Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Cheng Li 0063
dblp:16/6465-63
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-7522-7072ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 50% Learning theory · 25% Efficient and distributed learning · 25% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Distributed Bayesian Varying Coefficient Modeling Using a Gaussian Process Prior · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression › probabilistic regression
bayesian regression |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Distributed Bayesian Varying Coefficient Modeling Using a Gaussian Process Prior · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed inference
distributed bayesian inference |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Distributed Bayesian Varying Coefficient Modeling Using a Gaussian Process Prior · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › nonparametric regression
varying coefficient model |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Distributed Bayesian Varying Coefficient Modeling Using a Gaussian Process Prior · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gaussian process · 0.6divide-and-conquer · 0.6data augmentation · 0.6MCMC · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Convergence Analysis of Stochastic Kriging-Assisted Simulation with Random CovariatesabstractWe consider performing simulation experiments in the presence of covariates. Here, covariates refer to some input information other than system designs to the simulation model that can also affect the system performance. To make decisions, decision makers need to know the covariate values of the problem. Traditionally in simulation-based decision making, simulation samples are collected after the covariate values are known; in contrast, as a new framework, simulation with covariates starts the simulation before the covariate values are revealed and collects samples on covariate values that might appear later. Then, when the covariate values are revealed, the collected simulation samples are directly used to predict the desired results. This framework significantly reduces the decision time compared with the traditional way of simulation. In this paper, we follow this framework and suppose there are a finite number of system designs. We adopt the metamodel of stochastic kriging (SK) and use it to predict the system performance of each design and the best design. The goal is to study how fast the prediction errors diminish with the number of covariate points sampled. This is a fundamental problem in simulation with covariates and helps quantify the relationship between the offline simulation efforts and the online prediction accuracy. Particularly, we adopt measures of the maximal integrated mean squared error (IMSE) and integrated probability of false selection (IPFS) for assessing errors of the system performance and the best design predictions. Then, we establish convergence rates for the two measures under mild conditions. Last, these convergence behaviors are illustrated numerically using test examples. History: Accepted by Bruno Tuffin, area editor for simulation. Funding: This work was supported in part by Singapore Ministry of Education Academic Research Funds [Tier 1 Grants R-155-000-201-114 and A-0004822-00-00], the City University of Hong Kong [Grants 7005269 and 7005568], and the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant 72091211]. Supplemental Material: The software that supports the findings of this study is available within the paper and its Supplemental Information ( https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/suppl/10.1287/ijoc.2022.1263 ) as well as from the IJOC GitHub software repository ( https://github.com/INFORMSJoC/2021.0329 ) at ( http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7344997 ). Cheng Li 0063, Siyang Gao, Jianzhong Du |
INFORMS J. Comput. | 1 |
| 2022 | Distributed Bayesian Varying Coefficient Modeling Using a Gaussian Process PriorabstractVarying coefficient models (VCMs) are widely used for estimating nonlinear regression functions for functional data. Their Bayesian variants using Gaussian process priors on the functional coefficients, however, have received limited attention in massive data applications, mainly due to the prohibitively slow posterior computations using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms. We address this problem using a divide-and-conquer Bayesian approach. We first create a large number of data subsamples with much smaller sizes. Then, we formulate the VCM as a linear mixed-effects model and develop a data augmentation algorithm for obtaining MCMC draws on all the subsets in parallel. Finally, we aggregate the MCMC-based estimates of subset posteriors into a single Aggregated Monte Carlo (AMC) posterior, which is used as a computationally efficient alternative to the true posterior distribution. Theoretically, we derive minimax optimal posterior convergence rates for the AMC posteriors of both the varying coefficients and the mean regression function. We provide quantification on the orders of subset sample sizes and the number of subsets. The empirical results show that the combination schemes that satisfy our theoretical assumptions, including the AMC posterior, have better estimation performance than their main competitors across diverse simulations and in a real data analysis. Rajarshi Guhaniyogi, Cheng Li 0063, Terrance D. Savitsky, Sanvesh Srivastava |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |