Benjamin A. Dunn

dblp:160/0180 · also Benjamin Adric Dunn · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 44% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 22% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 17%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning
0.712023
Understanding Neural Coding on Latent Manifolds by Sharing Features and Dividing Ensembles · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › shared representation
feature sharing
0.712023
Understanding Neural Coding on Latent Manifolds by Sharing Features and Dividing Ensembles · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › computational neuroscience
neural coding
0.712023
Understanding Neural Coding on Latent Manifolds by Sharing Features and Dividing Ensembles · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › minimax optimization
adversarial optimization
0.512021
Removing Inter-Experimental Variability from Functional Data in Systems Neuroscience · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain adaptation
0.512021
Removing Inter-Experimental Variability from Functional Data in Systems Neuroscience · NeurIPS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

domain adaptation · 1.0adversarial optimization · 1.0latent manifold learning · 0.7ensemble learning · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Understanding Neural Coding on Latent Manifolds by Sharing Features and Dividing Ensembles
Martin Bjerke, Lukas Schott, Kristopher T. Jensen, Claudia Battistin, David A. Klindt, Benjamin A. Dunn
ICLR6
2021 Removing Inter-Experimental Variability from Functional Data in Systems Neuroscience
abstract
Integrating data from multiple experiments is common practice in systems neuroscience but it requires inter-experimental variability to be negligible compared to the biological signal of interest. This requirement is rarely fulfilled; systematic changes between experiments can drastically affect the outcome of complex analysis pipelines. Modern machine learning approaches designed to adapt models across multiple data domains offer flexible ways of removing inter-experimental variability where classical statistical methods often fail. While applications of these methods have been mostly limited to single-cell genomics, in this work, we develop a theoretical framework for domain adaptation in systems neuroscience. We implement this in an adversarial optimization scheme that removes inter-experimental variability while preserving the biological signal. We compare our method to previous approaches on a large-scale dataset of two-photon imaging recordings of retinal bipolar cell responses to visual stimuli. This dataset provides a unique benchmark as it contains biological signal from well-defined cell types that is obscured by large inter-experimental variability. In a supervised setting, we compare the generalization performance of cell type classifiers across experiments, which we validate with anatomical cell type distributions from electron microscopy data. In an unsupervised setting, we remove inter-experimental variability from the data which can then be fed into arbitrary downstream analyses. In both settings, we find that our method achieves the best trade-off between removing inter-experimental variability and preserving biological signal. Thus, we offer a flexible approach to remove inter-experimental variability and integrate datasets across experiments in systems neuroscience. Code available at https://github.com/eulerlab/rave.
Dominic Gonschorek, Larissa Höfling, Klaudia P. Szatko, Katrin Franke, Timm Schubert, Benjamin A. Dunn, Philipp Berens, David A. Klindt, Thomas Euler
NeurIPS6
2019 Decoding of Neural Data Using Cohomological Feature Extraction
abstract
We introduce a novel data-driven approach to discover and decode features in the neural code coming from large population neural recordings with minimal assumptions, using cohomological feature extraction. We apply our approach to neural recordings of mice moving freely in a box, where we find a circular feature. We then observe that the decoded value corresponds well to the head direction of the mouse. Thus, we capture head direction cells and decode the head direction from the neural population activity without having to process the mouse's behavior. Interestingly, the decoded values convey more information about the neural activity than the tracked head direction does, with differences that have some spatial organization. Finally, we note that the residual population activity, after the head direction has been accounted for, retains some low-dimensional structure that is correlated with the speed of the mouse.
Erik Rybakken, Nils A. Baas, Benjamin A. Dunn
Neural Comput.3
2015 Correlations and Functional Connections in a Population of Grid Cells
abstract
We study the statistics of spike trains of simultaneously recorded grid cells in freely behaving rats. We evaluate pairwise correlations between these cells and, using a maximum entropy kinetic pairwise model (kinetic Ising model), study their functional connectivity. Even when we account for the covariations in firing rates due to overlapping fields, both the pairwise correlations and functional connections decay as a function of the shortest distance between the vertices of the spatial firing pattern of pairs of grid cells, i.e. their phase difference. They take positive values between cells with nearby phases and approach zero or negative values for larger phase differences. We find similar results also when, in addition to correlations due to overlapping fields, we account for correlations due to theta oscillations and head directional inputs. The inferred connections between neurons in the same module and those from different modules can be both negative and positive, with a mean close to zero, but with the strongest inferred connections found between cells of the same module. Taken together, our results suggest that grid cells in the same module do indeed form a local network of interconnected neurons with a functional connectivity that supports a role for attractor dynamics in the generation of grid pattern.
Benjamin A. Dunn, Maria Mørreaunet, Yasser Roudi
PLoS Comput. Biol.1