Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

J. Harry Caufield

dblp:160/0185 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-5705-7831ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 4 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 65% Medical and health informatics · 20% Computational science and engineering · 16%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 67% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 33%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › network bioinformatics › biological network analysis
biological knowledge graph
0.712023
KG-Hub - building and exchanging biological knowledge graphs · Bioinform. 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › probabilistic reasoning › probabilistic logic
probabilistic soft logic
0.512021
Clinical Temporal Relation Extraction with Probabilistic Soft Logic Regularization and Global Inference · AAAI 2021
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › relation extraction › event relation extraction
temporal relation extraction
0.512021
Clinical Temporal Relation Extraction with Probabilistic Soft Logic Regularization and Global Inference · AAAI 2021
Medical and health informatics
clinical text processing
0.512021
CREATe: Clinical Report Extraction and Annotation Technology · ICDE 2021
Bioinformatics and computational biology › knowledge representation in biology
biomedical ontology
0.212024
Structured Prompt Interrogation and Recursive Extraction of Semantics (SPIRES): a method for populating knowledge bases using zero-shot learning · Bioinform. 2024
Computational science and engineering
graph learning
0.212023
KG-Hub - building and exchanging biological knowledge graphs · Bioinform. 2023
Computational science and engineering › graph learning
link prediction
0.212023
KG-Hub - building and exchanging biological knowledge graphs · Bioinform. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

