Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Austin Matthews

dblp:158/9293 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Language models and text generation · 60% Information extraction and text analysis · 24% Machine translation · 9%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › decoding
adaptive decoding
0.612022
Enabling Arbitrary Translation Objectives with Adaptive Tree Search · ICLR 2022
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
decoding
0.612022
Enabling Arbitrary Translation Objectives with Adaptive Tree Search · ICLR 2022
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation
0.612022
Enabling Arbitrary Translation Objectives with Adaptive Tree Search · ICLR 2022
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › lexical acquisition
vocabulary expansion
0.212016
Synthesizing Compound Words for Machine Translation · ACL (1) 2016
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network
0.212015
Transition-Based Dependency Parsing with Stack Long Short-Term Memory · ACL (1) 2015
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing
0.212015
Transition-Based Dependency Parsing with Stack Long Short-Term Memory · ACL (1) 2015
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing › dependency parsing
transition-based dependency parsing
0.212015
Transition-Based Dependency Parsing with Stack Long Short-Term Memory · ACL (1) 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

tree search · 0.6phrase-based translation · 0.2classification · 0.2transition-based parsing · 0.2Stack-LSTM · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Enabling Arbitrary Translation Objectives with Adaptive Tree Search
Wang Ling, Wojciech Stokowiec, Domenic Donato, Chris Dyer, Lei Yu 0008, Laurent Sartran, Austin Matthews
ICLR7
2019 Comparing Top-Down and Bottom-Up Neural Generative Dependency Models
abstract
Recurrent neural network grammars (RNNGs) generate sentences using phrase-structure syntax and perform very well in terms of both language modeling and parsing performance.However, since dependency annotations are much more readily available than phrase structure annotations, we propose two new generative models of projective dependency syntax, so as to explore whether generative dependency models are similarly effective.Both models use RNNs to represent the derivation history with making any explicit independence assumptions, but they differ in how they construct the trees: one builds the tree bottom up and the other top down, which profoundly changes the estimation problem faced by the learner.We evaluate the two models on three typologically different languages: English, Arabic, and Japanese.We find that both generative models improve parsing performance over a discriminative baseline, but, in contrast to RNNGs, they are significantly less effective than non-syntactic LSTM language models.Little difference between the tree construction orders is observed for either parsing or language modeling.
Austin Matthews, Graham Neubig, Chris Dyer
CoNLL1
2018 Using Morphological Knowledge in Open-Vocabulary Neural Language Models
abstract
Austin Matthews, Graham Neubig, Chris Dyer. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers). 2018.
Austin Matthews, Graham Neubig, Chris Dyer
NAACL-HLT1
2016 Synthesizing Compound Words for Machine Translation
abstract
Most machine translation systems construct translations from a closed vocabulary of target word forms, posing problems for translating into languages that have productive compounding processes.We present a simple and effective approach that deals with this problem in two phases.First, we build a classifier that identifies spans of the input text that can be translated into a single compound word in the target language.Then, for each identified span, we generate a pool of possible compounds which are added to the translation model as "synthetic" phrase translations.Experiments reveal that (i) we can effectively predict what spans can be compounded; (ii) our compound generation model produces good compounds; and (iii) modest improvements are possible in end-to-end English-German and English-Finnish translation tasks.We additionally introduce KomposEval, a new multi-reference dataset of English phrases and their translations into German compounds.
Austin Matthews, Eva Schlinger, Alon Lavie, Chris Dyer
ACL (1)1
2015 Transition-Based Dependency Parsing with Stack Long Short-Term Memory
abstract
Chris Dyer, Miguel Ballesteros, Wang Ling, Austin Matthews, Noah A. Smith. Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2015.
Chris Dyer, Miguel Ballesteros, Wang Ling, Austin Matthews, Noah A. Smith
ACL (1)4