Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Weng-Ling Peng
dblp:16/1610
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1987
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection › statistical database privacy
inference control |
0.0 | 1 | 1987 | An Evaluation of Two New Inference Control Methods · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1987 |
Privacy and data protection
statistical database privacy |
0.0 | 1 | 1987 | An Evaluation of Two New Inference Control Methods · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1987 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 0.0restriction · 0.0perturbation · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1987 | An Evaluation of Two New Inference Control MethodsabstractAn evaluation method is developed to measure the cost/ effectiveness of two new inference control methods. The factors of the evaluation function consist of: 1) preparation cost for the control method, 2) query complexity, and 3) security level under various attacks. Each control method combines the merit of some popular concepts; the first method is based on restriction, and the second on perturbation. Simulation results indicate that both methods have higher preparation cost, better security, and faster response time than Cox's method and Beck's method. Finally these two new methods are compared to each other. Weng-Ling Peng |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 2 |