Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Simon E. B. Thierry
dblp:16/4020
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
0000-0002-9267-746XORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Geometric modeling and processing · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Geometric modeling and processing
geometric constraint solving |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Extensions of the witness method to characterize under-, over- and well-constrained geometric constraint systems · Comput. Aided Des. 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
witness method · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | Extensions of the witness method to characterize under-, over- and well-constrained geometric constraint systems
Simon E. B. Thierry, Pascal Schreck, Dominique Michelucci, Christoph Fünfzig, Jean-David Génevaux |
Comput. Aided Des. | 1 |
| 2010 | Using the witness method to detect rigid subsystems of geometric constraints in CADabstractInternational audience Dominique Michelucci, Pascal Schreck, Simon E. B. Thierry, Christoph Fünfzig, Jean-David Génevaux |
Symposium on Solid and Physical Modeling | 3 |
| 2010 | A formalization of geometric constraint systems and their decompositionabstractAbstract For more than a decade, the trend in geometric constraint systems solving has been to use a geometric decomposition/recombination approach. These methods are generally grounded on the invariance of systems under rigid motions. In order to decompose further, other invariance groups (e.g., scalings) have recently been considered. Geometric decomposition is grounded on the possibility to replace a solved subsystem with a smaller system called boundary . This article shows the central property that justifies decomposition, without assuming specific types of constraints or invariance groups. The exact nature of the boundary system is given. This formalization brings out the elements of a general and modular implementation. Pascal Mathis, Simon E. B. Thierry |
Formal Aspects Comput. | 2 |