Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stanislav Volik

dblp:16/6167 · also Stanislav V. Volik · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-8379-8887ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
4 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics
phenotype prediction
0.812024
Phenotype prediction from single-cell RNA-seq data using attention-based neural networks · Bioinform. 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis › single-cell RNA sequencing
single-cell RNA-seq analysis
0.812024
Phenotype prediction from single-cell RNA-seq data using attention-based neural networks · Bioinform. 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence analysis
0.722019
Alignment-free clustering of UMI tagged DNA molecules · Bioinform. 2019
SiNVICT: ultra-sensitive detection of single nucleotide variants and indels in circulating tumour DNA · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence clustering
read clustering
0.412019
Alignment-free clustering of UMI tagged DNA molecules · Bioinform. 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
sequencing data processing
0.412019
Alignment-free clustering of UMI tagged DNA molecules · Bioinform. 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics
0.312017
SiNVICT: ultra-sensitive detection of single nucleotide variants and indels in circulating tumour DNA · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence variation analysis
indel detection
0.312017
SiNVICT: ultra-sensitive detection of single nucleotide variants and indels in circulating tumour DNA · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence variation analysis
single nucleotide variant detection
0.312017
SiNVICT: ultra-sensitive detection of single nucleotide variants and indels in circulating tumour DNA · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
variant calling
0.312017
SiNVICT: ultra-sensitive detection of single nucleotide variants and indels in circulating tumour DNA · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
gene fusion detection
0.112011
Comrad: detection of expressed rearrangements by integrated analysis of RNA-Seq and low coverage genome sequence data · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › structural variation
genomic rearrangement detection
0.112011
Comrad: detection of expressed rearrangements by integrated analysis of RNA-Seq and low coverage genome sequence data · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology
transcriptomics
0.012011
Comrad: detection of expressed rearrangements by integrated analysis of RNA-Seq and low coverage genome sequence data · Bioinform. 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

neural network · 0.8mixup data augmentation · 0.8attention mechanism · 0.8minhashing · 0.4locality-sensitive hashing · 0.4graph connected components · 0.4time-series analysis · 0.3integrated RNA-Seq and whole genome shotgun sequencing analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Phenotype prediction from single-cell RNA-seq data using attention-based neural networks
abstract
MOTIVATION: A patient's disease phenotype can be driven and determined by specific groups of cells whose marker genes are either unknown or can only be detected at late-stage using conventional bulk assays such as RNA-Seq technology. Recent advances in single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) enable gene expression profiling in cell-level resolution, and therefore have the potential to identify those cells driving the disease phenotype even while the number of these cells is small. However, most existing methods rely heavily on accurate cell type detection, and the number of available annotated samples is usually too small for training deep learning predictive models. RESULTS: Here, we propose the method ScRAT for phenotype prediction using scRNA-seq data. To train ScRAT with a limited number of samples of different phenotypes, such as coronavirus disease (COVID) and non-COVID, ScRAT first applies a mixup module to increase the number of training samples. A multi-head attention mechanism is employed to learn the most informative cells for each phenotype without relying on a given cell type annotation. Using three public COVID datasets, we show that ScRAT outperforms other phenotype prediction methods. The performance edge of ScRAT over its competitors increases as the number of training samples decreases, indicating the efficacy of our sample mixup. Critical cell types detected based on high-attention cells also support novel findings in the original papers and the recent literature. This suggests that ScRAT overcomes the challenge of missing marker genes and limited sample number with great potential revealing novel molecular mechanisms and/or therapies. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The code of our proposed method ScRAT is published at https://github.com/yuzhenmao/ScRAT.
