Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ian Char

dblp:157/7519 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 2 first-author · 6 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
7 papers
Reinforcement learning · 39% Trustworthy machine learning · 20% Motion planning and robot control · 19%

Topics — the 23 heaviest of 24, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
1.322024
Sampling-based Multi-dimensional Recalibration · ICML 2024
Beyond Pinball Loss: Quantile Methods for Calibrated Uncertainty Quantification · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
exploration
1.222023
Near-optimal Policy Identification in Active Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2023
Exploration via Planning for Information about the Optimal Trajectory · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
probability calibration
0.812024
Sampling-based Multi-dimensional Recalibration · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › partially observable reinforcement learning
history representation
0.712023
PID-Inspired Inductive Biases for Deep Reinforcement Learning in Partially Observable Control Tasks · NeurIPS 2023
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
locomotion control
0.712023
PID-Inspired Inductive Biases for Deep Reinforcement Learning in Partially Observable Control Tasks · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning theory
near-optimal policy identification
0.712023
Near-optimal Policy Identification in Active Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
partially observable reinforcement learning
0.712023
PID-Inspired Inductive Biases for Deep Reinforcement Learning in Partially Observable Control Tasks · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization
0.712023
Near-optimal Policy Identification in Active Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2023
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.712023
PID-Inspired Inductive Biases for Deep Reinforcement Learning in Partially Observable Control Tasks · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
information-theoretic exploration
0.612022
Exploration via Planning for Information about the Optimal Trajectory · NeurIPS 2022
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory optimization
0.612022
Exploration via Planning for Information about the Optimal Trajectory · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference
0.612022
Deep Attentive Variational Inference · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
calibration
0.512021
Beyond Pinball Loss: Quantile Methods for Calibrated Uncertainty Quantification · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression
quantile regression
0.512021
Beyond Pinball Loss: Quantile Methods for Calibrated Uncertainty Quantification · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization
0.412019
Offline Contextual Bayesian Optimization · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
black-box optimization
0.412019
Offline Contextual Bayesian Optimization · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
contextual bayesian optimization
0.412019
Offline Contextual Bayesian Optimization · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › optimization
offline optimization
0.412019
Offline Contextual Bayesian Optimization · NeurIPS 2019
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
tracking control
0.212023
PID-Inspired Inductive Biases for Deep Reinforcement Learning in Partially Observable Control Tasks · NeurIPS 2023
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
trajectory tracking
0.212023
PID-Inspired Inductive Biases for Deep Reinforcement Learning in Partially Observable Control Tasks · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
sample efficiency
0.212022
Exploration via Planning for Information about the Optimal Trajectory · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
multi-task optimization
0.112019
Offline Contextual Bayesian Optimization · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › curriculum reinforcement learning
task selection
0.112019
Offline Contextual Bayesian Optimization · NeurIPS 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sampling · 0.8bootstrap · 0.8reinforcement learning · 0.7recurrent neural network · 0.7active learning · 0.7PID control · 0.7variational inference · 0.6planning for exploration · 0.6expected information gain · 0.6attention · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Sampling-based Multi-dimensional Recalibration
abstract
Calibration of probabilistic forecasts in the regression setting has been widely studied in the single dimensional case, where the output variables are assumed to be univariate. In many problem settings, however, the output variables are multi-dimensional, and in the presence of dependence across the output dimensions, measuring calibration and performing recalibration for each dimension separately can be both misleading and detrimental. In this work, we focus on representing predictive uncertainties via samples, and propose a recalibration method which accounts for the joint distribution across output dimensions to produce calibrated samples. Based on the concept of highest density regions (HDR), we define the notion of HDR calibration, and show that our recalibration method produces samples which are HDR calibrated. We demonstrate the performance of our method and the quality of the recalibrated samples on a suite of benchmark datasets in multi-dimensional regression, a real-world dataset in modeling plasma dynamics during nuclear fusion reactions, and on a decision-making application in forecasting demand.
Youngseog Chung, Ian Char, Jeff G. Schneider
ICML2
2023 Near-optimal Policy Identification in Active Reinforcement Learning
Viraj Mehta, Johannes Kirschner, Ian Char, Willie Neiswanger, Jeff G. Schneider, Andreas Krause 0001, Ilija Bogunovic
ICLR4
2023 PID-Inspired Inductive Biases for Deep Reinforcement Learning in Partially Observable Control Tasks
abstract
Deep reinforcement learning (RL) has shown immense potential for learning to control systems through data alone. However, one challenge deep RL faces is that the full state of the system is often not observable. When this is the case, the policy needs to leverage the history of observations to infer the current state. At the same time, differences between the training and testing environments makes it critical for the policy not to overfit to the sequence of observations it sees at training time. As such, there is an important balancing act between having the history encoder be flexible enough to extract relevant information, yet be robust to changes in the environment. To strike this balance, we look to the PID controller for inspiration. We assert the PID controller's success shows that only summing and differencing are needed to accumulate information over time for many control tasks. Following this principle, we propose two architectures for encoding history: one that directly uses PID features and another that extends these core ideas and can be used in arbitrary control tasks. When compared with prior approaches, our encoders produce policies that are often more robust and achieve better performance on a variety of tracking tasks. Going beyond tracking tasks, our policies achieve 1.7x better performance on average over previous state-of-the-art methods on a suite of locomotion control tasks.
