Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

James G. Keeton-Williams

dblp:16/4577 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1980
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program verification · 87% Programming languages and type systems · 13%
Network and information security
1 paper
Systems and software security · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Systems and software security
security verification
0.011980
Demonstrating Security for Trusted Applications on a Security Kernel Base · S&P 1980
Program verification
concurrent program verification
0.011979
Principles of Proving Programs Correct in Gypsy · POPL 1979
Program verification
deductive verification
0.011979
Principles of Proving Programs Correct in Gypsy · POPL 1979
Systems and software security
operating system security
0.011980
Demonstrating Security for Trusted Applications on a Security Kernel Base · S&P 1980
Systems and software security › operating system security
security kernel
0.011980
Demonstrating Security for Trusted Applications on a Security Kernel Base · S&P 1980
Programming languages and type systems
language design
0.011979
Principles of Proving Programs Correct in Gypsy · POPL 1979

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

security criteria authentication · 0.0formal verification · 0.0proof methods · 0.0formal specification · 0.0automated verification · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1980 Demonstrating Security for Trusted Applications on a Security Kernel Base
abstract
A methodology for demonstrating the security of trusted applications on a security kernel base is presented. The methodology consists of selecting and authenticating security criteria, and demonstrating through verification techniques that the implementation obeys the selected criteria. Difficulties encountered in the placement of a trusted application on top of a security kernel base motivated the development of the methodology.
Stanley R. Ames Jr., James G. Keeton-Williams
S&P2
1979 Principles of Proving Programs Correct in Gypsy
abstract
Concurrency in Gypsy is based on a unique, formal approach to specifying and proving systems of concurrent processes. The specification and proof methods are designed so that proofs of individual processes are totally independent, even when operating concurrently. These methods can be applied both to terminating and non-terminating processes, and the proof methods are well suited to automated verification aids. The basic principles of these methods and their interaction with the design of Gypsy are described.
Donald I. Good, Richard M. Cohen, James G. Keeton-Williams
POPL3