Yuzhen Mao, Yen-Yi Lin, Nelson K. Y. Wong, Stanislav Volik, Funda Sar, Colin C. Collins, Martin Ester
Bioinform.4
2019 Alignment-free clustering of UMI tagged DNA molecules
abstract
MOTIVATION: Next-Generation Sequencing has led to the availability of massive genomic datasets whose processing raises many challenges, including the handling of sequencing errors. This is especially pertinent in cancer genomics, e.g. for detecting low allele frequency variations from circulating tumor DNA. Barcode tagging of DNA molecules with unique molecular identifiers (UMI) attempts to mitigate sequencing errors; UMI tagged molecules are polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplified, and the PCR copies of UMI tagged molecules are sequenced independently. However, the PCR and sequencing steps can generate errors in the sequenced reads that can be located in the barcode and/or the DNA sequence. Analyzing UMI tagged sequencing data requires an initial clustering step, with the aim of grouping reads sequenced from PCR duplicates of the same UMI tagged molecule into a single cluster, and the size of the current datasets requires this clustering process to be resource-efficient. RESULTS: We introduce Calib, a computational tool that clusters paired-end reads from UMI tagged sequencing experiments generated by substitution-error-dominant sequencing platforms such as Illumina. Calib clusters are defined as connected components of a graph whose edges are defined in terms of both barcode similarity and read sequence similarity. The graph is constructed efficiently using locality sensitive hashing and MinHashing techniques. Calib's default clustering parameters are optimized empirically, for different UMI and read lengths, using a simulation module that is packaged with Calib. Compared to other tools, Calib has the best accuracy on simulated data, while maintaining reasonable runtime and memory footprint. On a real dataset, Calib runs with far less resources than alignment-based methods, and its clusters reduce the number of tentative false positive in downstream variation calling. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Calib is implemented in C++ and its simulation module is implemented in Python. Calib is available at https://github.com/vpc-ccg/calib. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Baraa Orabi, Emre Erhan, Brian McConeghy, Stanislav Volik, Stephane Le Bihan, Robert Bell, Colin C. Collins, Cédric Chauve, Faraz Hach
Bioinform.4
2017 SiNVICT: ultra-sensitive detection of single nucleotide variants and indels in circulating tumour DNA
abstract
MOTIVATION: Successful development and application of precision oncology approaches require robust elucidation of the genomic landscape of a patient's cancer and, ideally, the ability to monitor therapy-induced genomic changes in the tumour in an inexpensive and minimally invasive manner. Thanks to recent advances in sequencing technologies, 'liquid biopsy', the sampling of patient's bodily fluids such as blood and urine, is considered as one of the most promising approaches to achieve this goal. In many cancer patients, and especially those with advanced metastatic disease, deep sequencing of circulating cell free DNA (cfDNA) obtained from patient's blood yields a mixture of reads originating from the normal DNA and from multiple tumour subclones-called circulating tumour DNA or ctDNA. The ctDNA/cfDNA ratio as well as the proportion of ctDNA originating from specific tumour subclones depend on multiple factors, making comprehensive detection of mutations difficult, especially at early stages of cancer. Furthermore, sensitive and accurate detection of single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and indels from cfDNA is constrained by several factors such as the sequencing errors and PCR artifacts, and mapping errors related to repeat regions within the genome. In this article, we introduce SiNVICT, a computational method that increases the sensitivity and specificity of SNV and indel detection at very low variant allele frequencies. SiNVICT has the capability to handle multiple sequencing platforms with different error properties; it minimizes false positives resulting from mapping errors and other technology specific artifacts including strand bias and low base quality at read ends. SiNVICT also has the capability to perform time-series analysis, where samples from a patient sequenced at multiple time points are jointly examined to report locations of interest where there is a possibility that certain clones were wiped out by some treatment while some subclones gained selective advantage. RESULTS: We tested SiNVICT on simulated data as well as prostate cancer cell lines and cfDNA obtained from castration-resistant prostate cancer patients. On both simulated and biological data, SiNVICT was able to detect SNVs and indels with variant allele percentages as low as 0.5%. The lowest amounts of total DNA used for the biological data where SNVs and indels could be detected with very high sensitivity were 2.5 ng on the Ion Torrent platform and 10 ng on Illumina. With increased sequencing and mapping accuracy, SiNVICT might be utilized in clinical settings, making it possible to track the progress of point mutations and indels that are associated with resistance to cancer therapies and provide patients personalized treatment. We also compared SiNVICT with other popular SNV callers such as MuTect, VarScan2 and Freebayes. Our results show that SiNVICT performs better than these tools in most cases and allows further data exploration such as time-series analysis on cfDNA sequencing data. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: SiNVICT is available at: https://sfu-compbio.github.io/sinvictSupplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. CONTACT: [email protected].