Ian Char, Jeff G. Schneider
NeurIPS1
2022 Deep Attentive Variational Inference
Ifigeneia Apostolopoulou, Ian Char, Elan Rosenfeld, Artur Dubrawski
ICLR2
2022 Exploration via Planning for Information about the Optimal Trajectory
abstract
Many potential applications of reinforcement learning (RL) are stymied by the large numbers of samples required to learn an effective policy. This is especially true when applying RL to real-world control tasks, e.g. in the sciences or robotics, where executing a policy in the environment is costly. In popular RL algorithms, agents typically explore either by adding stochasticity to a reward-maximizing policy or by attempting to gather maximal information about environment dynamics without taking the given task into account. In this work, we develop a method that allows us to plan for exploration while taking both the task and the current knowledge about the dynamics into account. The key insight to our approach is to plan an action sequence that maximizes the expected information gain about the optimal trajectory for the task at hand. We demonstrate that our method learns strong policies with 2x fewer samples than strong exploration baselines and 200x fewer samples than model free methods on a diverse set of low-to-medium dimensional control tasks in both the open-loop and closed-loop control settings.
Viraj Mehta, Ian Char, Joseph Abbate, Rory Conlin, Mark D. Boyer, Stefano Ermon, Jeff G. Schneider, Willie Neiswanger
NeurIPS2
2021 Beyond Pinball Loss: Quantile Methods for Calibrated Uncertainty Quantification
abstract
Among the many ways of quantifying uncertainty in a regression setting, specifying the full quantile function is attractive, as quantiles are amenable to interpretation and evaluation. A model that predicts the true conditional quantiles for each input, at all quantile levels, presents a correct and efficient representation of the underlying uncertainty. To achieve this, many current quantile-based methods focus on optimizing the pinball loss. However, this loss restricts the scope of applicable regression models, limits the ability to target many desirable properties (e.g. calibration, sharpness, centered intervals), and may produce poor conditional quantiles. In this work, we develop new quantile methods that address these shortcomings. In particular, we propose methods that can apply to any class of regression model, select an explicit balance between calibration and sharpness, optimize for calibration of centered intervals, and produce more accurate conditional quantiles. We provide a thorough experimental evaluation of our methods, which includes a high dimensional uncertainty quantification task in nuclear fusion.
Youngseog Chung, Willie Neiswanger, Ian Char, Jeff G. Schneider
NeurIPS3
2019 Offline Contextual Bayesian Optimization
abstract
In black-box optimization, an agent repeatedly chooses a configuration to test, so as to find an optimal configuration. In many practical problems of interest, one would like to optimize several systems, or tasks'', simultaneously; however, in most of these scenarios the current task is determined by nature. In this work, we explore theoffline'' case in which one is able to bypass nature and choose the next task to evaluate (e.g. via a simulator). Because some tasks may be easier to optimize and others may be more critical, it is crucial to leverage algorithms that not only consider which configurations to try next, but also which tasks to make evaluations for. In this work, we describe a theoretically grounded Bayesian optimization method to tackle this problem. We also demonstrate that if the model of the reward structure does a poor job of capturing variation in difficulty between tasks, then algorithms that actively pick tasks for evaluation may end up doing more harm than good. Following this, we show how our approach can be used for real world applications in science and engineering, including optimizing tokamak controls for nuclear fusion.
Ian Char, Youngseog Chung, Willie Neiswanger, Kirthevasan Kandasamy, Oak Nelson, Mark D. Boyer, Egemen Kolemen
NeurIPS1
2014 Toward a non-intrusive, physio- behavioral biometric for smartphones
abstract
Biometric authentication relies on an individual's inner characteristics and traits. We propose an active authentication system on a mobile device that relies on two biometric modalities: 3D gestures and face recognition. The novelty of our approach is to combine 3D gesture and face recognition in a nonintrusive and unconstrained environment; the active authentication system is running in the background while the user is performing his/her main task.
Esther Vasiete, Yan Chen 0033, Ian Char, Tom Yeh, Vishal M. Patel, Larry Davis 0001, Rama Chellappa
Mobile HCI3