Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Levke Bentzien
dblp:16/6302
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 3 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Computational complexity · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational complexity › reduction
bounded truth-table reductions |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Separating NP-Completeness Notions under Strong Hypotheses · CCC 1997 |
Computational complexity › structural complexity
resource-bounded measure |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Separating NP-Completeness Notions under Strong Hypotheses · CCC 1997 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | Separating NP-Completeness Notions under Strong Hypotheses
Klaus Ambos-Spies, Levke Bentzien |
J. Comput. Syst. Sci. | 2 |
| 1998 | Positive Turing and Truth-Table Completeness for NEXP Are Incomparable
Levke Bentzien |
MFCS | 1 |
| 1997 | Separating NP-Completeness Notions under Strong HypothesesabstractJ.H. Lutz (1993) proposed the study of the structure of the class NP=NTIME(poly) under the hypothesis that NP does not have p-measure 0 (with respect to Lutz's resource bounded measure. J.H. Lutz and E. Mayordomo (1996) showed that, under this hypothesis, NP-m-completeness and NP-T-completeness differ and they conjectured that further NP-completeness notions can be separated. Here we prove this conjecture for the bounded-query reducibilities. In fact we consider a new weaker hypothesis, namely the assumption that NP is not p-meager with respect to the resource bounded Baire category concept of Ambos-Spies et al.. We show that this category hypothesis is sufficient to get: (i) For every k/spl ges/2, NP-btt(k)-completeness is stronger than NP-btt(k+1)-completeness. (ii) For every k/spl ges/1, NP-bT(k)-completeness and NP-btt(k+1)-completeness are both stronger than NP-bT(k+1)-completeness. (iii) NP-btt-completeness is stronger than NP-tt-completeness. Klaus Ambos-Spies, Levke Bentzien |
CCC | 2 |