Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jason Chen Zhao
dblp:159/0574
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers |
User interface design and tools · 44% Accessibility and assistive technology · 28% Collaborative and social computing · 22% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational finance and economics · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational finance and economics
financial decision-making |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | To Risk or Not to Risk?: Improving Financial Risk Taking of Older Adults by Online Social Information · CSCW 2015 |
Accessibility and assistive technology › older adults
assistive technology for older adults |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | CoFaçade: A Customizable Assistive Approach for Elders and Their Helpers · CHI 2015 |
User interface design and tools › customization
end-user customization |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | CoFaçade: A Customizable Assistive Approach for Elders and Their Helpers · CHI 2015 |
User interface design and tools › customization
interface customization |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | CoFaçade: A Customizable Assistive Approach for Elders and Their Helpers · CHI 2015 |
Health and well-being technologies
caregiving technology |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | CoFaçade: A Customizable Assistive Approach for Elders and Their Helpers · CHI 2015 |
Accessibility and assistive technology
older adults |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | To Risk or Not to Risk?: Improving Financial Risk Taking of Older Adults by Online Social Information · CSCW 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
online experiment · 0.4economic experiments · 0.2economic experiment · 0.2controlled experiment · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | CoFaçade: A Customizable Assistive Approach for Elders and Their HelpersabstractWe present CoFaçade, a novel approach to helping elders reach their goals with IT products by working collaboratively with helpers. In this approach, the elder uses an interface with a small number of triggers, where each trigger is a single button (or card) that can execute a procedure. The helper uses a customization interface to link triggers to procedures that accomplish frequently-recurring high-level goals with IT products. Customization can be done either locally or remotely. We conducted an experiment to compare the CoFaçade approach with a baseline approach where helpers taught elders to perform IT tasks. Our results showed that CoFaçade can reduce helpers' time and effort, reduce elders' frustration, and improve elders' success rate in completing IT tasks. Jason Chen Zhao, Richard C. Davis, Pin Sym Foong, Shengdong Zhao 0001 |
CHI | 1 |
| 2015 | To Risk or Not to Risk?: Improving Financial Risk Taking of Older Adults by Online Social InformationabstractIncreasing number of older adults manage their retirement savings online. A crucial element of better management is to take rational financial risk -- to strike a reasonable balance between expected gain and loss under uncertainty. With the emergence of Web 2.0 technologies, social trading networks can help individuals make better financial decisions by providing information about others' actions. It is, however, unclear whether these resources is beneficial to older adult's own financial decisions, especially because older adults are vulnerable to poor risk management. To address this question, we devise an experiment that improves upon an existing experimental economic task. We find that both peer information (detailed choices by a few individuals) and majority information (aggregated choices of the crowd) help older adults make more risk-neutral decisions. Furthermore, the combination of peer and majority information corrects more mistakes of more risk-averse older adults. Jason Chen Zhao, Wai-Tat Fu, Hanzhe Zhang, Shengdong Zhao 0001, Henry Been-Lirn Duh |
CSCW | 1 |