Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Anuj K. Pradhan

dblp:157/8844 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0002-7612-4208ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Autonomous driving · 67% Motion planning and robot control · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning
0.412020
Analysis and Prediction of Pedestrian Crosswalk Behavior during Automated Vehicle Interactions · ICRA 2020
Robotics › Autonomous driving › interaction modeling
pedestrian interaction
0.412020
Analysis and Prediction of Pedestrian Crosswalk Behavior during Automated Vehicle Interactions · ICRA 2020
Robotics › Autonomous driving › trajectory prediction
pedestrian trajectory prediction
0.412020
Analysis and Prediction of Pedestrian Crosswalk Behavior during Automated Vehicle Interactions · ICRA 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

immersive virtual environment · 0.4hybrid systems model · 0.4gap acceptance model · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Evaluating Effects of Cognitive Load, Takeover Request Lead Time, and Traffic Density on Drivers' Takeover Performance in Conditionally Automated Driving
abstract
In conditionally automated driving, drivers engaged in non-driving related tasks (NDRTs) have difficulty taking over control of the vehicle when requested. This study aimed to examine the relationships between takeover performance and drivers’ cognitive load, takeover request (TOR) lead time, and traffic density. We conducted a driving simulation experiment with 80 participants, where they experienced 8 takeover events. For each takeover event, drivers’ subjective ratings of takeover readiness, objective measures of takeover timing and quality, and NDRT performance were collected. Results showed that drivers had lower takeover readiness and worse performance when they were in high cognitive load, short TOR lead time, and heavy oncoming traffic density conditions. Interestingly, if drivers had low cognitive load, they paid more attention to driving environments and responded more quickly to takeover requests in high oncoming traffic conditions. The results have implications for the design of in-vehicle alert systems to help improve takeover performance.
Na Du, Jinyong Kim, Feng Zhou 0003, Elizabeth Pulver, Dawn M. Tilbury, Lionel P. Robert Jr., Anuj K. Pradhan, Xi Jessie Yang
AutomotiveUI7
2020 Analysis and Prediction of Pedestrian Crosswalk Behavior during Automated Vehicle Interactions
abstract
For safe navigation around pedestrians, automated vehicles (AVs) need to plan their motion by accurately predicting pedestrians' trajectories over long time horizons. Current approaches to AV motion planning around crosswalks predict only for short time horizons (1-2 s) and are based on data from pedestrian interactions with human-driven vehicles (HDVs). In this paper, we develop a hybrid systems model that uses pedestrians' gap acceptance behavior and constant velocity dynamics for long-term pedestrian trajectory prediction when interacting with AVs. Results demonstrate the applicability of the model for long-term (> 5 s) pedestrian trajectory prediction at crosswalks. Further, we compared measures of pedestrian crossing behaviors in the immersive virtual environment (when interacting with AVs) to that in the real world (results of published studies of pedestrians interacting with HDVs), and found similarities between the two. These similarities demonstrate the applicability of the hybrid model of AV interactions developed from an immersive virtual environment (IVE) for real-world scenarios for both AVs and HDVs.
Suresh Kumaar Jayaraman, Dawn M. Tilbury, Xi Jessie Yang, Anuj K. Pradhan, Lionel P. Robert Jr.
ICRA4