Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Bradley Fidler

dblp:160/1133 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-2882-5915ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Usable security · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Usable security › security operations
security operations center
0.712023
Work-From-Home and COVID-19: Trajectories of Endpoint Security Management in a Security Operations Center · USENIX Security Symposium 2023
Computational social science and digital humanities
organizational studies
0.212023
Work-From-Home and COVID-19: Trajectories of Endpoint Security Management in a Security Operations Center · USENIX Security Symposium 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

qualitative analysis · 1.3interview study · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Work-From-Home and COVID-19: Trajectories of Endpoint Security Management in a Security Operations Center
Kailani R. Jones, Dalton A. Brucker-Hahn, Bradley Fidler, Alexandru G. Bardas
USENIX Security Symposium3
2017 Metadata, infrastructure, and computer-mediated communication in historical perspective
abstract
In this paper we describe the creation and use of metadata on the early Arpanet as part of normal network function. By using the Arpanet Host‐Host Protocol and its sockets as an entry point for studying the generation of metadata, we show that the development and function of key Arpanet infrastructure can be studied by examining the creation and stabilization of metadata. More specifically, we use the Host‐Host Protocol's sockets as an example of something that, at the level of the network, functions as both network infrastructure and metadata simultaneously. By presenting the function of sockets in tandem with an overview of the Host‐Host Protocol, we argue for the further integrated study of infrastructure and metadata. Finally, we reintroduce the concept of infradata to refer specifically to data that locate data throughout an infrastructure and are required by the infrastructure to function, separating them from established and stabilized standards. We argue for the future application of infradata as a concept for the study of histories and political economies of networks, bridging the largely library and information science (LIS) study of metadata with the largely science and technology studies (STS) domain of infrastructure.
Bradley Fidler, Amelia Acker
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.1