Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
James H. Rogers
dblp:157/2854
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-8196-4503ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 8 · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
6 papers |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 37% High-performance computing · 27% GPUs and heterogeneous computing · 21% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GPUs and heterogeneous computing
GPU reliability |
0.7 | 3 | 2020 | GPU lifetimes on titan supercomputer: survival analysis and reliability · SC 2020 Understanding GPU errors on large-scale HPC systems and the implications for system design and operation · HPCA 2015 A large-scale study of soft-errors on GPUs in the field · HPCA 2016 |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
failure analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | GPU lifetimes on titan supercomputer: survival analysis and reliability · SC 2020 |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › reliability analysis
lifetime analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | GPU lifetimes on titan supercomputer: survival analysis and reliability · SC 2020 |
High-performance computing › supercomputing
supercomputer deployment |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | The design, deployment, and evaluation of the CORAL pre-exascale systems · SC 2018 |
High-performance computing
supercomputing |
0.3 | 2 | 2020 | Best Practices and Lessons Learned from Deploying and Operating Large-Scale Data-Centric Parallel File Systems · SC 2014 GPU lifetimes on titan supercomputer: survival analysis and reliability · SC 2020 |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
soft errors |
0.3 | 2 | 2016 | A large-scale study of soft-errors on GPUs in the field · HPCA 2016 Understanding GPU errors on large-scale HPC systems and the implications for system design and operation · HPCA 2015 |
Storage systems › file systems › distributed file system
parallel file system |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Best Practices and Lessons Learned from Deploying and Operating Large-Scale Data-Centric Parallel File Systems · SC 2014 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking |
0.2 | 2 | 2018 | The design, deployment, and evaluation of the CORAL pre-exascale systems · SC 2018 Early evaluation of IBM BlueGene/P · SC 2008 |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
system reliability |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | GPU lifetimes on titan supercomputer: survival analysis and reliability · SC 2020 |
High-performance computing › supercomputing
supercomputing systems |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Early evaluation of IBM BlueGene/P · SC 2008 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
field data analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | A large-scale study of soft-errors on GPUs in the field · HPCA 2016 |
Storage systems
storage reliability |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | Best Practices and Lessons Learned from Deploying and Operating Large-Scale Data-Centric Parallel File Systems · SC 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
time between failures analysis · 0.4statistical survival analysis · 0.4large-scale field data analysis · 0.2neutron beam experiments · 0.2field data analysis · 0.2technology evaluation · 0.2benchmarking · 0.2microbenchmarks · 0.1application benchmarks · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | A Global Perspective on Supercomputer Power Provisioning: Case Studies from United States and EuropeabstractElectrical provisioning in high performance computing is transitioning from simple nameplate Thermal Design Power (TDP) models to more nuanced approaches based on expected electrical load.This paper captures current power Tapasya Patki, Barry Rountree, Torsten Wilde, Andrea Bartolini, Stephanie Brink, Esa Heiskanen, Sachin Idgunji, Matthias Maiterth, James H. Rogers, Ermal Rrapaj, Ralf Schneider, Woong Shin, Kathleen Shoga, Christian Simmendinger, Nicholas J. Wright, Zhengji Zhao |
ICS | 9 |
| 2020 | GPU lifetimes on titan supercomputer: survival analysis and reliabilityabstractThe Cray XK7 Titan was the top supercomputer system in the world for a long time and remained critically important throughout its nearly seven year life. It was an interesting machine from a reliability viewpoint as most of its power came from 18,688 GPUs whose operation was forced to execute three rework cycles, two on the GPU mechanical assembly and one on the GPU circuitboards. We write about the last rework cycle and a reliability analysis of over 100,000 years of GPU lifetimes during Titan’s 6-year-long productive period. Using time between failures analysis and statistical survival analysis techniques, we find that GPU reliability is dependent on heat dissipation to an extent that strongly correlates with detailed nuances of the cooling architecture and job scheduling. We describe the history, data collection, cleaning, and analysis and give recommendations for future supercomputing systems. We make the data and our analysis codes publicly available. George Ostrouchov, Don E. Maxwell, Rizwan A. Ashraf, Christian Engelmann, Mallikarjun Shankar, James H. Rogers |
