Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Steven M. Day

dblp:16/6859 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0001-9924-9524ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers
High-performance computing · 71% GPUs and heterogeneous computing · 29%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Environmental and earth informatics · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
GPUs and heterogeneous computing › GPU-accelerated scientific computing
GPU-accelerated simulation
0.422016
High-frequency nonlinear earthquake simulations on petascale heterogeneous supercomputers · SC 2016
Physics-based seismic hazard analysis on petascale heterogeneous supercomputers · SC 2013
High-performance computing › scientific computing systems
earthquake simulation
0.422016
High-frequency nonlinear earthquake simulations on petascale heterogeneous supercomputers · SC 2016
Scalable Earthquake Simulation on Petascale Supercomputers · SC 2010
High-performance computing
scientific computing
0.322013
Physics-based seismic hazard analysis on petascale heterogeneous supercomputers · SC 2013
Scalable Earthquake Simulation on Petascale Supercomputers · SC 2010
High-performance computing
performance optimization at scale
0.212016
High-frequency nonlinear earthquake simulations on petascale heterogeneous supercomputers · SC 2016
High-performance computing
scientific computing systems
0.212016
High-frequency nonlinear earthquake simulations on petascale heterogeneous supercomputers · SC 2016
Environmental and earth informatics
geophysics
0.222013
Scalable Earthquake Simulation on Petascale Supercomputers · SC 2010
Physics-based seismic hazard analysis on petascale heterogeneous supercomputers · SC 2013
Environmental and earth informatics › geophysics
seismic wave propagation
0.112010
Scalable Earthquake Simulation on Petascale Supercomputers · SC 2010
High-performance computing
large-scale simulation
0.012010
Scalable Earthquake Simulation on Petascale Supercomputers · SC 2010
High-performance computing › supercomputing
petascale computing
0.012010
Scalable Earthquake Simulation on Petascale Supercomputers · SC 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

finite difference · 0.5communication-computation overlap · 0.3drucker-prager yield condition · 0.2CUDA kernel optimization · 0.2parallel mesh computation · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 High-frequency nonlinear earthquake simulations on petascale heterogeneous supercomputers
abstract
The omission of nonlinear effects in large-scale 3D ground motion estimation, which are particularly challenging due to memory and scalability issues, can result in costly misguidance for structural design in earthquake-prone regions. We have implemented nonlinearity using a Drucker-Prager yield condition in AWP-ODC and further optimized the CUDA kernels to more efficiently utilize the GPU's memory bandwidth. The application has resulted in a significant increase in the model region and accuracy for state-of-the-art earthquake simulations in a realistic earth structure, which are now able to resolve the wavefield at frequencies relevant for the most vulnerable buildings (> 1 Hz) while maintaining the scalability and efficiency of the method. We successfully run the code on 4,200 Kepler K20X GPUs on NCSA Blue Waters and OLCF Titan to simulate a M 7.7 earthquake on the southern San Andreas fault with a spatial resolution of 25 m for frequencies up to 4 Hz.
Daniel Roten, Yifeng Cui, Kim B. Olsen, Steven M. Day, Kyle Withers, William H. Savran, Dawei Mu
SC4
2013 Physics-based seismic hazard analysis on petascale heterogeneous supercomputers
abstract
We have developed a highly scalable and efficient GPU-based finite-difference code (AWP) for earthquake simulation that implements high throughput, memory locality, communication reduction and communication/computation overlap and achieves linear scalability on Cray XK7 Titan at ORNL and NCSA's Blue Waters system. We simulate realistic 0-10 Hz earthquake ground motions relevant to building engineering design using high-performance AWP. Moreover, we show that AWP provides a speedup by a factor of 110 in key strain tensor calculations critical to probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA). These performance improvements to critical scientific application software, coupled with improved co-scheduling capabilities of our workflow-managed systems, make a statewide hazard model a goal reachable with existing supercomputers. The performance improvements of GPU-based AWP are expected to save millions of core-hours over the next few years as physics-based seismic hazard analysis is developed using heterogeneous petascale supercomputers.
Yifeng Cui, Efecan Poyraz, Kim B. Olsen, Jun Zhou 0008, Kyle Withers, Scott Callaghan, Jeffrey M. Larkin, Clark C. Guest, Dong Ju Choi, Amit Chourasia, Zheqiang Shi, Steven M. Day, Philip Maechling, Thomas H. Jordan
SC12
2010 Scalable Earthquake Simulation on Petascale Supercomputers
abstract
Petascale simulations are needed to understand the rupture and wave dynamics of the largest earthquakes at shaking frequencies required to engineer safe structures (> 1 Hz). Toward this goal, we have developed a highly scalable, parallel application (AWP-ODC) that has achieved “M8”: a full dynamical simulation of a magnitude-8 earthquake on the southern San Andreas fault up to 2 Hz. M8 was calculated using a uniform mesh of 436 billion 40-m3cubes to represent the three-dimensional crustal structure of Southern California, in a 800 km by 400 km area, home to over 20 million people. This production run producing 360 sec of wave propagation sustained 220 Tflop/s for 24 hours on NCCS Jaguar using 223,074 cores. As the largest-ever earthquake simulation, M8 opens new territory for earthquake science and engineering - the physics-based modeling of the largest seismic hazards with the goal of reducing their potential for loss of life and property.
Yifeng Cui, Kim B. Olsen, Thomas H. Jordan, Kwangyoon Lee, Jun Zhou 0008, Patrick Small, Daniel Roten, Geoffrey Ely, Dhabaleswar K. Panda 0001, Amit Chourasia, John M. Levesque, Steven M. Day, Philip Maechling
SC12