Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rémi Lam

dblp:158/7662 · also Rémi R. Lam · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0003-4222-5358ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Optimization for machine learning · 100%
Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Algorithms and data structures · 55% Mathematical optimization · 45%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization
0.932018
Contour location via entropy reduction leveraging multiple information sources · NeurIPS 2018
Lookahead Bayesian Optimization with Inequality Constraints · NIPS 2017
Bayesian Optimization with a Finite Budget: An Approximate Dynamic Programming Approach · NIPS 2016
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
constrained bayesian optimization
0.312017
Lookahead Bayesian Optimization with Inequality Constraints · NIPS 2017
Algorithms and data structures › dynamic programming
approximate dynamic programming
0.212016
Bayesian Optimization with a Finite Budget: An Approximate Dynamic Programming Approach · NIPS 2016
Algorithms and data structures
dynamic programming
0.212016
Bayesian Optimization with a Finite Budget: An Approximate Dynamic Programming Approach · NIPS 2016
Mathematical optimization
constrained optimization
0.112017
Lookahead Bayesian Optimization with Inequality Constraints · NIPS 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

rollout · 1.1surrogate model · 0.7multi-fidelity · 0.7entropy reduction · 0.7predictive entropy search · 0.6lookahead · 0.6expected improvement · 0.6approximate dynamic programming · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Contour location via entropy reduction leveraging multiple information sources
abstract
We introduce an algorithm to locate contours of functions that are expensive to evaluate. The problem of locating contours arises in many applications, including classification, constrained optimization, and performance analysis of mechanical and dynamical systems (reliability, probability of failure, stability, etc.). Our algorithm locates contours using information from multiple sources, which are available in the form of relatively inexpensive, biased, and possibly noisy approximations to the original function. Considering multiple information sources can lead to significant cost savings. We also introduce the concept of contour entropy, a formal measure of uncertainty about the location of the zero contour of a function approximated by a statistical surrogate model. Our algorithm locates contours efficiently by maximizing the reduction of contour entropy per unit cost.
Alexandre Noll Marques, Rémi Lam, Karen Willcox
NeurIPS2
2017 Lookahead Bayesian Optimization with Inequality Constraints
abstract
We consider the task of optimizing an objective function subject to inequality constraints when both the objective and the constraints are expensive to evaluate. Bayesian optimization (BO) is a popular way to tackle optimization problems with expensive objective function evaluations, but has mostly been applied to unconstrained problems. Several BO approaches have been proposed to address expensive constraints but are limited to greedy strategies maximizing immediate reward. To address this limitation, we propose a lookahead approach that selects the next evaluation in order to maximize the long-term feasible reduction of the objective function. We present numerical experiments demonstrating the performance improvements of such a lookahead approach compared to several greedy BO algorithms, including constrained expected improvement (EIC) and predictive entropy search with constraint (PESC).
Rémi Lam, Karen Willcox
NIPS1
2016 Bayesian Optimization with a Finite Budget: An Approximate Dynamic Programming Approach
abstract
We consider the problem of optimizing an expensive objective function when a finite budget of total evaluations is prescribed. In that context, the optimal solution strategy for Bayesian optimization can be formulated as a dynamic programming instance. This results in a complex problem with uncountable, dimension-increasing state space and an uncountable control space. We show how to approximate the solution of this dynamic programming problem using rollout, and propose rollout heuristics specifically designed for the Bayesian optimization setting. We present numerical experiments showing that the resulting algorithm for optimization with a finite budget outperforms several popular Bayesian optimization algorithms.
Rémi Lam, Karen Willcox, David H. Wolpert
NIPS1