Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Youngdong Kim
dblp:159/6173
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 78% Deep learning architectures and training · 15% Learning paradigms · 6% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
machine unlearning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Forget What Matters, Keep the Rest: Selective Unlearning of Informative Tokens · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
learning with noisy labels |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | Joint Negative and Positive Learning for Noisy Labels · CVPR 2021 NLNL: Negative Learning for Noisy Labels · ICCV 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › adversarial machine learning
adversarial data augmentation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | BiasAdv: Bias-Adversarial Augmentation for Model Debiasing · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | BiasAdv: Bias-Adversarial Augmentation for Model Debiasing · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | BiasAdv: Bias-Adversarial Augmentation for Model Debiasing · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › bias mitigation
model debiasing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | BiasAdv: Bias-Adversarial Augmentation for Model Debiasing · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | BiasAdv: Bias-Adversarial Augmentation for Model Debiasing · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
spurious correlation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | BiasAdv: Bias-Adversarial Augmentation for Model Debiasing · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › weakly supervised learning
complementary label learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Joint Negative and Positive Learning for Noisy Labels · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
loss function design |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Joint Negative and Positive Learning for Noisy Labels · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › learning with noisy labels
noisy label classification |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Joint Negative and Positive Learning for Noisy Labels · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › learning with noisy labels
robustness to label noise |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | NLNL: Negative Learning for Noisy Labels · ICCV 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
entropy of predictive distribution · 1.0semi-supervised learning · 0.9negative learning · 0.9optimization · 0.7adversarial attack · 0.7positive learning · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Forget What Matters, Keep the Rest: Selective Unlearning of Informative TokensabstractUnlearning in large language models (LLMs) has emerged as a promising safeguard against adversarial behaviors.When the forgetting loss is applied uniformly without considering tokenlevel semantic importance, model utility can be unnecessarily degraded.Recent studies have explored token-wise loss regularizers that prioritize informative tokens, but largely rely on ground-truth confidence or external linguistic parsers, which limits their ability to capture contextual information or the model's overall predictive state.Intuitively, function words like "the" primarily serve syntactic roles and are highly predictable with little ambiguity, but informative words admit multiple plausible alternatives with greater uncertainty.Based on this intuition, we propose Entropy-guided Token Weighting (ETW), a token-level unlearning regularizer that uses entropy of the predictive distribution as a proxy for token informativeness.We demonstrate that informative tokens tend to have higher entropy, whereas structural tokens tend to have lower entropy.This behavior enables ETW to achieve more effective unlearning while better preserving model utility than existing token-level approaches.Q. Seunghee Koh, Sunghyun Baek, Youngdong Kim, Junmo Kim 0002 |
ACL (1) | 3 |
| 2023 | BiasAdv: Bias-Adversarial Augmentation for Model DebiasingabstractNeural networks are often prone to bias toward spurious correlations inherent in a dataset, thus failing to generalize unbiased test criteria. A key challenge to resolving the issue is the significant lack of bias-conflicting training data (i. e., samples without spurious correlations). In this paper, we propose a novel data augmentation approach termed Bias-Adversarial augmentation (BiasAdv) that supplements bias-conflicting samples with adversarial images. Our key idea is that an adversarial attack on a biased model that makes decisions based on spurious correlations may generate syn-thetic bias-conflicting samples, which can then be used as augmented training data for learning a debiased model. Specifically, we formulate an optimization problem for gen-erating adversarial images that attack the predictions of an auxiliary biased model without ruining the predictions of the desired debiased model. Despite its simplicity, we find that BiasAdv can generate surprisingly useful synthetic