Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Arnon Lazerson
dblp:157/3545
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0009-0008-0200-1484ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 7 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
6 papers |
Information retrieval · 51% Recommender systems · 26% Data stream processing · 20% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Distributed systems · 100% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Internet of things and sensor networks · 100% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommender systems › recommender system evaluation
off-policy evaluation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | External Evaluation of Ranking Models under Extreme Position-Bias · WSDM 2022 |
Information retrieval › user behavior › search behavior › click model
position bias correction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | External Evaluation of Ranking Models under Extreme Position-Bias · WSDM 2022 |
Information retrieval › retrieval evaluation
ranking evaluation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | External Evaluation of Ranking Models under Extreme Position-Bias · WSDM 2022 |
Recommender systems › recommender system evaluation
unbiased evaluation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | External Evaluation of Ranking Models under Extreme Position-Bias · WSDM 2022 |
Information retrieval
e-commerce search |
0.6 | 2 | 2020 | Why Do People Buy Seemingly Irrelevant Items in Voice Product Search?: On the Relation between Product Relevance and Customer Satisfaction in eCommerce · WSDM 2020 Multi-Objective Ranking Optimization for Product Search Using Stochastic Label Aggregation · WWW 2020 |
Data stream processing › stream monitoring
distributed stream monitoring |
0.5 | 2 | 2018 | Lightweight Monitoring of Distributed Streams · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 2018 Monitoring Distributed Streams using Convex Decompositions · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2015 |
Information retrieval › ranking
learning to rank |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Multi-Objective Ranking Optimization for Product Search Using Stochastic Label Aggregation · WWW 2020 |
Information retrieval › ranking
multi-objective ranking |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Multi-Objective Ranking Optimization for Product Search Using Stochastic Label Aggregation · WWW 2020 |
Data stream processing
distributed stream processing |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Lightweight Monitoring of Distributed Streams · KDD 2016 |
Distributed systems › observability
distributed monitoring |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Lightweight Monitoring of Distributed Streams · KDD 2016 |
Recommender systems › conversion rate prediction
purchase prediction |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | External Evaluation of Ranking Models under Extreme Position-Bias · WSDM 2022 |
Web and social media mining
user engagement |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Why Do People Buy Seemingly Irrelevant Items in Voice Product Search?: On the Relation between Product Relevance and Customer Satisfaction in eCommerce · WSDM 2020 |
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
energy-efficient monitoring |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Lightweight Monitoring of Distributed Streams · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 2018 |
Internet of things and sensor networks
resource-constrained devices |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Lightweight Monitoring of Distributed Streams · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
distributed stream algorithms · 0.7convex optimization · 0.7inverse propensity scoring · 0.6external estimator model · 0.6stochastic label aggregation · 0.4relevance judgment · 0.4label aggregation · 0.4behavioral analysis · 0.4covering spheres · 0.2convex decomposition · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Extended Conversion: Capturing Successful Interactions in Voice ShoppingabstractBeing able to measure the success of online shopping interactions is crucial in order to evaluate and optimize the performance of e-commerce systems. It is especially challenging in the domain of voice shopping, typically supported by voice-based AI assistants. Unlike Web shopping, which offers a rich amount of behavioral signals such as clicks, in voice shopping a non-negligible amount of shopping interactions frequently ends without any immediate explicit or implicit user behavioral signal. Moreover, users may start their journey using a voice-enabled device, but complete it elsewhere, for example on their smartphone mobile app or a Web browser. We explore the challenge of measuring successful interactions in voice product search based on users’ behavior, and propose a medium-term reward metric named Extended ConVersion (ECVR). ECVR extends the notion of conversion beyond the usual purchase action, which serves as an undisputed measure of success in e-commerce. More specifically, it also captures purchase actions that occur at a later stage during a same shopping journey, and possibly on different channel than the one on which the interaction started. In this paper, we formally define the ECVR metric, describe multiple ways of evaluating the quality of a metric, and use these to explore different parameters for ECVR. After selecting the most appropriate parameters, we show that a ranking system optimized for ECVR, set up with these parameters, leads to improvements in long-term engagement and revenue, without compromising immediate conversion gains. Elad Haramaty, Zohar S. Karnin, Arnon Lazerson, Liane Lewin-Eytan, Yoelle Maarek |
RecSys | 3 |
| 2022 | External Evaluation of Ranking Models under Extreme Position-BiasabstractImplicit feedback from users behavior is a natural and scalable source for training and evaluating ranking models in human-interactive systems. However, inherent biases such as the position bias are key obstacles to its effective usage. This is further accentuated in cases of extreme bias, where behavioral feedback can be collected exclusively on the top ranked result. In fact, in such cases, state-of-art debiasing methods cannot be applied. A prominent use case of extreme position bias is the voice shopping medium, where only a small amount of information can be presented to the user during a single interaction, resulting in user behavioral signals that are almost exclusively limited to the top offer. There is no way to know how the user would have reacted to a different offer than the top one he was actually exposed to. Thus, any new ranker we wish to evaluate with respect to a behavioral metric, requires online experimentation. We propose a novel approach, based on anexternal estimator model, for accurately predicting offline the performance of a new ranker. The accuracy of our solution is proven theoretically, as well as demonstrated by a line of experiments. In these experiments, we focus on the use case of purchase prediction, and show that our estimator can accurately predict offline the purchase rate of different rankers over a segment of voice shopping traffic. Our prediction is validated online, as being compared to the actual performance obtained by each ranker when being exposed to users. Yaron Fairstein, Elad Haramaty, Arnon Lazerson, Liane Lewin-Eytan |
