Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pit Pietsch

dblp:16/10607 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Requirements engineering and software design · 80% Software testing · 20%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design
model-driven engineering
0.322012
Adaptability of model comparison tools · ASE 2012
Generating realistic test models for model processing tools · ASE 2011
Requirements engineering and software design › model-driven engineering › model management
model comparison
0.112012
Adaptability of model comparison tools · ASE 2012
Requirements engineering and software design › model-driven engineering
model generation
0.112011
Generating realistic test models for model processing tools · ASE 2011
Requirements engineering and software design
software architecture
0.112011
Generating realistic test models for model processing tools · ASE 2011
Software testing
test generation
0.012011
Generating realistic test models for model processing tools · ASE 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

specification language · 0.1incremental matching · 0.1statistical model generation · 0.1graph operations · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Shape-based Object Retrieval and Classification with Supervised Optimisation
Oliver Tiebe, Pit Pietsch, Christian Feinen, Udo Kelter, Marcin Grzegorzek
ICPRAM (1)3
2014 Shape-based object retrieval by contour segment matching
abstract
In this paper we introduce an approach for object retrieval that uses contour segment matching for shape similarity computation. The object contour is partitioned into segments by skeleton endpoints. Each contour segment is represented by a rotation and scale invariant, 12-dimensional feature vector. The similarity of two objects is determined by matching their contour segments using the Hungarian algorithm. Our method is insensitive to object deformation and outperforms existing shape-based object retrieval algorithms. The most significant scientific contributions of this paper include (i) the introduction of a new feature extraction technique for contour segments as well as (ii) a new similarity measure for contour segments cleverly modelling the human perception and easily adapting to concrete application domains, and (iii) the impressive robustness of the method in an object retrieval scenario.
Oliver Tiebe, Pit Pietsch, Christian Feinen, Udo Kelter, Marcin Grzegorzek
ICIP3
2012 Adaptability of model comparison tools
abstract
Modern model-based development methodologies require a large number of efficient, high-quality model comparison tools. They must be carefully adapted to the specific model type, user preferences and application context. Implementing a large number of dedicated, monolithic tools is infeasible, the only viable approach are generic, adaptable tools. Generic tools currently available provide only partial or low-quality solutions to this challenge; their results are not satisfactory for model types such as state machines or block diagrams. This paper presents the SiDiff approach to model comparison which includes a set of highly configurable incremental matchers and a specification language to control their application.
Timo Kehrer, Udo Kelter, Pit Pietsch, Maik Schmidt
ASE3
2011 Generating realistic test models for model processing tools
abstract
Test models are needed to evaluate and benchmark algorithms and tools in model driven development. Most model generators randomly apply graph operations on graph representations of models. This approach leads to test models of poor quality. Some approaches do not guarantee the basic syntactic correctness of the created models. Even if so, it is almost impossible to guarantee, or even control, the creation of complex structures, e.g. a subgraph which implements an association between two classes. Such a subgraph consists of an association node, two association end nodes, and several edges, and is normally created by one user command. This paper presents the SiDiff Model Generator, which can generate models, or sets of models, which are syntactically correct, contain complex structures, and exhibit defined statistical characteristics.
Pit Pietsch, Hamed Shariat Yazdi, Udo Kelter
ASE1