Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yujin Jeong
dblp:158/0915
· DBLP profile ↗
13ranked-venue papers
5as first author
12since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 5 first-author · 9 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Generative modeling · 32% Vision and language · 22% Trustworthy machine learning · 15% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Audio and music processing · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Information theory · 100% |
Topics — the 18 heaviest of 20, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
spatial reasoning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Diagnosing Spatial Consistency across Perspectives and Viewpoints in Large Vision-Language Models · ACL (1) 2026 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › compositionality
compositional understanding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Diffusion Classifiers Understand Compositionality, but Conditions Apply · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › visual reasoning
compositional visual reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Diffusion Classifiers Understand Compositionality, but Conditions Apply · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › diffusion-based perception
diffusion classifier |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Diffusion Classifiers Understand Compositionality, but Conditions Apply · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation › predictive uncertainty
distributional uncertainty |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Calibrated Inference: Statistical Inference that Accounts for Both Sampling Uncertainty and Distributional Uncertainty · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
statistical inference |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Calibrated Inference: Statistical Inference that Accounts for Both Sampling Uncertainty and Distributional Uncertainty · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › text-to-image generation
text-to-image diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Diffusion Classifiers Understand Compositionality, but Conditions Apply · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
zero-shot learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Zero-Shot Compositional Video Learning with Coding Rate Reduction · ICCV 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein function prediction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Structure-guided sequence representation learning for generalizable protein function prediction · Bioinform. 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural bioinformatics
protein structure |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Structure-guided sequence representation learning for generalizable protein function prediction · Bioinform. 2025 |
Audio and music processing
sound synthesis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Read, Watch and Scream! Sound Generation from Text and Video · AAAI 2025 |
Audio and music processing › sound synthesis
text-to-audio generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Read, Watch and Scream! Sound Generation from Text and Video · AAAI 2025 |
Audio and music processing › sound synthesis
video-to-audio generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Read, Watch and Scream! Sound Generation from Text and Video · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
video generation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | The Power of Sound (TPoS): Audio Reactive Video Generation with Stable Diffusion · ICCV 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.5 | 2 | 2025 | Diffusion Classifiers Understand Compositionality, but Conditions Apply · NeurIPS 2025 Read, Watch and Scream! Sound Generation from Text and Video · AAAI 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
vision-language model evaluation |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Diagnosing Spatial Consistency across Perspectives and Viewpoints in Large Vision-Language Models · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
distributional shift |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Calibrated Inference: Statistical Inference that Accounts for Both Sampling Uncertainty and Distributional Uncertainty · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Calibrated Inference: Statistical Inference that Accounts for Both Sampling Uncertainty and Distributional Uncertainty · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multimodal diffusion · 1.7energy estimation · 1.7coding rate reduction · 1.7audio encoder · 1.3benchmark construction · 1.0VQA · 1.0zero-shot classification · 0.9stability analysis · 0.9multi-task learning · 0.9graph neural network · 0.9diffusion model · 0.9confidence intervals · 0.9attention pooling · 0.9latent diffusion model · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Diagnosing Spatial Consistency across Perspectives and Viewpoints in Large Vision-Language ModelsabstractConsistent reasoning about 3D spatial relations across changing viewpoints is fundamental for Embodied AI agents operating in dynamic environments.While Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have advanced multimodal perception, their ability to maintain spatial consistency across diverse perspectives remains underexplored.Existing benchmarks primarily assess spatial capabilities from a static, single-view, and egocentric