zero-shot learning · 0.8relation extraction · 0.8prompt interrogation · 0.8large language model · 0.8node embedding · 0.7graph machine learning · 0.7extract-transform-load · 0.7probabilistic soft logic · 0.5global inference · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Structured Prompt Interrogation and Recursive Extraction of Semantics (SPIRES): a method for populating knowledge bases using zero-shot learning
abstract
MOTIVATION: Creating knowledge bases and ontologies is a time consuming task that relies on manual curation. AI/NLP approaches can assist expert curators in populating these knowledge bases, but current approaches rely on extensive training data, and are not able to populate arbitrarily complex nested knowledge schemas. RESULTS: Here we present Structured Prompt Interrogation and Recursive Extraction of Semantics (SPIRES), a Knowledge Extraction approach that relies on the ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to perform zero-shot learning and general-purpose query answering from flexible prompts and return information conforming to a specified schema. Given a detailed, user-defined knowledge schema and an input text, SPIRES recursively performs prompt interrogation against an LLM to obtain a set of responses matching the provided schema. SPIRES uses existing ontologies and vocabularies to provide identifiers for matched elements. We present examples of applying SPIRES in different domains, including extraction of food recipes, multi-species cellular signaling pathways, disease treatments, multi-step drug mechanisms, and chemical to disease relationships. Current SPIRES accuracy is comparable to the mid-range of existing Relation Extraction methods, but greatly surpasses an LLM's native capability of grounding entities with unique identifiers. SPIRES has the advantage of easy customization, flexibility, and, crucially, the ability to perform new tasks in the absence of any new training data. This method supports a general strategy of leveraging the language interpreting capabilities of LLMs to assemble knowledge bases, assisting manual knowledge curation and acquisition while supporting validation with publicly-available databases and ontologies external to the LLM. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: SPIRES is available as part of the open source OntoGPT package: https://github.com/monarch-initiative/ontogpt.
J. Harry Caufield, Harshad Hegde, Vincent Emonet, Nomi L. Harris, Marcin P. Joachimiak, Nicolas Matentzoglu, HyeongSik Kim 0001, Sierra A. T. Moxon, Justin T. Reese, Melissa A. Haendel, Peter N. Robinson, Chris Mungall
Bioinform.1
2023 KG-Hub - building and exchanging biological knowledge graphs
abstract
MOTIVATION: Knowledge graphs (KGs) are a powerful approach for integrating heterogeneous data and making inferences in biology and many other domains, but a coherent solution for constructing, exchanging, and facilitating the downstream use of KGs is lacking. RESULTS: Here we present KG-Hub, a platform that enables standardized construction, exchange, and reuse of KGs. Features include a simple, modular extract-transform-load pattern for producing graphs compliant with Biolink Model (a high-level data model for standardizing biological data), easy integration of any OBO (Open Biological and Biomedical Ontologies) ontology, cached downloads of upstream data sources, versioned and automatically updated builds with stable URLs, web-browsable storage of KG artifacts on cloud infrastructure, and easy reuse of transformed subgraphs across projects. Current KG-Hub projects span use cases including COVID-19 research, drug repurposing, microbial-environmental interactions, and rare disease research. KG-Hub is equipped with tooling to easily analyze and manipulate KGs. KG-Hub is also tightly integrated with graph machine learning (ML) tools which allow automated graph ML, including node embeddings and training of models for link prediction and node classification. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://kghub.org.
J. Harry Caufield, Tim E. Putman, Kevin Schaper, Deepak R. Unni, Harshad Hegde, Tiffany Callahan, Luca Cappelletti, Sierra A. T. Moxon, Vida Ravanmehr, Seth Carbon, Lauren E. Chan, Katherina G. Cortes, Kent A. Shefchek, Glass Elsarboukh, James P. Balhoff, Tommaso Fontana, Nicolas Matentzoglu, Richard M. Bruskiewich, Anne E. Thessen, Nomi L. Harris, Monica C. Munoz-Torres, Melissa A. Haendel, Peter N. Robinson, Marcin P. Joachimiak, Chris Mungall, Justin T. Reese
Bioinform.1
2021 Clinical Temporal Relation Extraction with Probabilistic Soft Logic Regularization and Global Inference
abstract
There has been a steady need in the medical community to precisely extract the temporal relations between clinical events. In particular, temporal information can facilitate a variety of downstream applications such as case report retrieval and medical question answering. Existing methods either require expensive feature engineering or are incapable of modeling the global relational dependencies among the events. In this paper, we propose a novel method, Clinical Temporal ReLation Exaction with Probabilistic Soft Logic Regularization and Global Inference (CTRL-PG) to tackle the problem at the document level. Extensive experiments on two benchmark datasets, I2B2-2012 and TB-Dense, demonstrate that CTRL-PG significantly outperforms baseline methods for temporal relation extraction.
Yichao Zhou 0001, Rujun Han, J. Harry Caufield, Kai-Wei Chang 0001, Yizhou Sun, Peipei Ping, Wei Wang 0010
AAAI4
2021 CREATe: Clinical Report Extraction and Annotation Technology
abstract
Clinical case reports are written descriptions of the unique aspects of a particular clinical case, playing an essential role in sharing clinical experiences about atypical disease phenotypes and new therapies. However, to our knowledge, there has been no attempt to develop an end-to-end system to annotate, index, or otherwise curate these reports. In this paper, we propose a novel computational resource platform, CREATe, for extracting, indexing, and querying the contents of clinical case reports. CREATe fosters an environment of sustainable resource support and discovery, enabling researchers to overcome the challenges of information science. An online video of the demonstration can be viewed at https://youtu.be/Q8owBQYTjDc.
Yichao Zhou 0001, Bowen Zhang 0002, J. Harry Caufield, Kai-Wei Chang 0001, Yizhou Sun, Peipei Ping, Wei Wang 0010
ICDE5
2017 Bacterial protein meta-interactomes predict cross-species interactions and protein function
abstract
BACKGROUND: Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) can offer compelling evidence for protein function, especially when viewed in the context of proteome-wide interactomes. Bacteria have been popular subjects of interactome studies: more than six different bacterial species have been the subjects of comprehensive interactome studies while several more have had substantial segments of their proteomes screened for interactions. The protein interactomes of several bacterial species have been completed, including several from prominent human pathogens. The availability of interactome data has brought challenges, as these large data sets are difficult to compare across species, limiting their usefulness for broad studies of microbial genetics and evolution. RESULTS: In this study, we use more than 52,000 unique protein-protein interactions (PPIs) across 349 different bacterial species and strains to determine their conservation across data sets and taxonomic groups. When proteins are collapsed into orthologous groups (OGs) the resulting meta-interactome still includes more than 43,000 interactions, about 14,000 of which involve proteins of unknown function. While conserved interactions provide support for protein function in their respective species data, we found only 429 PPIs (~1% of the available data) conserved in two or more species, rendering any cross-species interactome comparison immediately useful. The meta-interactome serves as a model for predicting interactions, protein functions, and even full interactome sizes for species with limited to no experimentally observed PPI, including Bacillus subtilis and Salmonella enterica which are predicted to have up to 18,000 and 31,000 PPIs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the course of this work, we have assembled cross-species interactome comparisons that will allow interactomics researchers to anticipate the structures of yet-unexplored microbial interactomes and to focus on well-conserved yet uncharacterized interactors for further study. Such conserved interactions should provide evidence for important but yet-uncharacterized aspects of bacterial physiology and may provide targets for anti-microbial therapies.
J. Harry Caufield, Christopher Wimble, Shary Semarjit, Stefan Wuchty, Peter Uetz
BMC Bioinform.1
2015 Protein Complexes in Bacteria
abstract
Large-scale analyses of protein complexes have recently become available for Escherichia coli and Mycoplasma pneumoniae, yielding 443 and 116 heteromultimeric soluble protein complexes, respectively. We have coupled the results of these mass spectrometry-characterized protein complexes with the 285 "gold standard" protein complexes identified by EcoCyc. A comparison with databases of gene orthology, conservation, and essentiality identified proteins conserved or lost in complexes of other species. For instance, of 285 "gold standard" protein complexes in E. coli, less than 10% are fully conserved among a set of 7 distantly-related bacterial "model" species. Complex conservation follows one of three models: well-conserved complexes, complexes with a conserved core, and complexes with partial conservation but no conserved core. Expanding the comparison to 894 distinct bacterial genomes illustrates fractional conservation and the limits of co-conservation among components of protein complexes: just 14 out of 285 model protein complexes are perfectly conserved across 95% of the genomes used, yet we predict more than 180 may be partially conserved across at least half of the genomes. No clear relationship between gene essentiality and protein complex conservation is observed, as even poorly conserved complexes contain a significant number of essential proteins. Finally, we identify 183 complexes containing well-conserved components and uncharacterized proteins which will be interesting targets for future experimental studies.
J. Harry Caufield, Marco Abreu, Christopher Wimble, Peter Uetz
PLoS Comput. Biol.1