Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tyler Huberty
dblp:160/0664
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Memory systems · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory systems
cache management |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Exploiting compressed block size as an indicator of future reuse · HPCA 2015 |
Memory systems › cache management
cache insertion policy |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Exploiting compressed block size as an indicator of future reuse · HPCA 2015 |
Memory systems › cache management
cache replacement |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Exploiting compressed block size as an indicator of future reuse · HPCA 2015 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Exploiting compressed block size as an indicator of future reuseabstractWe introduce a set of new Compression-Aware Management Policies (CAMP) for on-chip caches that employ data compression. Our management policies are based on two key ideas. First, we show that it is possible to build a more efficient management policy for compressed caches if the compressed block size is directly used in calculating the value (importance) of a block to the cache. This leads to Minimal-Value Eviction (MVE), a policy that evicts the cache blocks with the least value, based on both the size and the expected future reuse. Second, we show that, in some cases, compressed block size can be used as an efficient indicator of the future reuse of a cache block. We use this idea to build a new insertion policy called Size-based Insertion Policy (SIP) that dynamically prioritizes cache blocks using their compressed size as an indicator. We compare CAMP (and its global variant G-CAMP) to prior on-chip cache management policies (both size-oblivious and size-aware) and find that our mechanisms are more effective in using compressed block size as an extra dimension in cache management decisions. Our results show that the proposed management policies (i) decrease off-chip bandwidth consumption (by 8.7% in single-core), (ii) decrease memory subsystem energy consumption (by 7.2% in single-core) for memory intensive workloads compared to the best prior mechanism, and (iii) improve performance (by 4.9%/9.0%/10.2% on average in single-/two-/four-cor e workload evaluations and up to 20.1%) CAMP is effective for a variety of compression algorithms and different cache designs with local and global replacement strategies. Gennady Pekhimenko, Tyler Huberty, Onur Mutlu, Phillip B. Gibbons, Michael A. Kozuch, Todd C. Mowry |
HPCA | 2 |