perspective, failing to capture the dynamic nature of real-world spatial cognition.To address this gap, we introduce SCOPE (Spatial COnsistency across PErspectives and Viewpoints), a comprehensive benchmark designed to rigorously diagnose spatial reasoning capabilities.Grounded in human cognitive theories of dual spatial representations, SCOPE discretizes the 360 • field into multiview scenarios to systematically evaluate both allocentric and egocentric reasoning capabilities.Our dataset comprises 20.1K spatial VQA pairs derived from high-quality 3D environments.Through an extensive evaluation of 26 state-of-the-art LVLMs, we identify two fundamental limitations that prevent consistent spatial understanding across viewpoints.We hope SCOPE facilitates the diagnosis of spatial reasoning, serving as a stepping stone toward reliable embodied action. Yujin Jeong, Sung-Bae Cho |
ACL (1) | 3 |
| 2026 | Adaptive Beam Search with Shannon Entropy for Data-Centric Reasoning in LLMs
Yujin Jeong, Sung-Bae Cho |
PAKDD (4) | 2 |
| 2025 | SPipe: Hybrid GPU and CPU Pipeline for Training LLMs under Memory PressureabstractTraining large language models (LLMs) with limited computing resources is challenging because of their immense memory space requirements. In this paper, we specifically focus on the scenarios where we have insufficient aggregate GPU memory to store all model states but explore pipeline parallelism and offloading across all system resources to train the model. In this context, SPipe presents a hybrid GPU and CPU pipelining mechanism that consists of two pipelines: a GPU pipeline to reduce the bubbles in conventional pipeline parallelism and a GPU-CPU pipeline to alleviate data transfer overhead and CPU bottlenecks in offloading data and computation. We evaluate SPipe for training LLMs of various sizes with diverse configurations in practice. The result indicates that SPipe outperforms the state-of-the-art by $1.26 \times$. Junyeol Ryu, Yujin Jeong, Daeyoung Park, Jinpyo Kim, Heehoon Kim, Jaejin Lee |
PACT | 2 |
| 2025 | Read, Watch and Scream! Sound Generation from Text and VideoabstractDespite the impressive progress of multimodal generative models, video-to-audio generation still suffers from limited performance and limits the flexibility to prioritize sound synthesis for specific objects within the scene. Conversely, text-to-audio generation methods generate high-quality audio but pose challenges in ensuring comprehensive scene depiction and time-varying control. To tackle these challenges, we propose a novel video-and-text-to-audio generation method, called ReWaS, where video serves as a conditional control for a text-to-audio generation model. Especially, our method estimates the structural information of sound (namely, energy) from the video while receiving key content cues from a user prompt. We employ a well-performing text-to-audio model to consolidate the video control, which is much more efficient for training multimodal diffusion models with massive triplet-paired (audio-video-text) data. In addition, by separating the generative components of audio, it becomes a more flexible system that allows users to freely adjust the energy, surrounding environment, and primary sound source according to their preferences. Experimental results demonstrate that our method shows superiority in terms of quality, controllability, and training efficiency. Yujin Jeong, Yunji Kim, Sanghyuk Chun, Jiyoung Lee 0005 |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2025 | Exploring the role of visual attention in relational reasoning across two cultures
Alexandra Carstensen, Shanthi Varshini Kuppa, Yujin Jeong, Meizi Jin, Ai Nghi Diep, Youngon Choi, Caren M. Walker |
CogSci | 4 |
| 2025 | Zero-Shot Compositional Video Learning with Coding Rate Reduction
Heeseok Jung, Jun-Hyeon Bak, Yujin Jeong, Gyugeun Lee, Jinwoo Ahn, Eun-Sol Kim |
ICCV | 3 |
| 2025 | Diffusion Classifiers Understand Compositionality, but Conditions ApplyabstractUnderstanding visual scenes is fundamental to human intelligence. While discriminative models have significantly advanced computer vision, they often struggle with compositional understanding. In contrast, recent generative text-to-image diffusion models excel at synthesizing complex scenes, suggesting inherent compositional capabilities.Building on this, zero-shot diffusion classifiers have been proposed to repurpose diffusion models for discriminative tasks. While prior work offered promising results in discriminative compositional scenarios, these results remain preliminary due to a small number of benchmarks and a relatively shallow analysis of conditions under which the models succeed. To address this, we present a comprehensive study of the discriminative capabilities of diffusion classifiers on a wide range of compositional tasks. Specifically, our study covers three diffusion models (SD 1.5, 2.0, and, for the first time, 3-m) spanning 10 datasets and over 30 tasks. Further, we shed light on the role that target dataset domains play in respective performance; to isolate the domain effects, we introduce a new diagnostic benchmark \textsc{Self-Bench} comprised of images created by diffusion models themselves. Finally, we explore the importance of timestep weighting and uncover a relationship between domain gap and timestep sensitivity, particularly for SD3-m.To sum up, diffusion classifiers understand compositionality, but conditions apply! Code and dataset are available at https://github.com/eugene6923/Diffusion-Classifiers-Compositionality