Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Maren Mahsereci

dblp:159/1945 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Optimization for machine learning · 94% Deep learning architectures and training · 6%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › stochastic optimization
line search
0.522017
Probabilistic Line Searches for Stochastic Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017
Probabilistic Line Searches for Stochastic Optimization · NIPS 2015
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization
0.522017
Probabilistic Line Searches for Stochastic Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017
Probabilistic Line Searches for Stochastic Optimization · NIPS 2015
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization
0.322017
Probabilistic Line Searches for Stochastic Optimization · NIPS 2015
Probabilistic Line Searches for Stochastic Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
learning rate
0.312017
Probabilistic Line Searches for Stochastic Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent
0.312017
Probabilistic Line Searches for Stochastic Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization › surrogate model
gaussian process surrogate
0.212015
Probabilistic Line Searches for Stochastic Optimization · NIPS 2015
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training optimization
learning rate tuning
0.112015
Probabilistic Line Searches for Stochastic Optimization · NIPS 2015
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training optimization
0.112015
Probabilistic Line Searches for Stochastic Optimization · NIPS 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

wolfe conditions · 0.5gaussian process · 0.5bayesian optimization · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Active Multi-Information Source Bayesian Quadrature
Alexandra Gessner, Maren Mahsereci
UAI3
2017 Probabilistic Line Searches for Stochastic Optimization
abstract
In deterministic optimization, line searches are a standard tool ensuring stability and efficiency. Where only stochastic gradients are available, no direct equivalent has so far been formulated, because uncertain gradients do not allow for a strict sequence of decisions collapsing the search space. We construct a probabilistic line search by combining the structure of existing deterministic methods with notions from Bayesian optimization. Our method retains a Gaussian process surrogate of the univariate optimization objective, and uses a probabilistic belief over the Wolfe conditions to monitor the descent. The algorithm has very low computational cost, and no user- controlled parameters. Experiments show that it effectively removes the need to define a learning rate for stochastic gradient descent.
Maren Mahsereci, Philipp Hennig
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2015 Probabilistic Line Searches for Stochastic Optimization
abstract
In deterministic optimization, line searches are a standard tool ensuring stability and efficiency. Where only stochastic gradients are available, no direct equivalent has so far been formulated, because uncertain gradients do not allow for a strict sequence of decisions collapsing the search space. We construct a probabilistic line search by combining the structure of existing deterministic methods with notions from Bayesian optimization. Our method retains a Gaussian process surrogate of the univariate optimization objective, and uses a probabilistic belief over the Wolfe conditions to monitor the descent. The algorithm has very low computational cost, and no user-controlled parameters. Experiments show that it effectively removes the need to define a learning rate for stochastic gradient descent.
Maren Mahsereci, Philipp Hennig
NIPS1