bias-conflicting samples, allowing the debiased model to learn generalizable representations. Furthermore, BiasAdv does not require any bias annotations or prior knowledge of the bias type, which enables its broad applicability to existing debiasing methods to improve their performances. Our extensive experimental results demonstrate the superiority of BiasAdv, achieving state-of-the-art performance on four popular benchmark datasets across various bias domains. Jongin Lim 0002, Youngdong Kim, Byungjai Kim, Chanho Ahn, Jinwoo Shin, Eunho Yang, Seungju Han 0001 |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2021 | Joint Negative and Positive Learning for Noisy LabelsabstractTraining of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) with data with noisy labels is known to be a challenge. Based on the fact that directly providing the label to the data (Positive Learning; PL) has a risk of allowing CNNs to memorize the contaminated labels for the case of noisy data, the indirect learning approach that uses complementary labels (Negative Learning for Noisy Labels; NLNL) has proven to be highly effective in preventing overfitting to noisy data as it reduces the risk of providing faulty target. NLNL further employs a three-stage pipeline to improve convergence. As a result, filtering noisy data through the NLNL pipeline is cumbersome, increasing the training cost. In this study, we propose a novel improvement of NLNL, named Joint Negative and Positive Learning (JNPL), that unifies the filtering pipeline into a single stage. JNPL trains CNN via two losses, NL+ and PL+, which are improved upon NL and PL loss functions, respectively. We analyze the fundamental issue of NL loss function and develop new NL+ loss function producing gradient that enhances the convergence of noisy data. Furthermore, PL+ loss function is designed to enable faster convergence to expected-to-be-clean data. We show that the NL+ and PL+ train CNN simultaneously, significantly simplifying the pipeline, allowing greater ease of practical use compared to NLNL. With a simple semi-supervised training technique, our method achieves state-of-the-art accuracy for noisy data classification based on the superior filtering ability. Youngdong Kim, Juseung Yun, Hyounguk Shon, Junmo Kim 0002 |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2019 | NLNL: Negative Learning for Noisy LabelsabstractConvolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) provide excellent performance when used for image classification. The classical method of training CNNs is by labeling images in a supervised manner as in "input image belongs to this label'' (Positive Learning; PL), which is a fast and accurate method if the labels are assigned correctly to all images. However, if inaccurate labels, or noisy labels, exist, training with PL will provide wrong information, thus severely degrading performance. To address this issue, we start with an indirect learning method called Negative Learning (NL), in which the CNNs are trained using a complementary label as in "input image does not belong to this complementary label.'' Because the chances of selecting a true label as a complementary label are low, NL decreases the risk of providing incorrect information. Furthermore, to improve convergence, we extend our method by adopting PL selectively, termed as Selective Negative Learning and Positive Learning (SelNLPL). PL is used selectively to train upon expected-to-be-clean data, whose choices become possible as NL progresses, thus resulting in superior performance of filtering out noisy data. With simple semi-supervised training technique, our method achieves state-of-the-art accuracy for noisy data classification, proving the superiority of SelNLPL's noisy data filtering ability. Youngdong Kim, Junho Yim, Juseung Yun, Junmo Kim 0002 |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2017 | Refine pedestrian detections by referring to features in different waysabstractThe performance of object detection has been improved as the success of deep architectures. The main algorithm predominantly used for general detection is Faster R-CNN because of their high accuracy and fast inference time. In pedestrian detection, Region Proposal Network (RPN) itself which is used for region proposals in Faster R-CNN can be used as a pedestrian detector. Also, RPN even shows better performance than Faster R-CNN for pedestrian detection. However, RPN generates severe false positives such as high score backgrounds and double detections because it does not have downstream classifier. From this observations, we made a network to refine results generated from the RPN. Our Refinement Network refers to the feature maps of the RPN and trains the network to rescore severe false positives. Also, we found that different type of feature referencing method is crucial for improving performance. Our network showed better accuracy than RPN with almost same speed on Caltech Pedestrian Detection benchmark. Jaemyung Lee 0003, Sihaeng Lee, Youngdong Kim, Janghyeon Lee 0001, Junmo Kim 0002 |
Intelligent Vehicles Symposium | 3 |