Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Y.-M. Tang

dblp:16/6033 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Programming languages and type systems · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Programming languages and type systems
language design
0.012001
Modeling statecharts and activitycharts as signal equations · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2001
Programming languages and type systems
language semantics
0.012001
Modeling statecharts and activitycharts as signal equations · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2001
Programming languages and type systems › domain-specific languages
synchronous languages
0.012001
Modeling statecharts and activitycharts as signal equations · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statecharts · 0.0equational modeling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2001 Modeling statecharts and activitycharts as signal equations
abstract
The languages for modeling reactive systems are of different styles, like the imperative, state-based ones and the declarative, data-flow ones. They are adapted to different application domains. This paper, through the example of the languages Statecharts and Signal, shows a way to give a model of an imperative specification (Statecharts) in a declarative, equational one (Signal). This model constitutes a formal model of the Statemate semantics of Statecharts, upon which formal analysis techniques can be applied. Being a transformation from an imperative to a declarative structure, it involves the definition of generic models for the explicit management of state (in the case of control as well as of data). In order to obtain a structural construction of the model, a hierarchical and modular organization is proposed, including proper management and propagation of control along the hierarchy. The results presented here cover the essential features of Statecharts as well as of another language of Statemate: Activitycharts. As a translation, it makes multiformalism specification possible, and provides support for the integrated operation of the languages. The motivation lies also in the perspective of gaining access to the various formal analysis and implementation tools of the synchronous technology, using the DC1 exchange format, as in the Sacres programming environment.
Jean-René Beauvais, Éric Rutten, Roland Houdebine, Paul Le Guernic, Y.-M. Tang
ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol.6