose approximation ratios are presented with the maximum degree of services and the maximum capacity of segments of an SMP network. Moreover, we propose a depth-based algorithm that always finds the optimal solution for a hypertree-shaped SMP network. We compare the performance of the proposed algorithms in terms of the protection ratio, which we define in this paper. Choong-Hee Cho, Taesik Cheung, Jeong-dong Ryoo |
IEEE Trans. Commun. | 2 |