Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ingo Stürmer
dblp:16/3868
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Software testing · 89% Program synthesis and code generation · 11% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software testing › compiler testing
code generator testing |
0.1 | 2 | 2007 | Systematic Testing of Model-Based Code Generators · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2007 Test Suite Design for Code Generation Tools · ASE 2003 |
Software testing
compiler testing |
0.1 | 2 | 2007 | Systematic Testing of Model-Based Code Generators · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2007 Test Suite Design for Code Generation Tools · ASE 2003 |
Software testing
model-based testing |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Systematic Testing of Model-Based Code Generators · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2007 |
Software testing › test process › test design
test suite design |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Test Suite Design for Code Generation Tools · ASE 2003 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
model-based development · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | Reviewing Software Models in Compliance with ISO 26262
Ingo Stürmer, Elke Salecker, Hartmut Pohlheim |
SAFECOMP | 1 |
| 2007 | Systematic Testing of Model-Based Code GeneratorsabstractUnlike for conventional compilers for imperative programming languages such as C or ADA, no established methods for safeguarding artifacts generated by model-based code generators exist despite progress in the field of formal verification. Several test approaches dominate the engineering practice. This paper describes a general and tool-independent test architecture for code generators used in model-based development. We evaluate the effectiveness of our test approach by means of testing optimizations performed by the TargetLink code generator, a widely accepted and complex development tool used in automotive model-based development. Ingo Stürmer, Mirko Conrad, Heiko Dörr, Peter Pepper |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 1 |
| 2004 | Generating Test Cases for Code Generators by Unfolding Graph Transformation Systems
Paolo Baldan, Barbara König 0001, Ingo Stürmer |
ICGT | 3 |
| 2003 | Test Suite Design for Code Generation ToolsabstractIn model-based development, executable specifications (models) are used for the design of the software to be developed. New techniques allow the automatic generation of compact code directly from the model via so-called code generators. However, at present, code generators do not possess the same quality characteristics as C or ADA compilers which have been proven in use. The use of test suites, which make it possible to check compilers systematically, is also a promising approach for code generators. This paper describes the design of such a test suite for code generators, and introduces a new testing approach for code generator transformations. Ingo Stürmer, Mirko Conrad |
ASE | 1 |