SC | 6 |
| 2018 | The design, deployment, and evaluation of the CORAL pre-exascale systems
Sudharshan S. Vazhkudai, Bronis R. de Supinski, Arthur S. Bland, Al Geist, James C. Sexton, James A. Kahle, Christopher Zimmer 0001, Scott Atchley, Sarp Oral, Don E. Maxwell, Verónica G. Vergara Larrea, Adam Bertsch, Robin Goldstone, Wayne Joubert, Christopher M. Chambreau, David Appelhans, Robert Blackmore, Ben Casses, George Chochia, Gene Davison, Matthew Ezell, Thomas Gooding, Elsa Gonsiorowski, Leopold Grinberg, Bill Hanson, Bill Hartner, Ian Karlin, Matthew L. Leininger, Dustin Leverman, Chris Marroquin, Adam Moody, Martin Ohmacht, Ramesh Pankajakshan, Fernando Pizzano, James H. Rogers, Bryan S. Rosenburg, Drew Schmidt, Mallikarjun Shankar, Feiyi Wang, Py Watson, Bob Walkup, Lance D. Weems, Junqi Yin |
SC | 35 |
| 2016 | A large-scale study of soft-errors on GPUs in the fieldabstractParallelism provided by the GPU architecture has enabled domain scientists to simulate physical phenomena at a much faster rate and finer granularity than what was previously possible by CPU-based large-scale clusters. Architecture researchers have been investigating reliability characteristics of GPUs and innovating techniques to increase the reliability of these emerging computing devices. Such efforts are often guided by technology projections and simplistic scientific kernels, and performed using architectural simulators and modeling tools. Lack of large-scale field data impedes the effectiveness of such efforts. This study attempts to bridge this gap by presenting a large-scale field data analysis of GPU reliability. We characterize and quantify different kinds of soft-errors on the Titan supercomputer's GPU nodes. Our study uncovers several interesting and previously unknown insights about the characteristics and impact of soft-errors. Bin Nie, Devesh Tiwari, Saurabh Gupta 0002, Evgenia Smirni, James H. Rogers |
HPCA | 5 |
| 2016 | Using Balanced Data Placement to Address I/O Contention in Production EnvironmentsabstractDesigned for capacity and capability, HPC I/O systems are inherently complex and shared among multiple, concurrent jobs competing for resources. Lack of centralized coordination and control often render the end-to-end I/O paths vulnerable to load imbalance and contention. With the emergence of data-intensive HPC applications, storage systems are further contended for performance and scalability. This paper proposes to unify two key approaches to tackle the imbalanced use of I/O resources and to achieve an end-to-end I/O performance improvement in the most transparent way. First, it utilizes a topology-aware, Balanced Placement I/O method (BPIO) for mitigating resource contention. Second, it takes advantage of the platform-neutral ADIOS middleware, which provides a flexible I/O mechanism for scientific applications. By integrating BPIO with ADIOS, referred to as Aequilibro, we obtain an end-to-end and per job I/O performance improvement for ADIOS-enabled HPC applications without requiring any code changes. Aequilibro can be applied to almost any HPC platform and is mostly suitable for systems that lack a centralized file system resource manager. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our integration on the Titan system at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Our experiments with a synthetic benchmark and real-world HPC workload show that, even in a noisy production environment, Aequilibro can improve large-scale application performance significantly. Sarah Neuwirth, Feiyi Wang, Sarp Oral, Sudharshan S. Vazhkudai, James H. Rogers, Ulrich Brüning 0001 |
SBAC-PAD | 5 |
| 2015 | Understanding and Exploiting Spatial Properties of System Failures on Extreme-Scale HPC SystemsabstractAs we approach exascale, the scientific simulations are expected to experience more interruptions due to increased system failures. Designing better HPC resilience techniques requires understanding the key characteristics of system failures on these systems. While temporal properties of system failures on HPC systems have been well-investigated, there is limited understanding about the spatial characteristics of system failures and its impact on the resilience mechanisms. Therefore, we examine the spatial characteristics and behavior of system failures. We investigate the interaction between spatial and temporal characteristics of failures and its implications for system operations and resilience mechanisms on large-scale HPC systems. We show that system failures have "spatial locality" at different granularity in the system, study impact of different failure-types, and investigate the correlation among different failure-types. Finally, we propose a novel scheme that exploits the spatial locality in failures to improve application and system performance. Our evaluation shows that the proposed scheme significantly improves the system performance in a dynamic and production-level HPC system. Saurabh Gupta 0002, Devesh Tiwari, Christopher Jantzi, James H. Rogers, Don E. Maxwell |