Can Kockan, Faraz Hach, Iman Sarrafi, Robert H. Bell, Brian McConeghy, Kevin Beja, Anne Haegert, Alexander Wyatt, Stanislav Volik, Kim N. Chi, Colin C. Collins, Süleyman Cenk Sahinalp
Bioinform.9
2011 Comrad: detection of expressed rearrangements by integrated analysis of RNA-Seq and low coverage genome sequence data
abstract
MOTIVATION: Comrad is a novel algorithmic framework for the integrated analysis of RNA-Seq and whole genome shotgun sequencing (WGSS) data for the purposes of discovering genomic rearrangements and aberrant transcripts. The Comrad framework leverages the advantages of both RNA-Seq and WGSS data, providing accurate classification of rearrangements as expressed or not expressed and accurate classification of the genomic or non-genomic origin of aberrant transcripts. A major benefit of Comrad is its ability to accurately identify aberrant transcripts and associated rearrangements using low coverage genome data. As a result, a Comrad analysis can be performed at a cost comparable to that of two RNA-Seq experiments, significantly lower than an analysis requiring high coverage genome data. RESULTS: We have applied Comrad to the discovery of gene fusions and read-throughs in prostate cancer cell line C4-2, a derivative of the LNCaP cell line with androgen-independent characteristics. As a proof of concept, we have rediscovered in the C4-2 data 4 of the 6 fusions previously identified in LNCaP. We also identified six novel fusion transcripts and associated genomic breakpoints, and verified their existence in LNCaP, suggesting that Comrad may be more sensitive than previous methods that have been applied to fusion discovery in LNCaP. We show that many of the gene fusions discovered using Comrad would be difficult to identify using currently available techniques. AVAILABILITY: A C++ and Perl implementation of the method demonstrated in this article is available at http://compbio.cs.sfu.ca/.
Andrew W. McPherson, Chunxiao Wu, Iman Hajirasouliha, Fereydoun Hormozdiari, Faraz Hach, Anna Lapuk, Stanislav Volik, Sohrab P. Shah, Colin C. Collins, Süleyman Cenk Sahinalp
Bioinform.7
2008 Evaluation of Paired-End Sequencing Strategies for Detection of Genome Rearrangements in Cancer
abstract
Paired-end sequencing is emerging as a key technique for assessing genome rearrangements and structural variation on a genome-wide scale. This technique is particularly useful for detecting copy-neutral rearrangements, such as inversions and translocations, which are common in cancer and can produce novel fusion genes. We address the question of how much sequencing is required to detect rearrangement breakpoints and to localize them precisely using both theoretical models and simulation. We derive a formula for the probability that a fusion gene exists in a cancer genome given a collection of paired-end sequences from this genome. We use this formula to compute fusion gene probabilities in several breast cancer samples, and we find that we are able to accurately predict fusion genes in these samples with a relatively small number of fragments of large size. We further demonstrate how the ability to detect fusion genes depends on the distribution of gene lengths, and we evaluate how different parameters of a sequencing strategy impact breakpoint detection, breakpoint localization, and fusion gene detection, even in the presence of errors that suggest false rearrangements. These results will be useful in calibrating future cancer sequencing efforts, particularly large-scale studies of many cancer genomes that are enabled by next-generation sequencing technologies.
Ali Bashir, Stanislav Volik, Colin C. Collins, Vineet Bafna, Benjamin J. Raphael
PLoS Comput. Biol.2