Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jerry J. Cupal
dblp:16/3581
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1990
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Integrated circuit design · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Integrated circuit design › digital circuit design
arithmetic circuit design |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Redundant Logarithmic Arithmetic · IEEE Trans. Computers 1990 |
Integrated circuit design › digital circuit design › arithmetic circuit design
logarithmic number system |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Redundant Logarithmic Arithmetic · IEEE Trans. Computers 1990 |
Integrated circuit design
redundant number representation |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Redundant Logarithmic Arithmetic · IEEE Trans. Computers 1990 |
Integrated circuit design › digital arithmetic circuits
online arithmetic |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Redundant Logarithmic Arithmetic · IEEE Trans. Computers 1990 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
table lookup · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990 | Redundant Logarithmic ArithmeticabstractA number system that offers advantages in some situations over conventional floating point and sign/logarithmic number systems is described. Redundant logarithmic arithmetic, like conventional logarithmic arithmetic, relies on table lookups to make the arithmetic unit simpler than an equivalent floating point unit. The cost of 32 bit subtraction in a redundant logarithmic number system is lower than previously published logarithmic subtraction methods. The total memory requirement for a 29-bit redundant logarithmic unit is 16 K words compared to 22 K words by the best previously published conventional sign logarithm unit, assuming similar addition techniques are employed. A redundant logarithmic number system can be implemented with online arithmetic, which would be impractical for a conventional sign logarithm number system. The disadvantages of redundant arithmetic are typical of redundant number systems. First, the redundancy doubles the storage requirements for data values. Second, the representation can become ill-conditioned, especially as a result of iterated multiplications. Third, division and square root operations are more difficult to implement in redundant logarithmic arithmetic.> Mark G. Arnold, Thomas A. Bailey, John R. Cowles, Jerry J. Cupal |
IEEE Trans. Computers | 4 |
| 1989 | Redundant logarithmic number systemsabstractA new number system that offers advantages over conventional floating-point and sign/logarithm number systems is described. Called redundant logarithmic arithmetic, it relies, like conventional logarithmic arithmetic, on table lookups to make the arithmetic unit simpler than an equivalent floating-point unit. The cost of 32-b subtraction in a redundant logarithmic number system is lower than that of previously published logarithmic subtraction methods. Another advantage of a redundant logarithmic number system is that a single arithmetic unit can use the same hardware to add, subtract, or multiply in similar times.> Mark G. Arnold, Thomas A. Bailey, John R. Cowles, Jerry J. Cupal |
IEEE Symposium on Computer Arithmetic | 4 |