WSDM | 3 |
| 2020 | Why Do People Buy Seemingly Irrelevant Items in Voice Product Search?: On the Relation between Product Relevance and Customer Satisfaction in eCommerceabstractOne emerging benefit of voice assistants is to facilitate product search experience, allowing users to express orally which products they seek, and taking actions on retrieved results such as adding them to their cart or sending the product details to their mobile phone for further examination. Looking at users' behavior in product search, supported by a digital voice assistant, we have observed an interesting phenomenon where users purchase or engage with search results that are objectively judged irrelevant to their queries. David Carmel, Elad Haramaty, Arnon Lazerson, Liane Lewin-Eytan, Yoelle Maarek |
WSDM | 3 |
| 2020 | Multi-Objective Ranking Optimization for Product Search Using Stochastic Label AggregationabstractLearning a ranking model in product search involves satisfying many requirements such as maximizing the relevance of retrieved products with respect to the user query, as well as maximizing the purchase likelihood of these products. Multi-Objective Ranking Optimization (MORO) is the task of learning a ranking model from training examples while optimizing multiple objectives simultaneously. Label aggregation is a popular solution approach for multi-objective optimization, which reduces the problem into a single objective optimization problem, by aggregating the multiple labels of the training examples, related to the different objectives, to a single label. In this work we explore several label aggregation methods for MORO in product search. We propose a novel stochastic label aggregation method which randomly selects a label per training example according to a given distribution over the labels. We provide a theoretical proof showing that stochastic label aggregation is superior to alternative aggregation approaches, in the sense that any optimal solution of the MORO problem can be generated by a proper parameter setting of the stochastic aggregation process. We experiment on three different datasets: two from the voice product search domain, and one publicly available dataset from the Web product search domain. We demonstrate empirically over these three datasets that MORO with stochastic label aggregation provides a family of ranking models that fully dominates the set of MORO models built using deterministic label aggregation. David Carmel, Elad Haramaty, Arnon Lazerson, Liane Lewin-Eytan |
WWW | 3 |
| 2018 | Lightweight Monitoring of Distributed StreamsabstractAs data becomes dynamic, large, and distributed, there is increasing demand for what have become known asdistributed stream algorithms. Since continuously collecting the data to a central server and processing it there is infeasible, a common approach is to definelocalconditions at the distributed nodes, such that—as long as they are maintained—some desirableglobalcondition holds. Previous methods derived local conditions focusing on communication efficiency. While proving very useful for reducing the communication volume, these local conditions often suffer from heavy computational burden at the nodes. The computational complexity of the local conditions affects both the runtime and the energy consumption. These are especially critical for resource-limited devices like smartphones and sensor nodes. Such devices are becoming more ubiquitous due to the recent trend toward smart cities and the Internet of Things. To accommodate for high data rates and limited resources of these devices, it is crucial that the local conditions be quickly and efficiently evaluated. Here we propose a novel approach, designated CB (for Convex/Concave Bounds). CB defines local conditions using suitably chosen convex and concave functions. Lightweight and simple, these local conditions can be rapidly checked on the fly. CB’s superiority over the state-of-the-art is demonstrated in its reduced runtime and power consumption, by up to six orders of magnitude in some cases. As an added bonus, CB also reduced communication overhead in all the tested application scenarios. Arnon Lazerson, Daniel Keren, Assaf Schuster |
ACM Trans. Database Syst. | 1 |
| 2016 | Lightweight Monitoring of Distributed StreamsabstractAs data becomes dynamic, large, and distributed, there is increasing demand for what have become known as distributed stream algorithms. Since continuously collecting the data to a central server and processing it there incurs very high communication and computation complexities, it is advantageous to define local conditions at the nodes, such that -- as long as they are maintained -- some desirable global condition holds. Arnon Lazerson, Daniel Keren, Assaf Schuster |
KDD | 1 |
| 2015 | Monitoring Distributed Streams using Convex DecompositionsabstractEmerging large-scale monitoring applications rely on continuous tracking of complex data-analysis queries over collections of massive, physically-distributed data streams. Thus, in addition to the space- and time-efficiency requirements of conventional stream processing (at each remote monitor site), effective solutions also need to guarantee communication efficiency (over the underlying communication network). The complexity of the monitored query adds to the difficulty of the problem --- this is especially true for non-linear queries (e.g., joins), where no obvious solutions exist for distributing the monitored condition across sites. The recently proposed geometric method, based on the notion of covering spheres, offers a generic methodology for splitting an arbitrary (non-linear) global condition into a collection of local site constraints, and has been applied to massive distributed stream-monitoring tasks, achieving state-of-the-art performance. In this paper, we present a far more general geometric approach, based on the convex decomposition of an appropriate subset of the domain of the monitoring query, and formally prove that it is always guaranteed to perform at least as good as the covering spheres method. We analyze our approach and demonstrate its effectiveness for the important case of sketch-based approximate tracking for norm, range-aggregate, and join-aggregate queries , which have numerous applications in streaming data analysis. Experimental results on real-life data streams verify the superiority of our approach in practical settings, showing that it substantially outperforms the covering spheres method. Arnon Lazerson, Izchak Sharfman, Daniel Keren, Assaf Schuster, Minos N. Garofalakis, Vasilis Samoladas |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 1 |