Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ingo Stürmer

dblp:16/3868 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Software testing · 89% Program synthesis and code generation · 11%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing › compiler testing
code generator testing
0.122007
Systematic Testing of Model-Based Code Generators · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2007
Test Suite Design for Code Generation Tools · ASE 2003
Software testing
compiler testing
0.122007
Systematic Testing of Model-Based Code Generators · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2007
Test Suite Design for Code Generation Tools · ASE 2003
Software testing
model-based testing
0.112007
Systematic Testing of Model-Based Code Generators · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2007
Software testing › test process › test design
test suite design
0.012003
Test Suite Design for Code Generation Tools · ASE 2003

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

model-based development · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Reviewing Software Models in Compliance with ISO 26262
Ingo Stürmer, Elke Salecker, Hartmut Pohlheim
SAFECOMP1
2007 Systematic Testing of Model-Based Code Generators
abstract
Unlike for conventional compilers for imperative programming languages such as C or ADA, no established methods for safeguarding artifacts generated by model-based code generators exist despite progress in the field of formal verification. Several test approaches dominate the engineering practice. This paper describes a general and tool-independent test architecture for code generators used in model-based development. We evaluate the effectiveness of our test approach by means of testing optimizations performed by the TargetLink code generator, a widely accepted and complex development tool used in automotive model-based development.
Ingo Stürmer, Mirko Conrad, Heiko Dörr, Peter Pepper
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.1
2004 Generating Test Cases for Code Generators by Unfolding Graph Transformation Systems
Paolo Baldan, Barbara König 0001, Ingo Stürmer
ICGT3
2003 Test Suite Design for Code Generation Tools
abstract
In model-based development, executable specifications (models) are used for the design of the software to be developed. New techniques allow the automatic generation of compact code directly from the model via so-called code generators. However, at present, code generators do not possess the same quality characteristics as C or ADA compilers which have been proven in use. The use of test suites, which make it possible to check compilers systematically, is also a promising approach for code generators. This paper describes the design of such a test suite for code generators, and introduces a new testing approach for code generator transformations.
Ingo Stürmer, Mirko Conrad
ASE1