Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dominique Mouchiroud

dblp:16/5795 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene regulation
0.012002
CpGProD: identifying CpG islands associated with transcription start sites in large genomic mammalian sequences · Bioinform. 2002
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation › promoter analysis
promoter prediction
0.012002
CpGProD: identifying CpG islands associated with transcription start sites in large genomic mammalian sequences · Bioinform. 2002
Bioinformatics and computational biology › phylogenetics
evolutionary distance estimation
0.011999
JaDis: computing distances between nucleic acid sequences · Bioinform. 1999
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence analysis
0.011999
JaDis: computing distances between nucleic acid sequences · Bioinform. 1999
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation › promoter analysis
transcription start site identification
0.012002
CpGProD: identifying CpG islands associated with transcription start sites in large genomic mammalian sequences · Bioinform. 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

java · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2007 Unexpected observations after mapping LongSAGE tags to the human genome
abstract
BACKGROUND: SAGE has been used widely to study the expression of known transcripts, but much less to annotate new transcribed regions. LongSAGE produces tags that are sufficiently long to be reliably mapped to a whole-genome sequence. Here we used this property to study the position of human LongSAGE tags obtained from all public libraries. We focused mainly on tags that do not map to known transcripts. RESULTS: Using a published error rate in SAGE libraries, we first removed the tags likely to result from sequencing errors. We then observed that an unexpectedly large number of the remaining tags still did not match the genome sequence. Some of these correspond to parts of human mRNAs, such as polyA tails, junctions between two exons and polymorphic regions of transcripts. Another non-negligible proportion can be attributed to contamination by murine transcripts and to residual sequencing errors. After filtering out our data with these screens to ensure that our dataset is highly reliable, we studied the tags that map once to the genome. 31% of these tags correspond to unannotated transcripts. The others map to known transcribed regions, but many of them (nearly half) are located either in antisense or in new variants of these known transcripts. CONCLUSION: We performed a comprehensive study of all publicly available human LongSAGE tags, and carefully verified the reliability of these data. We found the potential origin of many tags that did not match the human genome sequence. The properties of the remaining tags imply that the level of sequencing error may have been under-estimated. The frequency of tags matching once the genome sequence but not in an annotated exon suggests that the human transcriptome is much more complex than shown by the current human genome annotations, with many new splicing variants and antisense transcripts. SAGE data is appropriate to map new transcripts to the genome, as demonstrated by the high rate of cross-validation of the corresponding tags using other methods.
Céline Keime, Marie Sémon, Dominique Mouchiroud, Laurent Duret, Olivier Gandrillon
BMC Bioinform.3
2004 Identitag, a relational database for SAGE tag identification and interspecies comparison of SAGE libraries
abstract
BACKGROUND: Serial Analysis of Gene Expression (SAGE) is a method of large-scale gene expression analysis that has the potential to generate the full list of mRNAs present within a cell population at a given time and their frequency. An essential step in SAGE library analysis is the unambiguous assignment of each 14 bp tag to the transcript from which it was derived. This process, called tag-to-gene mapping, represents a step that has to be improved in the analysis of SAGE libraries. Indeed, the existing web sites providing correspondence between tags and transcripts do not concern all species for which numerous EST and cDNA have already been sequenced. RESULTS: This is the reason why we designed and implemented a freely available tool called Identitag for tag identification that can be used in any species for which transcript sequences are available. Identitag is based on a relational database structure in order to allow rapid and easy storage and updating of data and, most importantly, in order to be able to precisely define identification parameters. This structure can be seen like three interconnected modules : the first one stores virtual tags extracted from a given list of transcript sequences, the second stores experimental tags observed in SAGE experiments, and the third allows the annotation of the transcript sequences used for virtual tag extraction. It therefore connects an observed tag to a virtual tag and to the sequence it comes from, and then to its functional annotation when available. Databases made from different species can be connected according to orthology relationship thus allowing the comparison of SAGE libraries between species. We successfully used Identitag to identify tags from our chicken SAGE libraries and for chicken to human SAGE tags interspecies comparison. Identitag sources are freely available on http://pbil.univ-lyon1.fr/software/identitag/ web site. CONCLUSIONS: Identitag is a flexible and powerful tool for tag identification in any single species and for interspecies comparison of SAGE libraries. It opens the way to comparative transcriptomic analysis, an emerging branch of biology.
Céline Keime, Francesca Damiola, Dominique Mouchiroud, Laurent Duret, Olivier Gandrillon
BMC Bioinform.3
2002 CpGProD: identifying CpG islands associated with transcription start sites in large genomic mammalian sequences
abstract
RESULTS: CpGProD is an application for identifying mammalian promoter regions associated with CpG islands in large genomic sequences. Although it is strictly dedicated to this particular promoter class corresponding to approximately 50% of the genes, CpGProD exhibits a higher sensitivity and specificity than other tools used for promoter prediction. Notably, CpGProD uses different parameters according to species (human, mouse) studied. Moreover, CpGProD predicts the promoter orientation on the DNA strand. AVAILABILITY: http://pbil.univ-lyon1.fr/software/cpgprod.html SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: http://pbil.univ-lyon1.fr/software/cpgprod.html
Loïc Ponger, Dominique Mouchiroud
Bioinform.2
1999 JaDis: computing distances between nucleic acid sequences
abstract
SUMMARY: JaDis is a Java application for computing evolutionary distances between nucleic acid sequences and G+C base frequencies. It allows specific comparison of coding sequences, of non-coding sequences or of a non-coding sequence with coding sequences. AVAILABILITY: http://pbil.univ-lyon1.fr/software/jadis.html
Isabelle Gonçalves, Marc Robinson-Rechavi, Guy Perrière, Dominique Mouchiroud
Bioinform.4