Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Maren Mahsereci
dblp:159/1945
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 94% Deep learning architectures and training · 6% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › stochastic optimization
line search |
0.5 | 2 | 2017 | Probabilistic Line Searches for Stochastic Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 Probabilistic Line Searches for Stochastic Optimization · NIPS 2015 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization |
0.5 | 2 | 2017 | Probabilistic Line Searches for Stochastic Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 Probabilistic Line Searches for Stochastic Optimization · NIPS 2015 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
0.3 | 2 | 2017 | Probabilistic Line Searches for Stochastic Optimization · NIPS 2015 Probabilistic Line Searches for Stochastic Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
learning rate |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Probabilistic Line Searches for Stochastic Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Probabilistic Line Searches for Stochastic Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization › surrogate model
gaussian process surrogate |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Probabilistic Line Searches for Stochastic Optimization · NIPS 2015 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training optimization
learning rate tuning |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Probabilistic Line Searches for Stochastic Optimization · NIPS 2015 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Probabilistic Line Searches for Stochastic Optimization · NIPS 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
wolfe conditions · 0.5gaussian process · 0.5bayesian optimization · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Active Multi-Information Source Bayesian Quadrature
Alexandra Gessner, Maren Mahsereci |
UAI | 3 |
| 2017 | Probabilistic Line Searches for Stochastic OptimizationabstractIn deterministic optimization, line searches are a standard tool ensuring stability and efficiency. Where only stochastic gradients are available, no direct equivalent has so far been formulated, because uncertain gradients do not allow for a strict sequence of decisions collapsing the search space. We construct a probabilistic line search by combining the structure of existing deterministic methods with notions from Bayesian optimization. Our method retains a Gaussian process surrogate of the univariate optimization objective, and uses a probabilistic belief over the Wolfe conditions to monitor the descent. The algorithm has very low computational cost, and no user- controlled parameters. Experiments show that it effectively removes the need to define a learning rate for stochastic gradient descent. Maren Mahsereci, Philipp Hennig |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2015 | Probabilistic Line Searches for Stochastic OptimizationabstractIn deterministic optimization, line searches are a standard tool ensuring stability and efficiency. Where only stochastic gradients are available, no direct equivalent has so far been formulated, because uncertain gradients do not allow for a strict sequence of decisions collapsing the search space. We construct a probabilistic line search by combining the structure of existing deterministic methods with notions from Bayesian optimization. Our method retains a Gaussian process surrogate of the univariate optimization objective, and uses a probabilistic belief over the Wolfe conditions to monitor the descent. The algorithm has very low computational cost, and no user-controlled parameters. Experiments show that it effectively removes the need to define a learning rate for stochastic gradient descent. Maren Mahsereci, Philipp Hennig |
NIPS | 1 |