Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Simon E. B. Thierry

dblp:16/4020 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
0000-0002-9267-746XORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Geometric modeling and processing · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Geometric modeling and processing
geometric constraint solving
0.112011
Extensions of the witness method to characterize under-, over- and well-constrained geometric constraint systems · Comput. Aided Des. 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

witness method · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Extensions of the witness method to characterize under-, over- and well-constrained geometric constraint systems
Simon E. B. Thierry, Pascal Schreck, Dominique Michelucci, Christoph Fünfzig, Jean-David Génevaux
Comput. Aided Des.1
2010 Using the witness method to detect rigid subsystems of geometric constraints in CAD
abstract
International audience
Dominique Michelucci, Pascal Schreck, Simon E. B. Thierry, Christoph Fünfzig, Jean-David Génevaux
Symposium on Solid and Physical Modeling3
2010 A formalization of geometric constraint systems and their decomposition
abstract
Abstract For more than a decade, the trend in geometric constraint systems solving has been to use a geometric decomposition/recombination approach. These methods are generally grounded on the invariance of systems under rigid motions. In order to decompose further, other invariance groups (e.g., scalings) have recently been considered. Geometric decomposition is grounded on the possibility to replace a solved subsystem with a smaller system called boundary . This article shows the central property that justifies decomposition, without assuming specific types of constraints or invariance groups. The exact nature of the boundary system is given. This formalization brings out the elements of a general and modular implementation.
Pascal Mathis, Simon E. B. Thierry
Formal Aspects Comput.2