Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jacopo Buzzi

dblp:158/8179 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 91% Robot manipulation · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
feedback control
0.212015
Closed-Loop Control of Local Magnetic Actuation for Robotic Surgical Instruments · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2015
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
magnetic field control
0.212015
Closed-Loop Control of Local Magnetic Actuation for Robotic Surgical Instruments · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2015
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.212015
Closed-Loop Control of Local Magnetic Actuation for Robotic Surgical Instruments · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2015
Robotics › Robot manipulation › medical robotics
surgical robotics
0.112015
Closed-Loop Control of Local Magnetic Actuation for Robotic Surgical Instruments · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

magnetic gear theory · 0.2dynamic modeling · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Closed-Loop Control of Local Magnetic Actuation for Robotic Surgical Instruments
abstract
We propose local magnetic actuation (LMA) as an approach to robotic actuation for surgical instruments. An LMA actuation unit consists of a pair of diametrically magnetized single-dipole cylindrical magnets, working as magnetic gears across the abdominal wall. In this study, we developed a dynamic model for an LMA actuation unit by extending the theory proposed for coaxial magnetic gears. The dynamic model was used for closed-loop control, and two alternative strategies-using either the angular velocity at the motor or at the load as feedback parameter-were compared. The amount of mechanical power that can be transferred across the abdominal wall at different intermagnetic distances was also investigated. The proposed dynamic model presented a relative error below 7.5% in estimating the load torque from the system parameters. Both the strategies proposed for closed-loop control were effective in regulating the load speed with a relative error below 2% of the desired steady-state value. However, the load-side closed-loop control approach was more precise and allowed the system to transmit larger values of torque, showing, at the same time, less dependence from the angular velocity. In particular, an average value of 1.5 mN·m can be transferred at 7 cm, increasing up to 13.5 mN·m as the separation distance is reduced down to 2 cm. Given the constraints in diameter and volume for a surgical instrument, the proposed approach allows for transferring a larger amount of mechanical power than what would be possible to achieve by embedding commercial dc motors.
Christian Di Natali, Jacopo Buzzi, Nicolo Garbin, Marco Beccani, Pietro Valdastri
IEEE Trans. Robotics2