Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Gunnam Aneeja
dblp:158/4187 · also G. Aneeja
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Audio and music processing · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Audio and music processing
speech processing |
0.5 | 2 | 2017 | Extraction of Fundamental Frequency From Degraded Speech Using Temporal Envelopes at High SNR Frequencies · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2017 Single Frequency Filtering Approach for Discriminating Speech and Nonspeech · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2015 |
Audio and music processing › speech analysis
fundamental frequency estimation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Extraction of Fundamental Frequency From Degraded Speech Using Temporal Envelopes at High SNR Frequencies · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2017 |
Audio and music processing › speech processing
speech/nonspeech discrimination |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Single Frequency Filtering Approach for Discriminating Speech and Nonspeech · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2015 |
Audio and music processing › speech processing
voice activity detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Single Frequency Filtering Approach for Discriminating Speech and Nonspeech · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
single frequency filtering · 0.5autocorrelation · 0.3adaptive multi-rate VAD · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Detection of Glottal Closure Instants in Degraded Speech Using Single Frequency Filtering Analysis
Gunnam Aneeja, Sudarsana Reddy Kadiri, Bayya Yegnanarayana |
INTERSPEECH | 1 |
| 2017 | Extraction of Fundamental Frequency From Degraded Speech Using Temporal Envelopes at High SNR FrequenciesabstractIn this paper we propose a method for extracting the fundamental frequency (fo) from degraded speech signals using single frequency filtering (SFF) approach. The SFF of frequency-shifted speech signal gives high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) segments at some frequencies and hence the SFF approach can be exploited for foextraction using autocorrelation function of those segments. Since the fois computed from the envelope of a single frequency component of the signal, the vocal tract resonances do not affect the foextraction. The use of the high SNR frequency component in a given segment helps in overcoming the effects of degradations in the speech signal, without explicitly estimating the characteristics of noise. The proposed method of foextraction is shown to give better performance for several types of real and simulated degradations, in comparison with some of the methods reported recently in the literature. Gunnam Aneeja, Bayya Yegnanarayana |
IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. | 1 |
| 2016 | Robust Estimation of Fundamental Frequency Using Single Frequency Filtering Approach
Vishala Pannala, Gunnam Aneeja, Sudarsana Reddy Kadiri, Bayya Yegnanarayana |
INTERSPEECH | 2 |
| 2015 | Single Frequency Filtering Approach for Discriminating Speech and NonspeechabstractIn this paper, a signal processing approach is proposed for speech/nonspeech discrimination. The approach is based on single frequency filtering (SFF), where the amplitude envelope of the signal is obtained at each frequency with high temporal and spectral resolution. This high resolution property helps to exploit the resulting high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) regions in time and frequency. The variance of the spectral information across frequency is higher for speech and lower for many types of noises. The mean and variance of the noise-compensated weighted envelopes are computed across frequency at each time instant. Decision logic is applied to the feature derived from the mean and variance values on varieties of degradations, including NTIMIT, CTIMIT and distance speech, besides degradation due to standard noise types. In all cases, the proposed method gives significantly better performance than the standard Adaptive Multi-rate VAD2 (AMR2) method. AMR2 method is chosen for comparison, as the method adapts itself for different degradations, and is seen to give good performance over different SNR situations. The proposed method does not use training data to derive the characteristics of speech or noise, nor makes any assumption on the nonspeech beginning. The SFF method appears promising in other applications of speech processing, such as pitch extraction and speech enhancement. Gunnam Aneeja, Bayya Yegnanarayana |
IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. | 1 |
| 2014 | Speech detection in transient noises
Gunnam Aneeja, Bayya Yegnanarayana |
INTERSPEECH | 1 |