Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kevin D. Cummings

dblp:16/3325 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1990
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › physical design
lithography
0.011990
Proximity Effect Corrections in Electron Beam Lithography · NIPS 1990
Electronic design automation › physical design › lithography
electron beam lithography
0.011990
Proximity Effect Corrections in Electron Beam Lithography · NIPS 1990
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1990 Computation of proximity effect corrections in electron beam lithography by a neural network
abstract
The proximity effect, caused by electron-beam backscattering during resist exposure, can be compensated for by appropriate local changes in the incident beam dose, but the optimal correction, found iteratively, requires a prohibitively long time for realistic pattern sizes. A neural network has been used to perform these corrections, resulting in a significant decrease in computation time. The correction was first computed for a small test pattern using an iterative method. This solution was used as a training set for an adaptive, feedforward neural network, using back-propagation learning. After training, the network computed the same correction as the iterative method, but in a much shorter time
Robert C. Frye, Edward A. Rietman, Kevin D. Cummings
IJCNN3
1990 Proximity Effect Corrections in Electron Beam Lithography
Robert C. Frye, Kevin D. Cummings, Edward A. Rietman
NIPS2