Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kim Whittlesey

dblp:16/3653 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 4Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
4 papers
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 46% Computational geometry · 31% Approximation and online algorithms · 22%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Graph algorithms and graph theory
topological graph theory
0.222013
Transforming Curves on Surfaces Redux · SODA 2013
Greedy optimal homotopy and homology generators · SODA 2005
Graph algorithms and graph theory › topological graph theory
surface-embedded graphs
0.212013
Transforming Curves on Surfaces Redux · SODA 2013
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms
0.112006
Minimum-cost coverage of point sets by disks · SCG 2006
Computational geometry › geometric covering
disk covering
0.112006
Minimum-cost coverage of point sets by disks · SCG 2006
Approximation and online algorithms
facility location
0.112006
Minimum-cost coverage of point sets by disks · SCG 2006
Computational geometry
geometric covering
0.112006
Minimum-cost coverage of point sets by disks · SCG 2006
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation schemes
polynomial-time approximation scheme
0.112006
Minimum-cost coverage of point sets by disks · SCG 2006
Computational geometry › computational topology
homology generators
0.112005
Greedy optimal homotopy and homology generators · SODA 2005
Computational geometry
topological algorithms
0.012006
Splitting (complicated) surfaces is hard · SCG 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

small cancellation theory · 0.2run-length encoding · 0.2approximation algorithm · 0.1NP-hardness reduction · 0.1greedy algorithm · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Transforming Curves on Surfaces Redux
abstract
Almost exactly 100 years ago, Max Dehn described the first combinatorial algorithm to determine whether two given cycles on a compact surface are homotopic, meaning one cycle can be continuously deformed into the other without leaving the surface. We describe a simple variant of Dehn's algorithm that runs in linear time, with no hidden dependence on the genus of the surface. Specifically, given two closed vertex-edge walks of length at most ℓ in a combinatorial surface of complexity n, our algorithm determines whether the walks are homotopic in O(n + ℓ) time. Our algorithm simplifies and corrects a similar algorithm of Dey and Guha [JCSS 1999] and simplifies the more recent algorithm of Lazarus and Rivaud [FOCS 2012], who identified a subtle flaw in Dey and Guha's results. Our algorithm combines components of these earlier algorithms, classical results in small cancellation theory by Gersten and Short [Inventions 1990], and simple run-length encoding.
Jeff Erickson 0001, Kim Whittlesey
SODA2
2008 Splitting (complicated) surfaces is hard
Erin W. Chambers, Éric Colin de Verdière, Jeff Erickson 0001, Francis Lazarus, Kim Whittlesey
Comput. Geom.5
2006 Minimum-cost coverage of point sets by disks
abstract
We consider a class of geometric facility location problems in which the goal is to determine a set X of disks given by their centers (tj) and radii (rj) that cover a given set of demand points Y∈R2 at the smallest possible cost. We consider cost functions of the form Εjf(rj), where f(r)=rα is the cost of transmission to radius r. Special cases arise for α=1 (sum of radii) and α=2 (total area); power consumption models in wireless network design often use an exponent α>2. Different scenarios arise according to possible restrictions on the transmission centers tj, which may be constrained to belong to a given discrete set or to lie on a line, etc.We obtain several new results, including (a) exact and approximation algorithms for selecting transmission points tj on a given line in order to cover demand points Y∈R2; (b) approximation algorithms (and an algebraic intractability result) for selecting an optimal line on which to place transmission points to cover Y; (c) a proof of NP-hardness for a discrete set of transmission points in R2 and any fixed α>1; and (d) a polynomial-time approximation scheme for the problem of computing a minimum cost covering tour (MCCT), in which the total cost is a linear combination of the transmission cost for the set of disks and the length of a tour/path that connects the centers of the disks.
Helmut Alt, Esther M. Arkin, Hervé Brönnimann, Jeff Erickson 0001, Sándor P. Fekete, Christian Knauer, Jonathan Lenchner, Joseph S. B. Mitchell, Kim Whittlesey
SCG9
2006 Splitting (complicated) surfaces is hard
abstract
All in-text\treferences\tunderlined\tin\tblue\tare\tlinked\tto\tpublications\ton\tResearchGate, letting you\taccess\tand\tread\tthem\timmediately.
Erin W. Chambers, Éric Colin de Verdière, Jeff Erickson 0001, Francis Lazarus, Kim Whittlesey
SCG5
2005 Greedy optimal homotopy and homology generators
Jeff Erickson 0001, Kim Whittlesey
SODA2