Yujin Jeong, Arnas Uselis, Seong Joon Oh, Anna Rohrbach |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2025 | Structure-guided sequence representation learning for generalizable protein function predictionabstractMOTIVATION: Accurately predicting protein function from sequence remains a fundamental yet challenging goal in computational biology. Although recent advances have enabled the reliable prediction of protein 3D structures from sequences, utilizing structural information alone for functional inference has shown limited success. To address this gap, previous work has explored the integration of sequence and structural data by representing proteins as graphs, where residues are modeled as nodes, and spatial proximity defines edges. However, since the number of amino acids can vary significantly between proteins, the resulting graphs, constructed based on amino acids, also differ greatly in size. This large variation poses a challenge, as it becomes extremely difficult to extract generalizable information from graphs of such differing scales accurately. In this work, we propose Structure-guided Sequence Representation Learning, a novel framework that incorporates structural knowledge to extract informative, multiscale features directly from protein sequences. By embedding structural information into a sequence-based learning paradigm, our method captures functionally meaningful representations more effectively. Furthermore, we present a generalizable model architecture designed for multitask learning and inference, offering improved performance and flexibility over traditional task-specific approaches to protein function prediction. RESULTS: In this article, we demonstrate that the proposed novel attention pooling method on protein graphs effectively integrates global structural features and local chemical properties of amino acids in various-length proteins. Through this approach, we improve performance in tasks related to predicting protein functions, functional expression sites, and their relationships with structure and sequence. By effectively extracting the information needed to predict multiple protein functions simultaneously, we improve efficiency by eliminating the need for separate learning. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The code implementation is available at https://github.com/vanha9/S2RL_protein and has also been archived on zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16441001. Seokjun On, Yujin Jeong, Eun-Sol Kim |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2025 | Calibrated Inference: Statistical Inference that Accounts for Both Sampling Uncertainty and Distributional UncertaintyabstractHow can we draw trustworthy scientific conclusions? One criterion is that a study can be replicated by independent teams. While replication is critically important, it is arguably insufficient. If a study is biased for some reason and other studies recapitulate the approach then findings might be consistently incorrect. It has been argued that trustworthy scientific conclusions require disparate sources of evidence. However, different methods might have shared biases, making it difficult to judge the trustworthiness of a result. We formalize this issue by introducing a "distributional uncertainty model", wherein dense distributional shifts emerge as the superposition of numerous small random changes. The distributional perturbation model arises under a symmetry assumption on distributional shifts and is strictly weaker than assuming that the data is i.i.d. from the target distribution. We show that a stability analysis on a single data set allows us to construct confidence intervals that account for both sampling uncertainty and distributional uncertainty. Yujin Jeong, Dominik Rothenhäusler |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2023 | The Power of Sound (TPoS): Audio Reactive Video Generation with Stable DiffusionabstractIn recent years, video generation has become a prominent generative tool and has drawn significant attention. However, there is little consideration in audio-to-video generation, though audio contains unique qualities like temporal semantics and magnitude. Hence, we propose The Power of Sound (TPoS) model to incorporate audio input that includes both changeable temporal semantics and magnitude. To generate video frames, TPoS utilizes a latent stable diffusion model with textual semantic information, which is then guided by the sequential audio embedding from our pretrained Audio Encoder. As a result, this method produces audio reactive video contents. We demonstrate the effectiveness of TPoS across various tasks and compare its results with current state-of-the-art techniques in the field of audio-to-video generation. More examples are available at https://ku-vai.github.io/TPoS/ Yujin Jeong, Wonjeong Ryoo, Dabin Seo, Wonmin Byeon, Sangpil Kim, Jinkyu Kim 0001 |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2022 | Zero-shot Visual Commonsense Immorality Prediction
Yujin Jeong, Seongbeom Park, Suhong Moon |
BMVC | 1 |
| 2021 | TechWord: Development of a technology lexical database for structuring textual technology information based on natural language processing
Hyejin Jang, Yujin Jeong, Byungun Yoon |
Expert Syst. Appl. | 2 |
| 2015 | Technology-driven roadmaps for identifying new product/market opportunities: Use of text mining and quality function deployment
Gyungmi Jin, Yujin Jeong, Byungun Yoon |
Adv. Eng. Informatics | 2 |