Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kim McCall

dblp:16/4133 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1992
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 77% Collaborative and social computing · 23%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments › interactive surfaces
large interactive displays
0.011992
Liveboard: A Large Interactive Display Supporting Group Meetings, Presentations, and Remote Collaboration · CHI 1992

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

system design · 0.0informal survey · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1992 Liveboard: A Large Interactive Display Supporting Group Meetings, Presentations, and Remote Collaboration
abstract
This paper describes the Liveboard, a large interactive display system. With nearly one million pixels and an accurate, multi-state, cordless pen, the Liveboard provides a basis for research on user interfaces for group meetings, presentations and remote collaboration. We describe the underlying hardware and software of the Liveboard, along with several software applications that have been developed. In describing the system, we point out the design rationale that was used to make various choices. We present the results of an informal survey of Liveboard users, and describe some of the improvements that have been made in response to user feedback. We conclude with several general observations about the use of large public interactive displays.
Scott Elrod, Richard H. Bruce, Rich Gold, David Goldberg 0001, Frank G. Halasz, William C. Janssen Jr., David D. Lee, Kim McCall, Elin Rønby Pedersen, Kenneth A. Pier, John C. Tang, Brent B. Welch
CHI8