EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Cupjin Huang
dblp:157/8312
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-7466-8033ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 4 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Emerging computing paradigms · 82% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 11% Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs · 7% | |
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Quantum computing and quantum information · 39% Computational complexity · 28% Coding theory · 22% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Compilers and program optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Emerging computing paradigms
quantum computer architecture |
1.8 | 2 | 2026 | Reconfigurable Quantum Instruction Set Computers for High Performance Attainable on Hardware · ASPLOS (2) 2026 One Gate Scheme to Rule Them All: Introducing a Complex Yet Reduced Instruction Set for Quantum Computing · ASPLOS (2) 2024 |
Emerging computing paradigms › quantum computer architecture › quantum software stack
quantum instruction set |
1.8 | 2 | 2026 | Reconfigurable Quantum Instruction Set Computers for High Performance Attainable on Hardware · ASPLOS (2) 2026 One Gate Scheme to Rule Them All: Introducing a Complex Yet Reduced Instruction Set for Quantum Computing · ASPLOS (2) 2024 |
Compilers and program optimization › compiler optimization
quantum compiler optimization |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Reconfigurable Quantum Instruction Set Computers for High Performance Attainable on Hardware · ASPLOS (2) 2026 |
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum gates |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | One Gate Scheme to Rule Them All: Introducing a Complex Yet Reduced Instruction Set for Quantum Computing · ASPLOS (2) 2024 |
Computational complexity
fine-grained complexity |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Explicit Lower Bounds on Strong Quantum Simulation · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2020 |
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum circuit simulation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Explicit Lower Bounds on Strong Quantum Simulation · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2020 |
Computational complexity › fine-grained complexity › conditional lower bounds
SETH-based lower bounds |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Explicit Lower Bounds on Strong Quantum Simulation · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2020 |
Information theory › network information theory › network capacity
cut-set bound |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Comments on Cut-Set Bounds on Network Function Computation · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2018 |
Coding theory
network coding |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Comments on Cut-Set Bounds on Network Function Computation · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2018 |
Coding theory › network coding › network computing
network function computation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Comments on Cut-Set Bounds on Network Function Computation · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2018 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture › instruction set architecture
instruction set design |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | One Gate Scheme to Rule Them All: Introducing a Complex Yet Reduced Instruction Set for Quantum Computing · ASPLOS (2) 2024 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture › instruction set architecture
RISC |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | One Gate Scheme to Rule Them All: Introducing a Complex Yet Reduced Instruction Set for Quantum Computing · ASPLOS (2) 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
basis gate synthesis · 2.0XX+YY coupling · 1.5SU(4) group · 1.5stabilizer rank · 0.4sparsification lemma · 0.4equivalence relation · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Reconfigurable Quantum Instruction Set Computers for High Performance Attainable on HardwareabstractDespite remarkable milestones in quantum computing, the performance of current quantum hardware remains limited. One critical path to higher performance is to expand the quantum ISA with basis gates that have higher fidelity and greater synthesis capabilities than the standard CNOT. However, this substantially increases gate calibration overhead and introduces challenges in compiler optimization. Consequently, although more expressive ISAs (even complex, continuous gate sets) have been proposed, they still remain primarily proofs-of-concept and have not been widely adopted. Dawei Ding 0002, Qi Ye 0005, Cupjin Huang, Yuan Xie 0001 |
ASPLOS (2) | 4 |
| 2024 | One Gate Scheme to Rule Them All: Introducing a Complex Yet Reduced Instruction Set for Quantum ComputingabstractThe design and architecture of a quantum instruction set are paramount to the performance of a quantum computer. This work introduces a gate scheme for qubits with XX + YY coupling that directly and efficiently realizes any two-qubit gate up to single-qubit gates. First, this scheme enables high-fidelity execution of quantum operations, especially when decoherence is the primary error source. Second, since the scheme spans the entire SU(4) group of two-qubit gates, we can use it to attain the optimal two-qubit gate count for algorithm implementation. These two advantages in synergy give rise to a quantum Complex yet Reduced Instruction Set Computer (CRISC). Though the gate scheme is compact, it supports a comprehensive array of quantum operations. This may seem paradoxical but is realizable due to the fundamental differences between quantum and classical computer architectures. Dawei Ding 0002, Weiyuan Gong, Cupjin Huang, Qi Ye 0005 |
