Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Anthony J. Winkler

dblp:16/5324 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1979
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Database system architecture and tuning · 50% Information retrieval · 50%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › query processing
boolean query processing
0.011971
File Structure Determination · SIGIR 1971
Database system architecture and tuning › database design
physical database design
0.011971
File Structure Determination · SIGIR 1971
Performance modeling and evaluation
simulation
0.011971
File Structure Determination · SIGIR 1971

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.0analytical modeling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1979 Roles of the data dictionary system
Belkis Leong-Hong, Alexander R. DeVito, Ronald H. Rolland, Albert W. Earle, Anthony J. Winkler
COMPSAC5
1971 File Structure Determination
abstract
An approach to determining an appropriate file structure for a given application is presented, by outlining a methodology for comparing some important aspects of data management system performance. The aspect chosen for analysis is the processing time required to evaluate Boolean functions defined on data values contained within a file structure and select elements from the structure satisfying the expression.Two file structures are studied. The structures are each combinations of hierarchical and inverted file organizations, which differ in the use of the pointers contained in the inverted file. In one case they link a value to nodes corresponding to its occurrence in the data hierarchy and in the second they link a value to the entry which contains the node corresponding to an occurrence.Algorithms for processing within each of the structures are discussed. Each algorithm is then modeled, and approximating models developed for simulation of the algorithms.
Anthony J. Winkler, Alfred G. Dale
SIGIR1