Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shankha Subhra Chatterjee
dblp:158/8727 · also Shankha Chatterjee
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Storage systems · 57% Distributed systems · 43% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Storage systems
distributed storage |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Brief Announcement: A Probabilistic Performance Model and Tuning Framework for Eventually Consistent Distributed Storage Systems · PODC 2017 |
Distributed systems › replication
data replication |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | WatCA: The Waterloo consistency analyzer · ICDE 2016 |
Storage systems
key-value storage |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | WatCA: The Waterloo consistency analyzer · ICDE 2016 |
Distributed systems › consistency models
eventual consistency |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Brief Announcement: A Probabilistic Performance Model and Tuning Framework for Eventually Consistent Distributed Storage Systems · PODC 2017 |
Distributed systems › consistency models
tunable consistency |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | WatCA: The Waterloo consistency analyzer · ICDE 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
probabilistic modeling · 0.3adaptive tuning · 0.3real-time monitoring · 0.2interactive visualization · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Brief Announcement: A Probabilistic Performance Model and Tuning Framework for Eventually Consistent Distributed Storage SystemsabstractReplication protocols in distributed storage systems are fundamentally constrained by the finite propagation speed of information, which necessitates trade-offs among performance metrics even in the absence of failures. We make two contributions toward a clearer understanding of such trade-offs. First, we introduce a probabilistic model of eventual consistency that captures precisely the relationship between the workload, the network latency, and the consistency observed by clients. Second, we propose a technique for adaptive tuning of the consistency-latency trade-off that is based partly on measurement and partly on mathematical modeling. Experiments demonstrate that our probabilistic model predicts the behavior of a practical storage system accurately for low levels of throughput, and that our tuning framework provides superior convergence compared to a state-of-the-art solution. Shankha Subhra Chatterjee, Wojciech M. Golab |
PODC | 1 |
| 2017 | Self-tuning Eventually-Consistent Data Stores
Shankha Subhra Chatterjee, Wojciech M. Golab |
SSS | 1 |
| 2016 | WatCA: The Waterloo consistency analyzerabstractToday's online applications depend on fast storage and retrieval of up-to-date data at web scale. To meet this growing demand, the designers of distributed storage systems have devised a rich variety of data replication protocols, offering different trade-offs between consistency, latency, and availability. Understanding the sweet spot, and testing whether a system delivers a particular level of consistency, are challenging problems as consistency itself is difficult to reason about. This demo paper describes an interactive software tool for measuring and visualizing the consistency actually observed by client applications accessing a key-value storage system in real time. The tool can be used to evaluate performance trade-offs in a system with tunable consistency, or to verify the correctness of a storage system that guarantees certain forms of so-called “strong consistency”. Hua Fan 0002, Shankha Subhra Chatterjee, Wojciech M. Golab |
ICDE | 2 |