Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
William L. Kuechler Jr.
dblp:16/159
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Requirements engineering and software design · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Database system architecture and tuning · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › representation language › knowledge representation formalisms
declarative representation |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | A Data/Knowledge Paradigm for the Modeling and Design of Operations Support Systems · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 1997 |
Requirements engineering and software design
software architecture |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | A Data/Knowledge Paradigm for the Modeling and Design of Operations Support Systems · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 1997 |
Database system architecture and tuning
active database |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | A Data/Knowledge Paradigm for the Modeling and Design of Operations Support Systems · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 1997 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
object-oriented design · 0.1frame-based systems · 0.1active inferencing · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | On theory development in design science research: anatomy of a research projectabstractThe common understanding of design science research in information systems (DSRIS) continues to evolve. Only in the broadest terms has there been consensus: that DSRIS involves, in some way, learning through the act of building. However, what is to be built – the definition of the DSRIS artifact – and how it is to be built – the methodology of DSRIS – has drawn increasing discussion in recent years. The relationship of DSRIS to theory continues to make up a significant part of the discussion: how theory should inform DSRIS and whether or not DSRIS can or should be instrumental in developing and refining theory. In this paper, we present the exegesis of a DSRIS research project in which creating a (prescriptive) design theory through the process of developing and testing an information systems artifact is inextricably bound to the testing and refinement of its kernel theory. William L. Kuechler Jr., Vijay K. Vaishnavi |
Eur. J. Inf. Syst. | 1 |
| 2008 | An expert system for dynamic re-coordination of distributed workflows
William L. Kuechler Jr., Vijay K. Vaishnavi |
Expert Syst. Appl. | 1 |
| 2001 | Supporting optimization of business-to-business e-commerce relationships
William L. Kuechler Jr., Vijay K. Vaishnavi, David Kuechler |
Decis. Support Syst. | 1 |
| 1997 | A Data/Knowledge Paradigm for the Modeling and Design of Operations Support SystemsabstractThe paper develops the Smart Object paradigm and its instantiation, which provide a new conceptualization for the modeling, design, and development of an important but little researched class of information systems, operations support systems (OSS). OSS is the authors' term for systems which provide interactive support for the management of large, complex operations environments, such as manufacturing plants, military operations, and large power generation facilities. The most salient feature of an OSS is its dynamic nature. The number and kind of elements composing the system as well as the mode of control of those elements change frequently in response to the environment. The abstraction of control and the ease with which complex dynamic control behavior can be modeled and simulated is one of the important aspects of the paradigm. The framework for the Smart Object paradigm is the fusion of object-oriented design models with declarative knowledge representation and active inferencing from AI models. Additional defining concepts from data/knowledge models, semantic data models, active databases, and frame based systems, are added to the synthesis as justified by their contribution to the ability to naturally model OSS at a high level of abstraction. The model assists in declaratively representing domain data/knowledge and its structure, and task or process knowledge, in addition to modeling multilevel control and interobject coordination. Vijay K. Vaishnavi, Gary C. Buchanan, William L. Kuechler Jr. |
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. | 3 |