Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pedro Bergés

dblp:16/1374 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Legged, aerial and field robots · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Computer animation and physical simulation · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › legged robots › legged robot locomotion
impact force analysis
0.122006
Compliance Requirements for Non-rebounding Impact in Legged Locomotion · ICRA 2006
Impact Forces in Legged Robot Locomotion · ICRA 2005
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › legged robots
legged robot locomotion
0.122006
Compliance Requirements for Non-rebounding Impact in Legged Locomotion · ICRA 2006
Impact Forces in Legged Robot Locomotion · ICRA 2005
Computer animation and physical simulation
contact simulation
0.022006
Compliance Requirements for Non-rebounding Impact in Legged Locomotion · ICRA 2006
Impact Forces in Legged Robot Locomotion · ICRA 2005
Computer animation and physical simulation › contact simulation
impact dynamics
0.012005
Impact Forces in Legged Robot Locomotion · ICRA 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

energetic coefficient of restitution · 0.2work-energy framework · 0.1coulomb friction · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Compliance Requirements for Non-rebounding Impact in Legged Locomotion
abstract
An energetic approach for analysis of the impact problem in three dimensional multi-legged robot locomotion is hereby presented. The goal is to combine rigid and deformable body approaches which come together naturally in a work-energy framework. The proposed hybrid approach can predict both rebound and non-rebound for an energetic coefficient of restitution greater than zero. Zero tangential velocity in the impacting end effectors can be also predicted, a condition known as sticking. The paper presents a method for determining whether the level of compliance in the system at a given configuration is adequate to insure a no-slip, no-rebound impact
Pedro Bergés, Alan P. Bowling
ICRA1
2005 Impact Forces in Legged Robot Locomotion
abstract
An energetic approach to the impact problem in planar legged robot locomotion is hereby presented. The goal is to find the configurations that yield zero tangential velocity at the impacting leg, a condition known as sticking, and restitute the least energy back into the system. With this analysis, the ground contact friction and the inertial properties of the system, including those of the servo motors, play a determinant role in the impact analysis. This approach yields an energetic criterion for the analysis of the transition from impact to contact constraint conditions. This paper presents a simple, robust method that uses the system generalized coordinates and velocities, the Jacobian, the mass matrix, the coulomb friction law, and the energetic coefficient of restitution to determine whether or not the current configuration is advantageous for maintaining contact, and thereby controllability, in the presence of impulsive forces.
Pedro Bergés, Alan P. Bowling
ICRA1