Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sanghyuk Kwon

dblp:160/0561 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 80% Memory systems · 20%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Memory systems
DRAM
0.212015
CiDRA: A cache-inspired DRAM resilience architecture · HPCA 2015
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › error-correcting codes for memory
DRAM error correction
0.212015
CiDRA: A cache-inspired DRAM resilience architecture · HPCA 2015
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › memory fault tolerance
DRAM resilience
0.212015
CiDRA: A cache-inspired DRAM resilience architecture · HPCA 2015
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › error correction
error-correcting codes
0.212015
CiDRA: A cache-inspired DRAM resilience architecture · HPCA 2015
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › error-correcting codes for memory
rank-level ECC
0.212015
CiDRA: A cache-inspired DRAM resilience architecture · HPCA 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

bloom filter · 0.2SRAM cache · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 CiDRA: A cache-inspired DRAM resilience architecture
abstract
Although aggressive technology scaling has allowed manufacturers to integrate Giga bits of cells into a cost-sensitive main memory DRAM device, these cells have become more defect-prone. With increased cell failure rates, conventional solutions such as populating spare DRAM rows and relying on error-correcting codes (ECCs) have shown limited success due to high area overhead, the latency penalties of data coding, and interference between ECC within a device (in-DRAM ECC) and other ECC across devices (rank-level ECC). In this paper, we propose CiDRA, a cache-inspired DRAM resilience architecture, which substantially reduces the area and latency overheads of correcting bit errors on random locations due to these faulty cells. We put a small SRAM cache within a DRAM device to replace accesses to the addresses including the faulty cells with ones that correspond to the cache data array. This CiDRA cache is paired with a Bloom filter to minimize the energy overhead of accessing the cache tags for every DRAM access and is also partitioned into small pieces, each being associated with the I/O pads for better area efficiency. Both the cache and DRAM banks are accessed in parallel while the banks are much slower. Consequently, the cache and filter are not in the critical path for normal DRAM accesses and incur no latency overhead. We also enhance the traditional in-DRAM ECC with error position bits and the appropriate error detecting capability while preventing interference with the traditional rank-level ECC scheme. By combining this enhanced in-DRAM ECC with the cache and Bloom filter, CiDRA becomes more area efficient because the in-DRAM ECC corrects most bit errors that are sporadic while the cache deals with the remaining relatively few pathological cases.
Young Hoon Son, Sukhan Lee 0002, Seongil O, Sanghyuk Kwon, Nam Sung Kim, Jung Ho Ahn
HPCA4