EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Piyush Madan
dblp:158/8571
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 60% Multi-agent systems · 20% Trustworthy machine learning · 20% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › safe reinforcement learning
constrained policy learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Teaching AI Agents Ethical Values Using Reinforcement Learning and Policy Orchestration · IJCAI 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
ethical AI |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Teaching AI Agents Ethical Values Using Reinforcement Learning and Policy Orchestration · IJCAI 2019 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
human-agent interaction |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Teaching AI Agents Ethical Values Using Reinforcement Learning and Policy Orchestration · IJCAI 2019 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning
inverse reinforcement learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Teaching AI Agents Ethical Values Using Reinforcement Learning and Policy Orchestration · IJCAI 2019 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
safe reinforcement learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Teaching AI Agents Ethical Values Using Reinforcement Learning and Policy Orchestration · IJCAI 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
policy orchestration · 0.4inverse reinforcement learning · 0.4contextual bandit · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Demystify challenges in adopting healthcare analytics solutions
Italo Buleje, Piyush Madan, Shilpa Mahatma |
AMIA | 3 |
| 2020 | Cloud-Native Language-Based Analysis for Neurodegenerative Assessment
Sundar Saranathan, Piyush Madan, Carla Agurto, Elif Eyigöz, Lauren Mitchell, Shilpa Mahatma, Guillermo A. Cecchi |
AMIA | 2 |
| 2019 | Teaching AI Agents Ethical Values Using Reinforcement Learning and Policy OrchestrationabstractAutonomous cyber-physical agents play an increasingly large role in our lives. To ensure that they behave in ways aligned with the values of society, we must develop techniques that allow these agents to not only maximize their reward in an environment, but also to learn and follow the implicit constraints of society. We detail a novel approach that uses inverse reinforcement learning to learn a set of unspecified constraints from demonstrations and reinforcement learning to learn to maximize environmental rewards. A contextual bandit-based orchestrator then picks between the two policies: constraint-based and environment reward-based. The contextual bandit orchestrator allows the agent to mix policies in novel ways, taking the best actions from either a reward-maximizing or constrained policy. In addition, the orchestrator is transparent on which policy is being employed at each time step. We test our algorithms using Pac-Man and show that the agent is able to learn to act optimally, act within the demonstrated constraints, and mix these two functions in complex ways. Ritesh Noothigattu, Djallel Bouneffouf 0001, Nicholas Mattei, Rachita Chandra, Piyush Madan, Kush R. Varshney, Murray Campbell, Moninder Singh, Francesca Rossi 0001 |
IJCAI | 5 |