Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Robert Tubb

dblp:157/8763 · also Robert H. Tubb · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Interaction techniques and input · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Audio and music processing · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Audio and music processing
sound design
0.212015
An Evaluation of Multidimensional Controllers for Sound Design Tasks · CHI 2015
Interaction techniques and input › target selection › pointing
fitts' law
0.112015
An Evaluation of Multidimensional Controllers for Sound Design Tasks · CHI 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

fitts' law · 0.4controlled experiment · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 An Evaluation of Multidimensional Controllers for Sound Design Tasks
abstract
This paper presents an investigation into musicians' ability to control sound synthesiser parameters using various inter- faces. The principal aim was to compare separate, 1D parameter controls (touchscreen sliders) to multidimensional con- trollers (an XY touchpad for 2D, the Leap Motion for 3D). Subjects had to match a target sound as quickly and accurately as possible. Results show that after about two hours of practice, the XY pad is 9% faster than two sliders for no accuracy loss, and the Leap is 17% faster than 3 sliders with 9% accuracy loss. The multidimensional controllers improved most with practice. A new perspective on Fitts' index of difficulty is presented: "Index of Search Space Reduction" (ISSR). ISSR and retrospective accuracy thresholds on the search trajectory are used to obtain straight line plots and throughput values. These plots reveal that the Leap's speed improvement was mainly due to reaction time, but the XY pad traversed the space faster.
Robert Tubb, Simon Dixon
CHI1
2014 A Four Strategy Model of Creative Parameter Space Interaction
Robert Tubb, Simon Dixon
ICCC1