ASPLOS (2) | 4 |
| 2024 | A Classical Architecture for Digital Quantum ComputersabstractScaling bottlenecks the making of digital quantum computers, posing challenges from both the quantum and the classical components. We present a classical architecture to cope with a comprehensive list of the latter challenges all at once , and implement it fully in an end-to-end system by integrating a multi-core RISC-V CPU with our in-house control electronics. Our architecture enables scalable, high-precision control of large quantum processors and accommodates evolving requirements of quantum hardware. A central feature is a microarchitecture executing quantum operations in parallel on arbitrary predefined qubit groups. Another key feature is a reconfigurable quantum instruction set that supports easy qubit re-grouping and instructions extensions. As a demonstration, we implement the widely-studied surface code quantum computing workflow, which is instructive for being demanding on both the controllers and the integrated classical computation. Our design, for the first time, reduces instruction issuing and transmission costs to constants, which do not scale with the number of qubits, without adding any overheads in decoding or dispatching. Our system uses a dedicated general-purpose CPU for both qubit control and classical computation, including syndrome decoding. Implementing recent theoretical proposals as decoding firmware that parallelizes general inner decoders, we can achieve unprecedented decoding capabilities of up to distances 47 and 67 with the currently available systems-on-chips for physical error rate p = 0.001 and p = 0.0001, respectively, all in just 1 μs. Rui Chao, Cupjin Huang, Linghang Kong, Guoyang Chen, Dawei Ding 0002, Haishan Feng, Yihuai Gao, Xiaotong Ni, Liwei Qiu, Yueming Yang, Yaoyun Shi, Weifeng Zhang 0003, Peng Zhou 0030 |
ACM Trans. Quantum Comput. | 4 |
| 2020 | Explicit Lower Bounds on Strong Quantum SimulationabstractWe consider the problem of classical strong (amplitude-wise) simulation of n-qubit quantum circuits, and identify a subclass of simulators we call monotone. This subclass encompasses almost all prominent simulation techniques. We prove an unconditional (i.e. without relying on any complexity-theoretic assumptions) and explicit (n - 2)(2n-3- 1) lower bound on the running time of simulators within this subclass. Assuming the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH), we further remark that a universal simulator computing any amplitude to precision 2-n/2 must take at least 2n-o(n)time. We then compare strong simulators to existing SAT solvers, and identify the time-complexity below which a strong simulator would improve on state-of-the-art general SAT solving. Finally, we investigate Clifford+T quantum circuits with t T-gates. Using the sparsification lemma, we identify a time complexity lower bound of 22.2451×10-8tbelow which a strong simulator would improve on state-of-the-art 3-SAT solving. This also yields a conditional exponential lower bound on the growth of the stabilizer rank of magic states. Cupjin Huang, Michael Newman, Mario Szegedy |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 1 |
| 2018 | Comments on Cut-Set Bounds on Network Function ComputationabstractA function computation problem over a directed acyclic network has been considered in the literature, where a sink node is required to compute a target function correctly with the inputs arbitrarily generated at multiple source nodes. The network links are error free but capacity limited, and the intermediate nodes perform network coding. The computing rate of a network code is the average number of times that the target function is computed for one use of the network, i.e., each link in the network is used at most once. In the existing papers, two cut-set bounds were proposed on the computing rate. However, we in this paper show that these bounds are not valid for general network function computation problems. We analyze the reason of the invalidity and propose a general cut-set bound by using a new equivalence relation associated with the inputs of the target function. Moreover, some results in the existing papers were proved by applying the invalid upper bound. We also justify the validity of these results. Cupjin Huang, Zihan Tan, Shenghao Yang 0001, Xuan Guang |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 1 |
| 2015 | Upper bound on function computation in directed acyclic networksabstractFunction computation in directed acyclic networks is considered, where a sink node wants to compute a target function with the inputs generated at multiple source nodes. The network links are error-free but capacity-limited, and the intermediate network nodes perform network coding. The target function is required to be computed with zero error. The computing rate of a network code is measured by the average number of times that the target function can be computed for one use of the network. We propose a cut-set bound on the computing rate using an equivalence relation associated with the inputs of the target function. Our bound holds for general target functions and network topologies. We also show that our bound is tight for some special cases where the computing capacity can be characterized. Cupjin Huang, Zihan Tan, Shenghao Yang 0001 |
ITW | 1 |