Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Paul Cassella
dblp:157/2862
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
High-performance computing · 44% Performance modeling and evaluation · 44% Distributed systems · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Performance modeling and evaluation › profiling
application profiling |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | The Lightweight Distributed Metric Service: A Scalable Infrastructure for Continuous Monitoring of Large Scale Computing Systems and Applications · SC 2014 |
High-performance computing
system monitoring |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | The Lightweight Distributed Metric Service: A Scalable Infrastructure for Continuous Monitoring of Large Scale Computing Systems and Applications · SC 2014 |
Distributed systems › observability
large-scale monitoring |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | The Lightweight Distributed Metric Service: A Scalable Infrastructure for Continuous Monitoring of Large Scale Computing Systems and Applications · SC 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
lightweight distributed monitoring · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | The Lightweight Distributed Metric Service: A Scalable Infrastructure for Continuous Monitoring of Large Scale Computing Systems and ApplicationsabstractUnderstanding how resources of High Performance Compute platforms are utilized by applications both individually and as a composite is key to application and platform performance. Typical system monitoring tools do not provide sufficient fidelity while application profiling tools do not capture the complex interplay between applications competing for shared resources. To gain new insights, monitoring tools must run continuously, system wide, at frequencies appropriate to the metrics of interest while having minimal impact on application performance. We introduce the Lightweight Distributed Metric Service for scalable, lightweight monitoring of large scale computing systems and applications. We describe issues and constraints guiding deployment in Sandia National Laboratories' capacity computing environment and on the National Center for Supercomputing Applications' Blue Waters platform including motivations, metrics of choice, and requirements relating to the scale and specialized nature of Blue Waters. We address monitoring overhead and impact on application performance and provide illustrative profiling results. Anthony M. Agelastos, Benjamin A. Allan, Jim M. Brandt, Paul Cassella, Jeremy Enos, Joshi Fullop, Ann C. Gentile, Steve Monk, Nichamon Naksinehaboon, Jeff Ogden, Mahesh Rajan, Michael T. Showerman, Joel Stevenson, Narate Taerat, Thomas W. Tucker |
SC | 4 |