DSN | 4 |
| 2015 | Understanding GPU errors on large-scale HPC systems and the implications for system design and operationabstractIncrease in graphics hardware performance and improvements in programmability has enabled GPUs to evolve from a graphics-specific accelerator to a general-purpose computing device. Titan, the world's second fastest supercomputer for open science in 2014, consists of more dum 18,000 GPUs that scientists from various domains such as astrophysics, fusion, climate, and combustion use routinely to run large-scale simulations. Unfortunately, while the performance efficiency of GPUs is well understood, their resilience characteristics in a large-scale computing system have not been fully evaluated. We present a detailed study to provide a thorough understanding of GPU errors on a large-scale GPU-enabled system. Our data was collected from the Titan supercomputer at the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility and a GPU cluster at the Los Alamos National Laboratory. We also present results from our extensive neutron-beam tests, conducted at Los Alamos Neutron Science Center (LANSCE) and at ISIS (Rutherford Appleron Laboratories, UK), to measure the resilience of different generations of GPUs. We present several findings from our field data and neutron-beam experiments, and discuss the implications of our results for future GPU architects, current and future HPC computing facilities, and researchers focusing on GPU resilience. Devesh Tiwari, Saurabh Gupta 0002, James H. Rogers, Don E. Maxwell, Paolo Rech, Sudharshan S. Vazhkudai, Daniel Oliveira 0002, Dave Londo, Nathan DeBardeleben, Philippe Olivier Alexandre Navaux, Luigi Carro, Arthur S. Bland |
HPCA | 3 |
| 2014 | Best Practices and Lessons Learned from Deploying and Operating Large-Scale Data-Centric Parallel File SystemsabstractThe Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility (OLCF) has deployed multiple large-scale parallel file systems (PFS) to support its operations. During this process, OLCF acquired significant expertise in large-scale storage system design, file system software development, technology evaluation, benchmarking, procurement, deployment, and operational practices. Based on the lessons learned from each new PFS deployment, OLCF improved its operating procedures, and strategies. This paper provides an account of our experience and lessons learned in acquiring, deploying, and operating large-scale parallel file systems. We believe that these lessons will be useful to the wider HPC community. Sarp Oral, James Simmons, Jason Hill, Dustin Leverman, Feiyi Wang, Matthew Ezell, Ross G. Miller, Douglas Fuller, Raghul Gunasekaran, Youngjae Kim 0001, Saurabh Gupta 0002, Devesh Tiwari, Sudharshan S. Vazhkudai, James H. Rogers, David Dillow, Galen M. Shipman, Arthur S. Bland |
SC | 14 |
| 2008 | Early evaluation of IBM BlueGene/PabstractBlueGene/P (BG/P) is the second generation BlueGene architecture from IBM, succeeding BlueGene/L (BG/L). BG/P is a system-on-a-chip (SoC) design that uses four PowerPC 450 cores operating at 850 MHz with a double precision, dual pipe floating point unit per core. These chips are connected with multiple interconnection networks including a 3-D torus, a global collective network, and a global barrier network. The design is intended to provide a highly scalable, physically dense system with relatively low power requirements per flop. In this paper, we report on our examination of BG/P, presented in the context of a set of important scientific applications, and as compared to other major large scale supercomputers in use today. Our investigation confirms that BG/P has good scalability with an expected lower performance per processor when compared to the Cray XT4's Opteron. We also find that BG/P uses very low power per floating point operation for certain kernels, yet it has less of a power advantage when considering science driven metrics for mission applications. Sadaf R. Alam, Richard F. Barrett, M. Bast, Mark R. Fahey, Jeffery A. Kuehn, Collin McCurdy, James H. Rogers, Philip C. Roth, Ramanan Sankaran, Jeffrey S. Vetter, Patrick H. Worley, Weikuan Yu |
SC | 7 |