Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Arne Sieber

dblp:16/2703 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Robot manipulation · 52% Motion planning and robot control · 48%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation › micromanipulation
microgripper
0.112007
Polymer sensorised microgrippers using SMA actuation · ICRA 2007
Robotics › Robot manipulation
micromanipulation
0.112007
Polymer sensorised microgrippers using SMA actuation · ICRA 2007
Robotics › Robot manipulation
soft robotics
0.112007
Polymer sensorised microgrippers using SMA actuation · ICRA 2007
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
teleoperation
0.112007
Control of a Teleoperated Nanomanipulator with Time Delay under Direct Vision Feedback · ICRA 2007
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › teleoperation
time-delay teleoperation
0.112007
Control of a Teleoperated Nanomanipulator with Time Delay under Direct Vision Feedback · ICRA 2007
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › teleoperation
vision-based teleoperation
0.112007
Control of a Teleoperated Nanomanipulator with Time Delay under Direct Vision Feedback · ICRA 2007
Robotics › Robot manipulation › micro/nano manipulation
nanomanipulation
0.012007
Control of a Teleoperated Nanomanipulator with Time Delay under Direct Vision Feedback · ICRA 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

variable-step control · 0.1strain gauge sensing · 0.1shape memory alloy actuation · 0.1shape deposition manufacturing · 0.1fixed-step control · 0.1fitts' law · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2007 Polymer sensorised microgrippers using SMA actuation
abstract
In this paper a polymer sensorised microgripping tool for micromanipulation is presented. The gripper structure is made by moulding of polyurethane in silicon moulds by the technique of shape deposition manufacturing (SDM), in which the force sensing elements and part of the actuator (in this case, microstrain gauges and SMA (shape memory alloy) wire, respectively) are embedded into the microgripper in one process step. The actuation principle for the microgripper is an SMA wire. The advantages of the fabrication process are low cost and manufacture cycle time. This paper details the technique for fabrication of the microgripper to produce prototypes. These prototypes were then tested and characterised in terms of force output, hysteresis and repeatability. A further miniaturised unsensorised microgripper based on the same actuation principle and fabrication process (but less than half the size) was fabricated to demonstrate the possibility of further downscaling.
Keith Houston, Clemens Eder, Arne Sieber, Arianna Menciassi, Maria Chiara Carrozza, Paolo Dario
ICRA3
2007 Control of a Teleoperated Nanomanipulator with Time Delay under Direct Vision Feedback
abstract
Remote manipulation tasks in the small scale can often not be performed autonomously, due to the unstructured nature of the environments and the limited capabilities of sensor and localization technologies. For these tasks, teleoperated systems are used, in which the human operator is integral part of the control. In time-delayed teleoperation, the operator gradually adopts discrete control strategies, such as 'move-and-wait'. In this paper, we present and compare three different control strategies for driving a nanomanipulation system with direct vision feedback. Two strategies are based on a fixed step size to move the manipulator, while the third uses a variable step size. The strategies are compared on a 2D fine positioning task. Experimental results are in agreement with Fitts' law and show that the third strategy, besides allowing movements of size ranging across several orders of magnitude, also allows to complete the fine positioning task in less time. The control strategies can be used in general to control vision-guided teleoperation systems affected by time delay.
Oliver Tonet, Martina Marinelli, Giuseppe Megali, Arne Sieber, Pietro Valdastri, Arianna Menciassi, Paolo Dario
ICRA4