Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nathaniel Fruchter

dblp:159/0577 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2Security and privacy · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 87% Usability and user experience research · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing
computer-mediated communication
0.212015
Making Decisions From a Distance: The Impact of Technological Mediation on Riskiness and Dehumanization · CSCW 2015
Collaborative and social computing
technological mediation
0.212015
Making Decisions From a Distance: The Impact of Technological Mediation on Riskiness and Dehumanization · CSCW 2015
Usability and user experience research
decision-making
0.112015
Making Decisions From a Distance: The Impact of Technological Mediation on Riskiness and Dehumanization · CSCW 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

laboratory experiment · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Making Decisions From a Distance: The Impact of Technological Mediation on Riskiness and Dehumanization
abstract
Telepresence means business people can make deals in other countries, doctors can give remote medical advice, and soldiers can rescue someone from thousands of miles away. When interaction is mediated, people are removed from and lack context about the person they are making decisions about. In this paper, we explore the impact of technological mediation on risk and dehumanization in decision-making. We conducted a laboratory experiment involving medical treatment decisions. The results suggest that technological mediation influences decision making, but its influence depends on an individual's self-construal: participants who saw themselves as defined through their relationships (interdependent self-construal) recommended riskier and more painful treatments in video conferencing than when face-to-face. We discuss implications of our results for theory and future research.
Min Kyung Lee, Nathaniel Fruchter, Laura A. Dabbish
CSCW2
2015 "My Data Just Goes Everywhere: " User Mental Models of the Internet and Implications for Privacy and Security
Ruogu Kang, Laura A. Dabbish, Nathaniel Fruchter, Sara B. Kiesler
SOUPS3